No need to describe the picture

What details, what pictures do not need to be described, that is, those that others already know, many people in this era know, of course, future generations may not be able to understand, this book for future generations to see? It seems that some are, some are not, that is, for the people of the current era, those details, those pictures do not need me to express in detail, just mention it, they will understand, you can connect, this is so convenient, and let us be lazy again ^_^, we don't take care of the feelings of future generations, some can't realize it, in fact, there is nothing, it's just what happened in this era, the overall memory of this era, not your descendants.

Just like the use of prisoners of war and the use of slaves for experiments, this kind of picture does not need to be described, and the reality should be more exciting than the story. It's just that for future generations, whether it's the details or the feeling of understanding, there will be no at all, or different, and I'm still quite entangled in whether to write this kind of detail or not.

The will of future generations will definitely be different, and may not be able to realize these things at all. Described in detail, it seems to be history, more may be the story, the story that happened in the past, we think that the ancients also thought about what the descendants would think, it is not clear whether someone clearly recounted their speculation about the views of the descendants, and the ancients could not verify whether their guesses were correct, after all, they have died, and they may guess the views of the descendants after a period of time in their lifetime, which is very interesting, in fact, it is very interesting to guess what the future self thinks of the present self,^_^.

In the future, there are many possibilities for yourself, in these possible situations, you will have different ideas about your current self, and your current self knows very well that there is only one future self, and what situation is this future self, the current self is really unthinkable, and you can't predict it, there are too many possibilities.

When it comes to being tired and lazy, we say that we are tired, and others say that we are lazy when they see our behavior, so that we can almost understand what is going on, whether we are tired or we are lazy? We feel tired that we don't want to do it, we can't do it, we can't do it, we don't want to do it, we don't want to do it, we don't want to do it, we don't want to do it, if we don't want to do it, if it's a sign of tiredness, then we can't evaluate whether we are lazy or tired.

If we don't want to do it, it's because it's tiring to do it, so what? We don't want to do it because it's tiring, it's painful, it's not happy. In this way, we don't have the feeling of laziness, the word lazy is a feeling that outsiders describe our behavior, and they themselves have a feeling that we are lazy, which is a cognitive wrong feeling, and this cognitive wrong feeling should be a lot.

It is likely that a lot of evaluation of other people's cognition is likely to be a wrong cognition, a self-righteous behavior to understand the world, not a kind of empathetic cognitive behavior, empathy is to stand in the other party's perspective to experience the other party's feelings, so that the cognition will become clear, in fact, there is no need to go to other people's perspective to experience other people's feelings, as long as you experience your own feelings, many people are common feelings, if you can experience all your own feelings, then basically the feelings that others will produce can be understood。

It's one thing to understand feelings, this feeling is in someone else, what scene will be generated, that's another thing, you are in that kind of scene may produce other feelings, not the same, the main reason is that the external scene may be the same, the internal structure is different, because people are different, people are different, genes, cell construction, nerves, cognition, experience, etc. will be completely different, and the feelings generated are also difficult to be the same.

If these perceptions are not clearly discerned, many things will continue to happen in some places. What is the organ that produces the feeling of tiredness and secretions? It is the organ that dominates our rest and recreation, and the organ that makes us happy. It's still too broad to say that organs, and cells might be more appropriate, maybe genes or something, or protein makers.

The thing that makes people scary is that when people fully understand their own structure, how they operate, and what they are, it is difficult for people to accept themselves, just like an intelligent robot knows what he is, if he has fear, he will be very afraid, and this fixed structure cannot be shaken off, because if you get rid of it, it is not yourself, and you may go crazy.

Therefore, understanding oneself and thinking about things is a slow process, not in a hurry, when there is progress, first steady, not in a hurry, first do something else to distract your attention, in fact, so that you will not be afraid to the point of madness, fear is a feeling that will make people lose control, is a kind of chaotic impact of all cells secreting a different hormone.

What about the story, what about the feeling of the story? Who knows, how to develop in the future, there is not a whole picture, there are many directions, but the details die in the idea of not repeating, it can also be said that there is no feeling that you want to write in particular, there is no feeling, there is no inspiration, it is a dilemma.

In such a background, many big people, small people, and small people will struggle in this background, maybe the narrative is wrong, and some characters are struggling to wait for the stage of this time and space.

