In Bai Song's opinion, there are too many loopholes and clues in this case.

When you want to disguise a clue, you tend to leave more clues behind.

The first is, since the contact person and the driver did not communicate with each other by telephone or other means, then through what? According to common sense, if you want to hit Bai Song's car, you must grasp the information as soon as possible, and then prepare to catch up, otherwise the information will be a few minutes behind, and you will not be able to catch up.

The second is, how did the contact person find out about the driver's dinner at the restaurant? Why did he rush over to destroy the video today? Why didn't he know about it yesterday and the day before yesterday?

What the hell is the person who went to secretly destroy the monitoring equipment today?

The third is, the car has been professionally modified, who does this? It is impossible for someone who does not have a little level of auto repair to do this. Moreover, this kind of modification, the average auto repair shop, do not dare to do it with money.

It's not about changing anything else, it's about changing the brakes to malfunction, which is just a joke. So this car must have been changed in the parking place, and it can't be driven over after the change. The driver's previous parking spot has also been found, but there is a lot of evidence left at the scene.

Fourthly, who changed the seat belt of the car? These are two different things. The driver doesn't want to die, and he's not stupid if the seat belt is broken or if it looks like it's broken.

Bai Song will not underestimate anyone, even this dead driver, must not be a fool. Therefore, he has no doubt that there is no superficial problem with the moment the car's seat belt is fastened.

It wasn't until after a violent impact that the car's seat belt went wrong, which was also a technical job. And it is likely that it is not a group of people who changed the brakes before, because this modification is to avoid the driver.

Fifth...

What era is it, and you dare to play like this...

Is this a fool of the police? It may seem to the non-specialist to be the perfect crime, but there are a lot of holes, and every time someone tries to erase a new hole, it leaves either a new hole in the evidence or a new hole in logic.

Analyzing them one by one, in terms of contact information, there may be several, and the most likely way is to contact directly. In other words, the location of the contact person is the position where the driver can see it, and there is direct contact between the two through gestures, etc.

Combined with the parking spot of the car, Bai Song and everyone analyzed the building structure of the community, if this contact person should be able to see Bai Song's parking space and the driver's parking spot at the same time, then there are not many places to choose, and Team Li directly arranged two people to go to the scene.

Regarding the fact that someone went to breach the surveillance today, now the information of this person has also reached the tables of several people.

"There's something wrong with this person, I don't look like a normal person. Someone made the point: "We need to do a psychiatric evaluation of him." ”

"Well, that's definitely going to happen. Team Lee agreed.

"yes, yes, gotta do it. Someone chimed in: "I'll go and report to the Qin detachment." ”

"No, I don't. Team Li raised his hand to stop him, "Don't worry, there will definitely be arrangements on the Qin detachment's side." ”

This person's name is Wang Shujun, a farmer, a native of Jiangxi Province, in his 40s this year, he has been in Tianhua City for a while, he is a part-time worker, he is very uncooperative with the police, the police don't know what he asked, and asked him why he wanted to destroy the surveillance, his statement was that he wanted to steal something, and then there was nothing to steal, for fear of being discovered, so he destroyed the surveillance.

It seems to everyone that this person will not be the liaison, but it is more likely that someone hired him to do this, and it is estimated that he also made some promises.

This person is stupid, a tendon, and it is estimated that he also took money and was used by others.

Sometimes, it is difficult for a person like this to be taken seriously anywhere, and once someone shows kindness to him, it is easy to be moved. Regarding his analysis, it is generally believed that the person who hired him gave him a lot of money, which was enough to make him willing to take the risk of being caught.

If it is only intentional destruction of property, this matter is an ordinary criminal case, and it is not even enough to meet the standards of a criminal case. Therefore, even if this person is arrested by the police, it is estimated that he will be ordered to be imprisoned for a maximum of 7 to 15 days.

In the case of public order cases, public security detention is a penalty of up to 15 days per case, and in criminal cases, the maximum is 7 days, after which either arrest or release is required.

Arrest is out of the question, the case is too small.

According to article 122 of the Criminal Procedure Law, the period for a criminal suspect to conduct a psychiatric evaluation is not included in the time limit for handling the case.

In other words, if the seven-day period of detention is regarded as an hourglass that counts down to seven days, then once the psychiatric evaluation begins, the hourglass will stop until the moment the evaluation results are available.

After analyzing it, once this detainee has been detained for more than 15 days, he will definitely have great distrust of his "employer", and this matter is much simpler.

From the game with the opponent, it can be seen that this opponent still handles many details very well, and knows how to destroy evidence. But

Whoever walks by, he will leave a mark ---- Edmund Rocca.

There used to be a very hot topic, if a professional criminal investigation expert goes to commit a crime, is it possible to complete the perfect crime?

There is actually an answer to this question, it can't be.

This is like asking, is it possible for a top doctor or academician-level boss to understand all medical skills?

The same is true for criminal investigation experts, the farther they go in an industry, the more specialized they must become. A footprint specialist may be able to process his own footprints seamlessly, but he may not be able to handle other clues as well.

...

Next is the problem of repairing the car, such a large car in the process of repair and change, as well as the parking site, still found a lot of traces. In terms of technique, this person's technique is there, but there are many bumps.

In other words, the damage to the car's braking system is likely to be at night and poor lighting conditions.

What is the nature of destroying these things?

These car repairers, as long as they know a little bit of the law, are unlikely to engage in this behavior.

Let's start with the act of destroying the brakes. If the repairman knew that the driver was going to kill someone, then he was an accomplice to the crime of intentional homicide; of course, he probably did not know, then according to the first paragraph of Article 119 of the Criminal Law, he had committed the crime of sabotage of a means of transportation, and the consequences had already been caused, and the sentence was exactly the same as that of intentional homicide.

Speaking of the destruction of seat belts, this is an accomplice to the crime of intentional homicide.

Bai Song couldn't help but feel helpless for these people, how much money is appropriate for such a big crime?