In order to describe phenomena, human beings have formulated some standard definitions, and these standard definitions sometimes confuse human beings' own vision, that is, these standard definitions are not necessarily correct, have limitations, do not express phenomena, and cannot fully describe phenomena. Pen "Fun" Pavilion www.biquge.info

Just like the definition of time, the definition of time does not conform to the phenomenon in the description of the system, time is defined by human beings themselves, in order to describe the phenomenon, and time is not a phenomenon, which sounds difficult to understand, but in fact, time is not a phenomenon, it can be roughly described a change of phenomenon, in fact, time is not a phenomenon.

In this way, it is clear that if the standard definition of human beings is removed, those that are not the definition of phenomena, then it is more able to see the phenomena and see the real phenomena of the world in which we live, which should be understandable, but because it is a human being, the definition of human beings is a social civilization phenomenon of human beings, and it will not be a material phenomenon.

Thinking is the expression of words, and the feeling is like this, with text symbols, we can only have cognition, can we think, whether this is correct, without the expression of words and symbols, do we have cognition? Can we think? Words and symbols are used to describe all the phenomena in the world, our cognition.

I don't know if I don't know words, I won't be able to think, whether I won't know, whether I won't be able to express, so how can some people who don't know words at all express themselves, as if they can still say their own thoughts, what kind of thoughts, cognition?

This kind of cognition is also taught to them, it's not that they don't have cognition, they can correspond some cognition to language, so that a system is formed, and the understanding of their own feelings is also corresponded in this way, using the language that others tell them to describe their feelings, expressing that they are this feeling.

This kind of imitation is still very effective, and the imitation is very powerful, this is a inheritance, accustomed to this kind of life thinking, expressing one's feelings in words, this is another kind of inheritance, whether the literati are inherited in this way, maybe it is like this.

Thinking is to express one's own feelings in words, is this the case? Think about it as it should be, to describe phenomena in words is to think, and this phenomenon has its own external phenomena and its own feelings, so at best it is just to describe phenomena in words, how can it be considered thinking?

Thinking is a process, a process of logical deduction, and is it a process of trying out the essence of a phenomenon? And this essence must be proved by all kinds of evidence, and all kinds of evidence are also known to be correct and true phenomena, and this is such a process.

If thinking is such a situation, then the description of phenomena by words and symbols is a process of recording phenomena, and human beings have recorded many phenomena, and all the phenomena that have been seen by human beings have been recorded and turned into a real cognition, but it may not be an essential cognition.

Then we begin to go deep into the cognitive process, the cognitive process of thinking, to prove the essence through the recorded phenomena, to explore the essential phenomena, which is the process of thinking. So what is the matter with creation, and what is the situation with the tools used by human creation?

The purpose of human recording and cognition of phenomena is to apply, and the purpose of application is to serve human beings themselves, so that the entire human activity seems to be sorted out, is this the process of human intellectual evolution?

That is to say, if this development continues, human beings will definitely understand the world, including themselves, and the application process will also be enriched and developed, for the service of human beings themselves, this process is a bit slow, at present, high-end human civilization recognizes these, and most people do not have these understandings.

Reality will also hinder the development of this process, after all, survival factors, human beings themselves enjoy the pleasure factor, natural factors will hinder the development of this process, but as long as human civilization recognizes these, it will always develop, and the whole will be improved in the development of cognition, as long as human beings do not destroy themselves first.

When a theory emerges, it is always knowing that if you continue to prove it, you will get more things, why don't you prove it yourself, you can know if you continue to go deeper, what you are rejecting, or what you are resisting, whether your own thinking is too complicated, or is it really your own laziness, or the main dynamics are really difficult.

Why don't you want to continue to prove that you don't have confidence in yourself? Or don't you want to go too deep into a certain specialized field, afraid that you will go in like this for the rest of your life, and never be able to get out of it, or are you afraid of the unknown, or rather, there is no emotion that you want to know deeply, there is no motivation to exist, well, it may be so, there is no urge to know very much.

If it appears, I will understand it in depth, it is really like this, and because of this, many things are superficial, there is no motivation to continue to go deeper, it is my own impetuousness, maybe reputation, the consequences of interests not working, so there is really no motivation, but I want to, when I am interested, think about it, this is probably really a problem, maybe or sometimes the effort is not rewarded, naturally I will not do it.

In fact, according to the derivation of distance = constant * relative velocity, the sun, or other matter, may have a halo, and the speed of light is relatively constant, so a strange halo of light revolves around a certain matter, or a huge circular magnetic field ring.

Prophecy should not be like this, through a logical relationship, deduce the possible understanding of the future, this is not a prophecy, but if this is a prophecy, the possibility of prophecy is really believable, if it is really clear a rule, then the prophecy is not impossible.

However, I doubt that this is a kind of prophecy, just deducing the future based on the speculation of the present, or deducing the future according to the things that are determined now, if it is really deduced correctly, it does not mean that the future is predictable, the future is not unknown, it is knowable, but there is no such ability to deduce.

Suddenly, I had the power of faith, the unknowability of the future, it frightened me and fascinated me, but to foresee the future, it was not something I could do, I didn't have the ability, I just had this clear possibility that excited me.

If one can really see the whole evolution, then it is very possible to deduce the follow-up, but now, people will definitely not see the whole evolution, so it is impossible to deduce the follow-up, maybe this is what makes people live a good life, and our emotions like this feeling.

;