Some people think that the practice of killing a hundred is really easy to use, and some people think that this method is not easy to use, and there is always a very special feeling in the past, that is, killing a hundred should be very useful.

Especially in real life, in the process of teaching, we always encounter such a situation, when we encounter several students who make trouble, we conquer one of them.

The rest of the students, they all sit quietly in the classroom and listen to your lectures, as if they have conquered everyone.

For example, when you are very strict with a student, other students will also follow such strict requirements, I remember the last time I checked the homework, there was a student whose handwriting was very sloppy, and as a result, I tore off his homework that day, and then many students unconsciously wrote their own words very completely, when I told them the requirements for writing homework, many students they also slowly changed themselves, slowly approaching the requirement, that time I told them that there should be no ink bumps when writing homework, and after I tore off the homework with ink bumps, All the students consciously write very neatly, and write very good homework for you to see, in fact, sometimes this is the role of killing a hundred people.

However, I found that this effect is still very useful, because in many cases, as long as one person has such a standard, the rest of the people will also follow this standard, the first time I told them the requirements for writing formal assignments, because I read so many assignments, but many of the assignments did not meet the requirements, and after I checked, I told them how to write!

The homework that does not meet the requirements before is done in accordance with the standards of homework, although it is a little difficult at the beginning, but, in this homework, I also clearly remember that a few students shed tears because of poor homework, in fact, sometimes I found that it is not necessarily the teacher who deliberately embarrassed them, but they should really improve themselves, to a higher realm, and this role is precisely to let them improve themselves, sometimes I found that in real life they are stricter, in the usual work and study, they are stricter, there will be some good results。

During that period of time, the homework was very well written, that is, because they had strict requirements, and as soon as the requirements for them were relaxed, they would collapse into an army, and if you use the language of the army, I think it should be such a statement, that is, it will not be able to form an army, and it is unbearable to gamble.

For example, if you don't allow it first, the rest of the people, they don't even have the qualifications to report to your side, and they don't have the courage to report.

For example, when the first student reports that the toilet is not approved, many of the remaining students will sit obediently in the classroom and wait for the end of class to go to the toilet, no matter how much he needs, but there will still be some students, after the first student is rejected, after not being approved to go to the toilet, they will apply again, and as a result, if they are not allowed to go to the toilet again at this time, I think the people below will also see the teacher's face, and when they see the teacher's unhappy look, they will not apply to go to the toilet againIt's really easy to use.

Although it is a very simple idiom and a very simple practice, but in our real life, it will always be full of such a practice and a saying, that is, to kill a hundred examples, such a practice, sometimes there is a feeling of repeated trials, that is, every time I feel very practical, It's very easy to use, but sometimes I still think about it every time, that is, to kill the chicken to the monkey, there is also such an allusion, at this time, I found out that killing the chicken to the monkey, after a long time, the monkey also learned to kill the chicken, what kind of logic and what kind of statement is it?

What's the difference between it and us making an example? And I've found out that there's a difference.

But what kind of difference is there? And this killing chicken shows the monkey, and finally the monkey also learns to kill the chicken, who invented such a sentence, whether it is the truth or not, I really don't know, but if you kill a hundred examples, I think it should be a good truth.

This is the same thing that we often encounter, some are like this, and all people say like that, killing an example and killing a chicken to show the monkey, what is the difference between this?

Even I don't understand this logic and the truth in it, but since such a question has been raised, then think about it for a while, but I really think that the idiom of killing a hundred people, there will always be a feeling of repeated trials, no matter at any time and under any circumstances, it will have the same effect on one of the other people, this is the effect, sometimes I find that many people in the back actually have no guts, they are just watching what the people in front of them do, and there are many people in the back who are following the trend, that is, following the people in front of them to do nonsense hereAt that time, I found that when we faced many scenes, there would still be a feeling of capturing the thief and capturing the king first, which should be similar to killing a hundred people!

At this time, I found out that killing a hundred and catching a thief and capturing the king first should be roughly the same two idioms, and they are also roughly the same two environments with similar contexts, even if it is an example?