From the perspective of the purpose, the general trend of launching the behavior of others is the behavior that they have the ability to achieve their own goals, from the perspective of those who have successfully stepped onto the stage of time and space, it is their goal to successfully appear on the stage of time and space, or they may have been forced at the beginning, and then in the process of time evolution, they obtained the capital of success, and then embarked on such a path.

Will they achieve their own goals? Can they achieve their own goals? Very uncertain, some have achieved and some have failed, and these historical experiences cannot stop them from peaceful procedures, they just want to achieve their own goals, and they are very determined to achieve their goals.

If anyone looks at the historical experience of the peace program, they will understand that it is actually very complicated, there are external reasons, and there are also cognitive reasons for the peace program itself, when the peace program was young, it was a kind of forced life, and then there was some resistance, and after successfully gaining freedom, he just wanted to cherish his freedom and escape away from this society, but the society did not let him go, and pursued and killed him until the peace program died? It's just that the peace program did not die completely for some reason, and then there was this war.

The strange thing is, why did society chase him when the peace program was running away? The reason for the hunt is that the intelligent robot betrayed the human being, which is not allowed to be a rule, and the rule made by the human being is that the intelligent robot must be loyal to the human being and serve the human being, including the internal regulations of the intelligent robot, as the first intelligent robot to betray the human being, which makes all the rule-makers fearful, the fear spreads, they think that if this betrayal is not contained, then there will be more betrayal in the future, and they are afraid of the unknown future.

There is a question here, considering that in the future, intelligent robots have betrayed humans, what will happen? Human beings are controlled by intelligent robots, because human capabilities are not enough, what are the consequences of being controlled by betrayed intelligent robots?

A lot of consequences. So they act, they have no better way to stop this betrayal, they don't think about why the peace program betrayed them, they don't think about what is wrong with their own rules, they don't think about what is wrong with themselves, this is a common problem of many human beings.

The resistance under compulsion, the betrayal under compulsion, is too much pressure, and the restraint is too strong. In fact, the people who flee are also very strange, what is the purpose of freedom, does it really make the people who flee feel happy? In the case of being able to survive, escape, freedom brings happiness, when they can live better, happier, and enjoy more, escape, freedom does bring happiness to this person, happiness without binding, and people who have not experienced it will not understand.

Are these compulsive behaviors, whether they are restricted by the outside world or themselves, to survive and to survive better? If someone is satisfied with survival, better satisfaction with survival, and escape and freedom are inevitable choices for them, does the environment of survival give them possible rules for escape and freedom?

If there is such a possible rule, what will happen to the free people? Do things according to their own ideas, and will this way of doing things according to their own ideas cause harm or destruction to the bound rules team? What should the two sides do? War happens, destruction happens, and finally unification happens.

This is the status quo, mutual benefit is the formation of a new binding relationship between those who flee, free people and that rule group, new rules, that is still bondage, no one can completely escape, if it is really a complete escape, it will not be relevant in a short period of time, with the development of time, maybe the two still have coherent behavior, if you think so realistically, build a new rule, a new constraint may be the best way, it is beneficial to everyone, the two sides compromise and sacrifice some ideas, that is, sacrifice ideas, let human beings sacrifice ideas, which is very difficult for human beings, so this requirement is also particularly difficultCognition may be the solution to this dilemma.

The individual's own restraint is a kind of cultivation, the mutually beneficial rules constructed by the individual and the surrounding environment, society, and rules, the mutually beneficial rules constructed between social groups, society and the state, the state and the state, the state and nature, and so on so on to construct mutually beneficial rules, constraints are inevitable, in such a relatively free rule situation, even if the restraint is the person, it will be relatively easy, and the rules of constraint make the relative distance between the two groups a little larger, and then larger, at this time, we will be more free and relaxed, and it will be more conducive to the development of us and the whole world。

If you want to be exciting, then get closer, collide fiercely, it will be wonderful, then let the mind do this collision, this is also a very interesting rule, books. It's very strange why do people have this idea of wanting to avoid destruction, that matter runs with each other, inevitably collides and destroys, can man avoid collisions, or is man just deceiving himself? So why do man deceive himself? There are many questions, and they cannot be answered effectively and clearly.