"What is a crime?" When Cang solved the case, the upper echelons were still arguing about the way to solve the case with a killer.

Although everything in the warehouse is very beautiful from the direction of saving money, from the perspective of ethics, using murderers to solve cases is definitely unacceptable to ordinary people, and if it is exposed, I am afraid that I will be scolded to death by the masses.

Therefore, before the masses know the truth, the upper echelons must think of a good excuse. This needs to be discussed by scholars to prove that it is reasonable and in line with the historical process to use criminals to solve cases.

Now the upper echelons are debating scholars, and scholars who support killer detectives believe that those criminals who break through the bottom line of human morality are the most primitive state of human beings, and it is precisely with this primitive state that human beings stand out from the beasts.

"What is a crime? Crime is committed for personal gain against the interests of others. But from a historical point of view, the history of mankind is the history of crime, but the pattern of crime is that most people can infringe on the interests of a small number of people for the sake of profit. Constantly sacrificing the interests of a small number of people is the history of mankind. Therefore, I believe that not only can we use criminals who have committed the most heinous crimes, but we can even rule the country with criminals who have committed the most heinous crimes. "Because these people will sacrifice a small number of people without mercy, and those who can make decisive judgments in history and sacrifice a few who have the support of the majority are called heroes." ”

"Nonsense, heroes do sacrifice a minority, but it doesn't mean that he doesn't care about the minority, making this decision was a helpless move at the time, not because the hero has no moral bottom line. Another scholar retorted.

However, scholars who support killer detectives are not worried: "But you also have to admit that there are commonalities between the two sides, and the results are the same." If we take away the humanistic feelings of the heroes, and constantly eliminate the ruling methods of a few people for the sake of social progress, won't it be the 'ideal world' that countless philosophers flock to, and the rulers who only make the right decisions and will not be affected by moral interference are not the 'philosopher-kings'?" "Therefore, I think these murderers have great research value, especially the kind of murderers who can complete major and important crimes without changing their faces, they are of course unforgivable crimes for individuals, but they are precious treasures for all mankind. ”

Hearing him say that a cold-blooded killer is equivalent to a 'philosopher king', many scholars are angry.

But as a ruler, you do need to be cold-blooded and ruthless sometimes, and only in this way can you maintain the progress of society.

"This guy is just so damning. The girl also heard their discussion, and hated this scholar who supported the killer very much, but even the experts couldn't refute it, and the girl certainly didn't have the knowledge to overturn the other party's arguments.

In fact, these experts are not unable to refute it, but they just talk about morality without convincing power. After all, morality is only to stabilize the social order most of the time, and when it comes to social turmoil, it is necessary for strong men to turn the tide. Not to mention the current competition between countries and countries, collectives and collectives, and between individuals, morality is definitely not a necessary condition for victory, but cold-blooded decision-making is. ”

"Is he really right?"

"It can't be said to be right, it can only depend on what you believe, after all, human beings are still developing, no one knows what will happen in the future, he said that cold-bloodedness is higher than morality, and it is only the embodiment of certain stages of history, not the whole history, after all, there are many tyrants in history, and I don't see any praise for tyrants, let alone the future. What do you believe the future holds?" said Duran slowly.

The girl's eyes widened, but there was no answer.

At this time, the supporters of the killer have proposed a future, that is, let the murderer rule the world, take advantage of the murderer's lack of mercy, let him make a judgment to sacrifice a few, so as to quickly promote the operation of the world.

Of course, to achieve this, we must rely on the development of technology, and we cannot rely only on the brain of a murderer, but at least the brains of 200 brutal murderers to form a hundred brains, so that we can have a more fair judgment. But if cold-blooded killers are not enough.

Mingde, but also Mingde.

Knowing the goal, we still need the way to operate, how can we judge who should be sacrificed and who should continue to contribute to society? This requires the assistance of high technology such as gene and mind detection, and we must test a certain characteristic of human beings to complete the judgment, rather than just relying on the killer's mouth.

In fact, many TV movies are set like this, such as "Minority Report" has a way of predicting other people's crimes, and there are also science fiction settings such as the very common selection of genes, or "Psychometrician" measures everyone's psychological index.

Only with this kind of science and technology, and with concrete operations, can the point of 'killer rule of the country' be established.

It is precisely because of such a screening mechanism, coupled with a ruthless ruler, that society can be run. It is not that the development of society can be accomplished with ruthless rulers, otherwise there would not be so many tyrants in history.

Duran told the girl: "This person's words are a little reasonable, but he has forgotten which of the tyrants in history is not more ruthless than the killer, and which tyrant has cared about Baixiao's life and death? But in the era of tyrants, has society made rapid progress? No, so it is not the killer who determines the operation of human society, and with the progress of human society, the current Holy and the White Lotus have become stumbling blocks to social progress, so everyone feels that a tyrant is needed." But in fact, even if there is a tyrant now, the tyrant will not be able to accurately distinguish between the White Lotus and the Holy, and then it will only be an indiscriminate blow, and another Axis will appear. If science and technology develop in the future, human beings can be screened out for advantages and disadvantages at birth, then there will be a chance for tyrants to display their talents. "Duran said that even if the 'philosopher king' appeared, the current social productivity would not allow him to fully display his wisdom.

The philosopher king is a maxima, and productivity is Bole, without Bole, there will be no maxima.

The girl was thoughtful, she had been by Duran's side for a long time, and the girl had to study hard to keep up with Duran's rhythm, she was only fourteen, but she now had a special way of learning, that is, to enter the dream of a scholar and let the scholar teach her. As a result, her knowledge level has been improving.

"But if productivity increases, do you really need a tyrant?, why not let a good man rule?"

"Yes, this is the flaw of this expert, he thinks that only killers can complete the work, in fact, good people can also do the same, but good people will hesitate, but good people can also complete the task as long as their IQ is normal, as long as they can judge the pros and cons. "Of course, unless, like in "Psychometrics", the killer's brain is needed as a benchmark to judge other people's crime index, and the killer's brain must be, otherwise it really doesn't mean that it must be a killer. It can only be said that let the killer rule the country, and at the same time, let the killer take the blame, so that ordinary people do not have to be responsible and bear the risk of infamy.

The girl despised the expert even more: "What kind of person, talking like a castle in the air, but ignoring reality at all." ”

"This is philosophy, philosophy always assumes an ideal state, assumes a rational person, so it is difficult for philosophy to become experience, and can only be used as a general direction, not as a governing idea. Duran told the girl that this is learning, this is theory, and there is a huge gap between practice.

The girl couldn't help nodding: "The knowledge that scholars learn comes from books, and the people who write books are also scholars, so that generations of scholars have passed it down, and they have no chance to go deep into society, no wonder they are all castles in the air." "If I read books in the future, I will definitely read more books written by people who have gone deep into society. The girl thinks that these books are not just wisdom, but also experience.