When we want to do something, or want something, at this time, someone suddenly stands up against our want, at this time, whether the other party is against the reason, whether it is our mistake, we will not be happy in our hearts, and we will have uncomfortable feelings, confrontation will arise, and our desire will be blocked.

We will definitely push forward the feeling of wanting, although it is blocked, the pain is generated, and the other party also has the desire to object, because of our confrontation, she also has pain, and the confrontation escalates, and the two sides start from this, say one more word to each other to stop each other, or do any other behavior, they all continue to add to the blockage.

Keeping silent can prevent this confrontation from escalating, but how to export what you want to do, it seems that there is no way, or to suppress it painfully, and wait for time to eliminate, I feel that this will have a bad impact on myself, or maybe I have more control.

And the other is to do what you want to do, so that you can export it, but because it is blocked, as for doing it, you won't be particularly happy, things are irreparable, and the human brain wants to feel as if this is how it works.

Knowing this can make you understand your behavior more clearly, and if the other party in the relationship does not understand this cognition, in fact, the conflict is difficult to avoid, and many times, the conflict must occur, otherwise it is a compromise, in order to avoid this conflict, let some correct behavior cognition be suppressed, it will definitely not be chosen this way.

Su's understanding of other performers is carried out through newspapers, and both sides seem to be well aware of each other's existence, and sometimes there will be confrontations, and there are comparisons, and it is easy to make a choice judgment, and Sue has also compared, and the two sides are just inclined to different groups of interests in the means of building a Justice League, and there is not much difference for Su, because they don't seem to tilt their interests towards themselves.

When I chose to vote, I chose the person who went to the scene to see it, why did I have such a choice, I felt that after reading it on the spot, I seemed to have a familiar feeling, and there was a connection between them, and I read it through the newspaper, which was a little far away.

Speed did not analyze who would be the leader of the Justice League according to their words, and the study tour told the speed, after going up, there were many people who did not implement the ideas of their speeches, and many things were not decided by him alone, and various resolutions were passed when making decisions, and those he was currently narrating were just some ideas, and after he really became the leader of the Justice League, whether these ideas could be implemented or not, it was difficult to say.

And these are just ideas, ordinary people can't tell the difference, although these ideas sound very good, but in fact they can't be implemented, there are too many details, and the reality encountered is very complicated.

This side is just choosing the alliance leader, in fact, because it has been discussed in the previous consultation, everything has been carried out synchronously according to the negotiated process, the logistics have begun to prepare, and the gathering of personnel has begun to arrange and dispatch.

And the selection of the alliance leader is the election of the alliance leader, and the other commanders needed by the Justice League have already begun to be selected, but because the alliance leader is chosen by ordinary people and is concerned by ordinary people, many of those commanders may have already been decided, and they have already negotiated the candidates.

It seems that they have no chance to participate in the selection of those high-level officials, and there may be no chance for the selection of middle-level officials, but it seems that the small leaders at the bottom, on the front line, in the place where they work, these speeds can participate in the selection, and with the ability of speed, it should not be a problem to be a squad leader on the battlefield or something.

Now the decision is up to speed, whether he wants to participate or not, from the experience of speed, if speed knows about this, he will definitely participate, and Yeyue will also encourage speed to participate, she wants to take risks, and with the ability that Yeyue has, these adventures will only give her a sense of excitement, and there will be no danger, just because of this layer of possible protection, Yeyue will choose to take risks, in fact, at the beginning, Yeyue will not have this layer of consideration, she just wants to meet what she feels wants, what danger, what death is not something Yeyue can think of。

However, even if the selection of the bottom level is in the speed, I only heard that there is such a thing, and if you go to understand it, you will find that a lot of thresholds have been set first, and the speed is not qualified to participate at all, so even if they have a strong combat power, in the face of this layer of threshold setting, they can't enter at all.

Therefore, in the face of these seemingly righteous situations, people who have experienced it can only do some ridicule and are powerless to change something, because this is how it is confrontational, the threshold set by the circle to protect the interests of their own circle, and the confrontation with outsiders in the circle who are not qualified enough to set the threshold of ability, but the threshold of identity.

And this identity is not immediately obtained, it may take twenty or thirty years, or more, so that this threshold setting is operable, it is more difficult for outsiders to enter, a person's energy must be limited, and it is difficult to enter another circle if you work hard in a certain circle.

That's right, if we talk about familiarity, examining this, it is really people outside the circle who can't compare with it, but is it the contradiction between the people inside the circle, or the contradiction between the outside of the circle and the inside of the circle? The contradiction within the circle is a problem of the distribution of interests and a problem of upward circulation.

And the contradiction between the outside of the circle and the circle is a matter of being plundered and suppressed in the eyes of speed. If you want to enjoy the services provided by that circle, you must pay benefits, and whether the benefits paid are monopolized by the circle, whether they are high, this is a kind of plunder, of course, you enjoy the service quickly, and the equivalent exchange is not considered to be the plundered part.

Whether the circle is efficient or inefficient, this is also the reason for the rapid plunder, high efficiency can reduce the price, chaotic and inefficient circles, the price is high. Circle monopoly leads to high price plunder, and speed will also be enjoyed.

