Just like some descriptions of scenery, or some descriptions of other details, are considered unimportant, so many are no longer narrated, no longer constructed, and it takes a lot of time and brainpower to construct them, and these descriptions are not on the agenda when there can be other more important narratives.

In fact, there can be a lot of descriptions, just like why people sleep, from a scientific point of view, just say what substances people secrete, and then enter the state of sleep, but more detailed description, why secrete this substance, people enter the state of sleep, if they do not secrete these substances, do not enter the state of sleep, what will happen to people, and so on, this kind of question is raised, and then to find the answer, and the scientific explanation of the phenomenon is a completely different concept, the scientific explanation of the phenomenon is just an initial cognitive state, scientific cognition of the world。

Deeply, it is to change the rule, to find a way to change the rule, and then to do experiments to see what will happen, so that if it is beneficial, to change, and then it is an application, to apply this method of change, so that everything changes the situation.

In fact, what is curious is why we have this ability, this scientific cognitive phenomenon, the ability to think about changing this rule, experimenting, application, this is our innate ability, but many times it is not discovered by ourselves, and after being discovered, it is used by us, at any level.

It is difficult to scientifically understand phenomena, and from the perspective of human cognitive history, this obstacle comes from many places, and cognitive phenomena also need to be constantly experimented and guessed. In the same way, changing this rule, which is also a way of guessing and experimenting, the application is simpler, it has been certified, but it also requires imagination, where it can be used, it is also an experiment, a process of guessing.

Now that we have found a way to operate, a way of operation that belongs to the scientific talent of human beings, we have to think about what it belongs to? Experiment is a kind of action, is based on guessing on the basis of the way to act to verify, of course, the experiment itself is also to guess how to figure out the steps of the experiment, but also the process of guessing first, and then verify, the application itself is already mature, there are already scientific steps to achieve the product, or change the rules, just to think of where this can be applied, of course, it is also the association guess first, and then go to the experiment to see, and then know that this can be used, it can always be used.

These processes all involve guessing, that is, the process of thinking, the process of thinking, the process of being subjective, why can I guess, can I judge that it is feasible? That is on the basis of previous experience, on the basis of logical reasoning, and this kind of reasoning can be pushed forward and backward, so that there are all kinds of ideas.

As for the previous experience, we all know that it is obtained by experimentation, the cognition of the phenomena of the world, and the civilization of this era is more complex and intertwined, so that our innate ability is actually the combination of our own construction and the civilization of the era.

There is nothing to describe in the civilization of the times, it is the wealth of human time, and it will always exist, with human beings, it will not disappear, it will only keep updating, keep improving, until it is in a perfect state, it is a process of continuous ascent, although it is always destroyed by human beings themselves, always abandoned by human beings themselves, but on the whole it still rises.

And the construction of our own body, this body is said to be the result of time evolution, but also a result of us constantly transforming ourselves with civilization, if one day, the construction of our own body can not keep up with civilization, this will restrict the development of civilization, this violent conflict, will there be a phenomenon of civilization eliminating our body, civilization itself autonomously builds a carrier suitable for them, human beings are eliminated, intelligent robots are born, or new humans are born.

Civilization is a whole, her power is very strong, she acts with all individuals, it is difficult for individuals to fight against her, she has correctness, justice, rules, everything conforms to the rules of this universe, why does it conform to the rules of this universe, because the definition of civilization is in line with the rules of this universe, it belongs to the rules of the universe, so we can only conform to her, of course, she has not yet cultivated perfectly, there are all kinds of defects, this is the way?

And human cultivation is to keep up with her pace, not to be eliminated by her, because being eliminated by her means the disappearance of the individual, in fact, this is very strange, why do people have to conform to science, believe in science, follow her footsteps, conform to the rules of the universe?

If it doesn't conform to her footsteps and the rules of the universe, is this possible? Now we can't see it, because we are in the universe, our own birth, and all our actions must be limited by the rules of the universe, the kind of existence that is out of the rules of the universe, which we call unrealistic, illusory, just like we have the idea of reaching anywhere in an instant, if this does not conform to the rules of the universe, it must not exist, it is illusory, but if this conforms to the rules of the universe, then it is possible to achieve.

From the perspective of human imagination, whether the things people think are illusory, unrealizable, and not in line with the rules of the universe, think deeply in this way, and find that what people think is achievable, and can be realized through scientific and technological means, so that what is imagined becomes reality, is a real reality, and is to build an independent space world.

It's really hard to imagine things, but this is really possible, what the hell is going on, but it seems that no matter how you think about it, it can be realized, if people really become creatures that are actively controlled, the current situation is that people are not creatures that are actively controlled, people cannot be controlled in real time, so that emotions dominate people's actions, uncontrollable will appear, so that it is impossible to realize the performance of this independent space constructed.

