【Anti-theft Sticker Chapter】

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

......

......

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

Then, on August 19, the six victims of the fraud filed a class action lawsuit against Egret, demanding damages totaling up to $3 million and demanding that Igrett shut down the 58list website.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

In a very old-fashioned job search scam case, criminals used the 58list platform to post a series of advertisements for part-time typists, data entry clerks, etc., and then defrauded job applicants of cash on the grounds of onboarding deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

After the victim called the police, the local FBI in San Francisco quickly determined that it was a gang fraud case.

At the same time, the 58list team was also notified as soon as possible, and banned the accounts and posts suspected of fraud.

It stands to reason that the next step is naturally the investigation and detection of the case.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.

It just so happened to be in San Francisco.

Very old-fashioned job search scams, criminals use 58list to hire part-time typists, data entry clerks and other advertisements, and then defraud job seekers of cash on the grounds of employment deposits, training fees, etc. In just one week after the launch of 58list, 6 people were hooked, and the amount of fraud reached $23,000.

However, the traditional print media was already eyeing 58list's withdrawal, and after the fraud occurred, the San Francisco Chronicle, a subsidiary of the Hearst Group, quickly followed up, and even carried a special report on the front page on August 18, attacking the security of 58list's service.