Therefore, full competition, the development of non-monopoly within the circle, which is beneficial to the speed, but also to the circle, so that the speed is less plundered, the circle will also exist for the competitive advantage, the internal contradictions will also be solved, all for efficiency, improve competitiveness.

As long as the circle is not monopolized and fully competitive, these contradictions are solved, and this is the way it is, as for the quick enjoyment of the service, being plundered by a small part, this can only be solved in another way, if you want to exchange at equal value, you must need the distribution coordination between different circles, so that quick consumption and enjoyment will not be plundered, which is equivalent to exchange.

Now the problem is that if you want to be able to make money quickly, this is very crucial, and if you can't make money quickly, he can't enjoy the service. Speed can make money in his own circle and with his own ability, which doesn't seem to be a problem.

So what is a problem? How to cultivate the ability of speed, education, as well as the speed of one's own family teaching, social teaching, one's own learning, as long as the speed of ability to learn, the speed of ability improvement is not a problem, as long as education and other problems are solved, there is no problem to improve the ability of speed, education is efficient and quickly improve an ability, this is the education to solve their own problems.

There is still a very important question: Is there such a large number of circles in this society? Is there a chance for many people like them to make money? There is demand, if there is demand, speed them, and all people in society have consumption needs, and there will be opportunities to make money.

It's a linkage process. This means that a healthy society, a society with a good distribution system, a society that operates like the above, but if a society with a bad distribution system is a society with a large gap between the rich and the poor, and a society with a large gap between the rich and the poor can be described as a bad society, it is definitely not good, no matter how you cover it up, it is not good.

In a society with a bad distribution system, the power of consumption will soon be over, there are many people below who have a lot of needs, but there is no money to spend, the people above have lost their needs, but there is a lot of money, they pretend to be a store of value, if it is an investment, it is fine, but it is converted into data, or gold or something, for the country, it is very unfavorable for the poor people, and social instability begins.

When it is converted into fixed assets, just like countless houses, and other fixed assets, they are very smart, and the fixed assets belong to the state, and it is useless, many of them will not do this, there is a big contradiction, the state must find a way to let those rich people consume, but the rich obviously want to occupy the country's resources, want the country's assets to become their own assets, and the country's rights become their own rights, otherwise they will not spend money.

Rich people are not stupid, they don't have as many emotional thoughts as poor people, if poor people become rich, they will also gain more knowledge, they will become smarter, and they will also have new ideas.

This contradiction is difficult to solve, and from the very beginning the system determines that this conflict contradiction will eventually erupt between the rich and the country and the people, and if the system is not changed from the beginning, this situation will continue to happen like this, and the final result will be a war, a people's uprising to overthrow the government and overthrow the rich. Or the rich overthrow the government, of course, when the government prevents them from obtaining the power and resources, if the government and the rich merge and let the rich control the power and resources of the state, then it is still a popular uprising that leads to war.

Many people think that how can the people in this society revolt, when you can't survive, when many people can't survive, after they know their own end, they won't wait to starve to death, and when they can still move, they will launch their own uprising.

It seems to have fallen into the history of other regions in the past, although it is a modern weapon, a modern tool used, but the system has completely fallen into the history that happened in other regions in the past, what to do, the choice is in the hands of the government, the people are oppressed, and they do not have the right to choose.

However, think about it quickly, the current people's thinking should be smart by those people in the historical period, maybe it can be solved, in fact, there is no way to be smart, the person who makes the choice, the person who has the right to choose is not smart, and other people can only watch if they are smart.

According to the comparison, the government cooperates with the rich to give power and resources to the rich, and the people who cannot survive will eventually revolt if the system is not changed.

The government suppresses the rich, does not give the rich rights and resources, and the system does not change, and the people will not be able to survive in the end, which may lead the people to revolt, or the rich to lead the people to revolt.

The government suppresses the rich, does not give the rich rights and resources, and does not change the system, but the government uses the local tyrants to divide the land to mobilize the people to deal with the rich, it seems that the result is not good, but it seems to have some effect, the people did not revolt to overthrow the government, but supported it, and then the people still miss that era, only those who were hurt and the remnants are fighting against the government, but they can't turn the waves, and the fishermen profit.

Of course this is the way the conspiracy theorists guess that someone came up with it, maybe it's a coincidence, and then the conspiracy theorists link it together and piece together the meaning to make people guess it as such. In fact, it is possible that no one has designed this play, it is just a coincidental development, there are indeed too many coincidences, so that someone suspects that the whole earth has been designed, there are indeed too many repetitions, maybe this is the universe, it is a repetition, it is a science, it may be repeated by coincidence, as long as the conditions are ripe, a phenomenon will be repeated, and only the universe has the ability to design, human beings themselves can only trigger a certain phenomenon as a condition, it sounds very mysterious and scientific, but for someone who sees these phenomena and is afraid of the phenomenon of the universe design, he wants to break the universe designer, or want to see what kind of existence the designer of the universe really is, he has been in fear.

The government has improved the system, of course, this has not been tried by the government, it is a new way, but the theoretical description seems to be correct, and it is not clear whether there will be any bad results in practice. However, the government has seen too much history, and has tried and seen the outcome of what happened above, so can modern civilization try the way above and do not improve the system, will it get different results, and this is also the same way?