When it comes to acting, those movies and other performances are not all the virtual worlds formed by the development of human ideas in a controllable state, if technology really develops to that extent, it is really possible to turn these virtual into reality, this is the construction of the real world, with a rule to realize, with a rule to control the plastic energy sphere to form a unique world.

But can the rules really be controlled? Just like whether the rules of the energy sphere can really be controlled, so that this is not a natural behavior, but an evolution of the behavior of the energy sphere controlled by the rules, then what is this? If it really becomes like this, this is more like a divine creation behavior.

There are still a lot of doubts, because the origin of the universe, the origin of the energy sphere and other issues have not been clarified, if it is clear, there will be no such idea, maybe when it is applied, it can really appear that this kind of energy sphere is controlled by a certain restriction rule, forming a new independent space state, but what was it in the first place? Or is this really a natural and inevitable rule, which cannot be manipulated, and this supreme rule cannot be broken, it can only be applied, and in the case of this supreme rule, a new independent space can be constructed.

If this is possible, but everything is not very clear at the moment, and it needs to be verified before the following inferences and actions can be made. There is indeed a big difference between the description of phenomena and the description of subjectivity, the description of phenomena does not do any analysis, but mainly focuses on the detailed description of the reality of existence, and the content is just like the picture seen by the eyes, just the provider of information.

And subjective description, with obvious analysis and I think emotion, is also a kind of information provider, the main thing is how the person who sees it feels, if the person who sees it can clearly distinguish those are the description of the phenomenon and those are the subjective description, then there is no problem, if the person who sees it cannot distinguish the difference between the two at all, it will fall into a kind of passivity, and then interpret the phenomenon on the basis of the subjective analysis of others, so that if the subjective descriptor does not describe the phenomenon truthfully, then the person who sees it may have a lot of problems.

Therefore, for books with subjective descriptions, it is necessary to think about it and not believe it, and it can be confirmed by experiments or investigated. If we don't write books, because books have such a bad side, but if there were no books, what would the world be?

When the book is ambiguous, this is the most uncomfortable, if you are all real, then there is nothing, if you are all illusory, then there is nothing, the key is true and false, then there is a problem, if you don't remind, then it's even more of a problem, but if you remind, it becomes a kind of thinking material, if you want to really figure it out, you will inevitably think about the description in it, and authenticate it.

But why should it be true or false? If it is false, don't describe it, just describe it. If it is a description of the phenomenon, just like a news report, then there is no meaning at all, and people may not be able to analyze the essence in depth due to various cognitive reasons, which makes some books that analyze the essence useful.

Obviously, the analysis is a personal subjective judgment, even some scientific and technological theories are like this, subjectively summarize the results of analysis, so that there is truth and falsehood, in fact, at this time, the person who writes can't tell the difference, just writes it with his own ideas, so if he can't tell it, why write it?

This is a problem, the key is that if he knows that it is false, he will not write, he will not write wrong, the key is that he himself will not know that he is wrong, when he writes, he has always recognized that he is correct, which is the same as the people who do it in reality, the people who build management also think that they are right, and they keep doing it.

If you recognize that you are wrong, you have to do it, there are many reasons, you can't change this is a basic reason, if you don't have this kind of reason that you can't change, you want to take the initiative to do it, that is, for your own personal purpose, you think that it is beneficial to you, even if it is wrong, it is wrong for others, or do it, these are basically more difficult to distinguish, only time to give an answer.

It is impossible for all people to make the same mistake, see the same phenomenon, do the same wrong thing, there are always people who do not do this, and as soon as this comparison appears, many prejudices and mistakes can be clear.

Therefore, to solve the problem of subjective description and error of this book, it is not to abolish the book, nor to let all the people who write it write correctly, in fact, if the person who wrote it knows that it is incorrect, they will not write it, basically many people do not distinguish between right and wrong. Neither of the above methods is feasible, and only by allowing many people to express their own opinions on the same phenomenon can it be possible to compare and analyze relatively correct cognitions.

But the only regrettable thing is that the reality is that it is impossible for a reader to see many people's views on this point of view, but only one author, or some authors' views on this point of view, which leads to cognitive bias, which is also inevitable, so that the writer is required to be a little more comprehensive and comprehensive. It's just a luxury.

Whether you can calmly argue a point of view on your own, instead of arguing against each other, is also a question, and it is not clear why there is such a competitive debate, but under the mood fluctuations, the competitive emotion is at work, and the competitive emotion is also a very peculiar emotion.