☆, O4O68 - according to character

Me: "It's hard to stuff myself in, how can I be scared away by money? unfair treatment...... Maybe they didn't even realize it. ”

Zhou Qingwei: "Yes, there is only the master in his eyes." is like Lu Linling, the breeder of Jiang Weixiao. It's a shame that Lu Linling got a master, otherwise it's really hard to say what that young master can do, if his father can safely prevent him, he won't let Lu Linling get into the list of breeder candidates. ”

Me: "The lethality of the bear child is terrifying. ”

Zhou Qingwei looked at me and smiled meaningfully.

Me: "Can you say something straight?"

Zhou Qingwei: "After Indigo Yi was born, my father was too busy, and my mother was gentle, and her mind was mainly on my dad, so I usually dealt with it when Indigo committed a bear." After the death of his parents, Indigo Yi has grown a lot, but his nature has not been completely erased, sometimes he still bears, but the bears are not as blatant as when he was a child, and there are more proportions, layers and expansion effects, but I can still catch him every time. ”

Me: "So?"

Zhou Qingwei: "I am very comfortable with bear children, and I am also very suitable for bear children wearing the skin of good children. ”

Me: "Is this what it means to warn me not to take Zhou Qingxing badly?"

Zhou Qingwei: "If it's bad, it may not be bad." ”

Me: "But you said you wanted Zhou Qingxing to maintain a static way of moving. ”

Zhou Qingwei: "Do you have to be dynamic when committing a bear?"

Me: "Of course you can be dynamic and static, but it requires intelligence, and I may not be able to teach." ”

Zhou Qingwei: "Your senior brother seems to be very good at this?"

Me: "That's pretty good, but what are you going to pay for his teaching? It's expert instruction, and it's very expensive. You may be able to give a lot, but if we can bring back too little to the Overworld, you can't afford to pay us. ”

Zhou Qingwei: "That's a problem. ”

Me: "You think slowly, I'll play with Zhou Qingxing first." ”

Zhou Qingwei: "Qingxing said that she would take you to school?"

Me: "Well, if you and the school agree. Mainly on the school side, for fear of causing a commotion. ”

Zhou Qingwei: "If you can guarantee to control your range of movement, it's not a big problem. Because of Haruki's health, we specially selected a school and class with a gentle and introverted style for her, so if you keep with Haruki and her classmates, there won't be much commotion. ”

Me: "Divide classes by personality?"

Zhou Qingwei: "Some schools will do this. Some people are suitable to work with people with different personalities, while some are more capable of swinging themselves in their kind. Although children are often uncertain and need to be exposed to all kinds of things and try out their upper and lower limits, this kind of 'trying' is best done voluntarily rather than 'for your good' compulsion. ”

Zhou Qingwei: "There are always some people who think that it is better for children to be lively and bold, so they put those introverted and shy children into the pile of lively and bold children, hoping that the former can be assimilated. In fact, this kind of hope itself means negation, negation of a part of the character, and the perception of a certain part of the character as negative and bad. ”

☆、O4O69 - as long as it is not necessarily wrong

Zhou Qingwei: "But the adults who think so have not thought that children have become such a character that needs to be corrected in the eyes of adults, partly because of the adults around the children, and partly because they are born. Either way, it actually means that these personalities are suitable for the child, their natural strengths, and their acquired adaptation to their surroundings. ”

Zhou Qingwei: "Introverted and outgoing, there is no difference between the two personalities, which one is suitable for which one should go on which road." Swing your own nature, not distort your own nature, and compare yourself to someone of another nature from scratch. Why do you cut off your legs and connect with fake ones to compare yourself with others?"

Zhou Qingwei: "It's obviously not suitable, but it changes just because adults think 'it's better', but adults probably haven't thought that what is good now, when the children grow up and when they are hundreds of years later, it may become inappropriate and bad." If we can't predict the future, we shouldn't use our speculation about the future to break the present. ”

Zhou Qingwei: "If you don't do something that must be wrong, just do the rest of the vaguely defined things, maybe after tens of hundreds of years, the form will be reversed, and what was once bad will become good?"

Me: "How do you define 'must be wrong'?"

Zhou Qingwei: "To put it simply, it's a crime. ”

Me: "What if it's not enough to break the law, but it's morally mobbed? ”

Zhou Qingwei: "It's a multiple-choice question, depending on whether you are willing to take the risk of being besieged and stand by and watch, or reach out to appease public opinion." However, if this is the case, it seems that no matter which one you choose, it has little to do with morality, but only one of the ways to deal with public opinion. When public opinion attacks others with morality, whether morality is still morality is sometimes blurred. Even if someone really did something immoral, when public opinion forced him to die, is public opinion still on the same side as morality?"

