When he got up, he was depressed, he needed to work, and he didn't want to do these jobs. When he didn't talk about it, he was also depressed, because he was the same, he needed to work, to do the work he didn't want to do. In reality, these things cannot be avoided, if you don't do it today, you will still do it tomorrow.

However, not to mention that he soon became happy, not to mention that he was able to regulate his emotions easily, because he had mastered the way to regulate his emotions. He thinks about things he wants to do, and when he thinks about those things, his mood starts to improve, and he thinks about what he wants to do all the time, and thinks about how he plans to do it. It's a fantasy, and it may become a reality, but it's just a matter of moving back in time.

In this way, when you are temporarily accustomed to doing things you don't like to do in reality, what you should do in reality will be done, and when you are free in the future, what you like to do will also be done, and the overall process is in a good mood.

It's just a habit to do things you don't like, then you definitely won't think and do it at the same time, that is, doing things is just done habitually, not with your heart, after all, it's not what you like to do, it's normal. It's hard to get people to like things they don't like.

Why do you have to do things you don't like most of the time? Is this forced by reality? It should be forced by your own needs, just like you need resources, and resources are not something you can get by fantasizing, nor can you get them by doing what you like to do, if you can do what you like, you can get resources, this is a perfect thing for people.

Do people like resources? The body likes resources, people like resources, and people need resources. People also like to do what they like to do. People are determined by their own needs, and voluntariness means that they can always do what they like to do, and resources can be satisfied, and they cannot be satisfied. Involuntary means that you want to do things you don't like, and resources can be satisfied, and you can't be satisfied.

Knowing that people are manipulated by needs, they can use this law to achieve their own goals, or for their own selfish interests, to the detriment of others, or for the sake of social civilization and progress, to construct a good rule to manipulate people. How to choose, this is also to see the needs of the ruler.

This challenge organization is definitely for its own selfish interests, but in terms of being able to obtain a lot of resources as soon as possible, it is possible to think that this is a good platform for oneself to use this platform to obtain a large number of resources that cannot be obtained elsewhere.

Why is this for the sake of selfishness but for the public? Because the other party does not monopolize the access to resources and does not use violence to force others to do so, the underground competitive organizations will use violence to force some people to compete. Everything is voluntary, although the probability of death is really high.

In this way, the other party will use you to gain more profits, and you will also profit or die because of your voluntary choice, which is similar to the behavior of a businessman, voluntary, competitive, open, and both parties profit. The death caused by one's own incompetence has nothing to do with the businessman.

What did the merchants do to make people hate them so much? The gap between the rich and the poor, the wealth of the world that others felt was plundered by them, and the fact is that they did have a lot of resources. This is due to the fact that they add profits at the time of labor transactions.

This is also known as the commission, where two people trade for labor, and they charge a transaction fee. But why is it that they have 10 people, even if they charge transaction fees for labor transactions, they are unlikely to be rich? In fact, they have countless people, and there are very many people working in the entire industrial chain, and the larger the industrial chain, the more people who work, the richer they are, and the people at the top of the industrial chain are the richest.

They exploited the laborers, that's true. For each laborer, they do not exploit much, they are rich because all their labor contributes.

But if there were no merchants, who would be able to organize such transactions? If there was no exploitation, then the goods of trade created by the laborers were the resources that they produced every day according to their own abilities. Those laborers themselves will become businessmen, and they will increase their profits, which is unavoidable, it is human nature, and at the same time, it is also a consideration of possible losses.

If the state organizes this kind of trading activity, the state will also take its own cut, and the organization needs resources to survive, and if it doesn't take a cut from here, how can it survive?

Full competition is a good model, so that profits are generally reduced, at least a good model. But it will not solve the gap between rich and poor, which will arise over time. If the resources are sufficient, there is nothing to do with this gap between the rich and the poor, after all, they can all survive.

The most troublesome thing is that they can't survive, most people can't survive anymore, and their resources are relatively limited. And if you can't become a rich person in the front, you will basically stay poor in the future, and if you don't know how to change yourself, don't take risks, or work hard to improve yourself, you will basically not survive.

The businessman's model is the same as the swindler's pyramid scheme, exploiting the entire labor industry chain, that is, the businessman is beneficial to society, at least producing resources, and it is a slow commission. And MLM is unprofitable, fast, and completely exploits the output of the laborer, like a pure financial game. What they use is the law of human nature that people have needs.

Is it subjective conjecture that we come up with, and only the trajectory laws that really exist in the outside world are seen as objective reality? No, it is what you see or think of alone, what others can't see, what you can't think of, this is subjective conjecture, this is a kind of sensory existence, it is a kind of sensory existence, and in fact, objectively speaking, your imagination is also a realistic and objective existence.

But why is this not reality? Not objective? It can be repeated, it is called scientific objective reality, and what if someone keeps repeating our conjecture and revealing it? Is this an objective fact? Yes.

Yes, for your senses, your feelings are indeed moving, that is, your heart is moving, this is an objective reality, not an illusion. But the leaves are indeed moving, which is also an objective reality, depending on what is decided.

It's like when you're talking about leaves, and you say that the leaves aren't moving, that's unrealistic, reality the leaves are moving. That's obvious, depending on what you're discussing, and then determining whether you're a subjective fantasy or a reality. It's like when you say that a specific person has done something in reality, but he didn't do it, and all the other people see that he didn't do it, and you say that he did it, this is your subjective assumption.

But it is quite possible that you are right, he did it secretly, no one saw it, only he himself knew, of course he would not tell anyone, he did it. At this time, yours is an objective reality, and everyone else is a subjective conjecture.

It's quite difficult to distinguish, but in fact you know that you are also speculating and reasoning, and there is no actual evidence, is that subjective conjecture? No, if it can't be proven, then this is speculation, not subjective conjecture, and it may also be an illusion.

That's why we all say that if it's an objective reality, then come up with evidence to prove it. This thing is really around, in fact, it is very simple, objective reality, that is, there can be evidence to prove, if it can't be proved, we can say that this is speculation, fantasy, subjective consciousness, we can't say that this is false, because when we say it's false, we also have to show evidence to prove it.

Isn't it tiring to live like this? It's either very tiring, or it's a little slow, because you have to find evidence to prove everything yourself. Life is too short, many people can't afford this time, and if they can inherit it, they will use it directly, and they will not find evidence to prove it in person.

For this professional, he may have been doing this all his life to prove it himself, he has so much time, this is quite his job, he has a lot of time to use, and at the same time the outside world coerces him to do this, he wants to work, he is coerced by outside resources to work, to do this.

As for interests, in fact, it does not take as much time as professionals, work, life, entertainment and other interests, and once this time is allocated, this good interest may take up very little time. It may be because it is an interest, as mentioned above, thinking and doing are synchronized and coordinated, and the achievement may be greater than those professionals, which also means that those professionals are actually not synchronized with their work and thinking, and they want to go to other things.

However, there are also professionals who think and do synchronously, why do they achieve people who are not interested in the big people? This probability should be very small, maybe they may fall into the details of verification, thinking can not jump out of this pit, which also exists in many professionals.

More likely, they are too familiar with the definition to be in doubt. When they come across a definition, they feel that they understand, that is, the specific molecule, nothing special. And the interested person doesn't know much about these definitions, but will continue to specialize, what is going on? And in this process, he will discover a lot of secrets, not the secrets of this professional definition, the professional definition may have been thoroughly studied by others for a long time, and he will find the secrets of other things that cannot be determined, which is very interesting.

So the interested young man may be more likely to produce results, as long as he continues to specialize, he does not understand the professional definitions that the mentor understands, but he has a solid foundation to follow this path, he may discover other secrets, those secrets that are ignored by those who understand the definition at the beginning.

The difference between an inheritor and an explorer may be this. However, explorers may not be particularly professional and do not have enough professional knowledge to explore more deeply, and at this time, if explorers give up their exploration career to be inheritors, they feel a little bit giving up their advantages to do their own disadvantages.

Although it is possible to get a great result and make others remember themselves. But he may lose something greater, and his quest is the most important thing for everyone. It is the best and most efficient to divide labor and work together to play to your strengths.

As for who belongs to this achievement, it may be important for the individual to gain fame. For human beings, their results are great, and they still have human flaws that they cannot overcome. Interesting things, can we overcome them?