Zhou Qingwei: "Morality is different from law, there is no clear dividing line between morality, so everyone may have their own set of yardsticks. This is nothing, just a personal idea, but some people will use what should be a personal yardstick to measure, judge, and demand from others. The worst part is that the same person's ruler floats, and it fluctuates quite dramatically. ”

Zhou Qingwei: "Obviously, morality should give priority to oneself rather than others, but there are always some people who are strict with others and lenient with themselves. ”

☆、O4O7O-Interests first

Zhou Qingwei: "I heard from the people who used to raise the human race of the Lord World that you don't have too strong a sense of morality?"

Me: "To put it mildly, to put it bluntly, the monks have no morals, they don't even have the law. Many monks don't care about killing people and setting fires, and many of those who care are not moral, but only for profit. Killing a person may attract the revenge of that person's relatives and friends, and may lead to his own inner demons, it is not worth it, it is better to rob him of his interests. ”

Me: "But if mortals come to you in the future, you will appear, and there are still normal people in the human race in the main world, normal people who abide by the law and can speak reason. ”

Zhou Qingwei: "What do you mean by this?"

Me: "Yes, I just mean that the monk is abnormal." Most of the monks are too individualistic and don't use their own morality to restrain others, and the side effect is that they don't restrain themselves, because basically even if they don't have a moral outlook, they only want to benefit. Very pure idea of putting interests first. ”

Me: "The reason why this kind of thinking doesn't make the cultivation realm a miasma is only because the higher the cultivation level, the more connections with the world, and the broader the scope of 'interests' will be. Since we want to pursue long-term interests, we can't do everything we can. Some of the words may be harshly criticized, but the theory I support is that 'morality' is a benefit in itself. ”

Me: "To hurt, to oppress, to destroy...... These will inevitably exist, but too many people resist and hinder their development by attacking them as 'immoral', so in order to develop them smoothly, they naturally have to be 'moral'. It's always going to be tough against most people. Broad morality is to profit the world, and the ultimate goal is still profit. ”

Me: "There are always some people who think that 'profit' is stinky, ugly, and shameful to say, but what is wrong with pursuing profit? The key is, why should we limit 'profit' to 'money'? Emotion, fame, honor, and freedom...... Whereas all the things that make people feel satisfied can be called profits, but some people only think that they represent money?

Me: "A noble person must be selfless? Why do you want to oppose public and private? These are two things that can and should coexist. ”

Just like the Yunxia Sect's emphasis on the interests of the sect, it has never been at the expense of harming personal interests, even if it is temporarily injured in the last resort, there will inevitably be more compensation later. A collective that is maintained only by sacrificing the individual can exist for a while, but it can never last for 10,000 years. Only when we can see the hope of the future will we be willing to sacrifice the present, and only when we have seen the past that we will have a high reward for sacrifice will we have the next sacrifice.

Compared to the "good intentions" of "I am experienced, I feel that this is better, so you should do this", the "advice" of "you can make a profit by doing this, I don't believe me, I will give you a list of algorithms, and you can do the math yourself" is obviously much more convincing.

I want benefits, I want to be practical, I want to be good, I want to see, touch, and feel good, not 'everyone says good'. 'Everyone' has nothing to do with me, only myself is directly related to me, and after I have satisfied myself, I have the leisure to take care of others, starting with the people close to me. As for those who are far away, they can't take care of it, let them take care of themselves, don't come over and cut in line.

Zhou Qingwei: "Do you firmly think so, or are you just convincing yourself to be firm?"

Me: "Not sure. I think it's the former, but when I think about this kind of question again and again, and I think this repeated emphasis implies that I am hesitant, otherwise I don't need to spend time thinking about it. There is something with a definite answer, and there is no need for a long argument. ”

Zhou Qingwei: "Do you think you can successfully convince yourself?"

Me: "I think I can." Because my ideas are in line with the way of life that makes me feel comfortable, the only thing that makes me hesitate is that it is not quite the same as the conventional framework. I want to make sure that my ideas are out of the norm and not hurt by the norm. Some things are not wrong, but too many unfounded accusations can also make the person in question unhappy, and I don't want to waste my life on accusations that can be avoided. ”

The author has something to say: ~