How is a person's next action decided, why do people do the next action, why do they choose to do it instead of another action, can people really choose not to do it sometimes, or do other behaviors? Can the behavior be postponed?

The direction of people's next behavior seems to be predestined, no matter what changes occur in the middle, how to struggle, the next behavior is just postponed, or to be completed, just like eating, this behavior is destined to happen, do it yourself, or eat outside, or others do it, in fact, the choice is very limited, from a variety of realities, money, and health, and in fact, in addition to doing it yourself, there is really no choice, people's behavior is doomed, under certain conditions, people's next behavior to complete is doomed.

Under certain conditions, without cooking, without doing a lot of other work, the degree of freedom of choice is greater, and the degree of freedom of the next behavior that can be selected becomes very large, which seems to be like this, but in fact he can choose to choose is also very limited, because there is an optimal choice to do and not to do, he must choose not to do it, because doing it will make him tired, so he chooses not to do it once he optimizes.

According to the most comfortable choice, people with a large degree of freedom of choice will tend to this situation, and people with a small degree of freedom of choice, there is no choice, even if they are tired, they have to do it, in fact, people who have made a choice understand this thing, and they can't resist, once you resist and choose not to do it, you have to pay a greater price, because you are facing your best choice.

If you choose according to your own comfort, in fact, you will enjoy your own life, and if this freedom of choice is created for him, he will not achieve anything, but whether he will become a loser, depending on whether the people who provide for him are doing their best to provide for him, and whether the rules are conducive to providing for him.

If this degree of freedom of choice was built by himself before, his achievements would have stopped at this time, and it would have been up to him to see if the support system he had built before could continue to support him.

And the person who chooses to do something, that is, begins to obtain new achievements, no matter how big or small this achievement, it is always a positive attitude, all this depends on the individual's own choice, all activities of people are to make themselves more free, the degree of freedom of choice is greater, and this degree of freedom of choice is not to make him pay the price in the future.

It's like to be more free to choose, to be corrupt, to commit crimes, to damage your body, to break the rules, in exchange for paying the price later, this just means that those who have already paid the price, those who have not yet paid the price, may really have achieved this degree of freedom expansion.

Are these linked trajectories really a fact? Are they really the trajectories of this world? Are they just one of the trajectories, and the regularities that are seen by others are summed up, and the others that do not form a pattern are automatically ignored or not seen.

The things that we have to be wary of, these cognitions also have the limitations of the times, they may seem correct in this era, maybe there will be better cognitions in the future, this is a precedent, it is considered an empirical cognition, so we must repeatedly certify, instead of taking this as necessarily correct cognition, we must do this in our minds, even if we currently feel that this is correct, we must also set this vigilance in our hearts.

It is very interesting to think that when a person has a good mutation at a certain time, but he marries and has children too early, and can only have one child, then his personal mutation cannot be passed on, and because of this restriction, it will stifle the mutation and evolution of the entire race, many genes of this race are far behind the entire era, and the heritability of genetic variation has disappeared.

This time I don't know why this idea arises, I really can't find the reason, every time I have an idea, I want to find the reason, according to this thinking, I have these thoughts and cognitions, and I want to explore how it came about, and try to recall, this time there is no result, there may be an answer in the dark, and I need to continue to explore until it is clear.

Here, just follow the thoughts and jump out of the text, no matter what you think can compose the text, and when writing the story in an orderly manner, always control the direction, this kind of difficulty is still there, the control itself is more difficult, if a person can control the direction of the text, then controlling their own thinking will not be a problem, is this the difference? Try to control the direction of the text first? Or let the text itself generate with emotions?

This should be when you can control the text generation in an orderly manner, and let the text be generated with emotion in the next step, why do you want to do this, the advantage of this is that the text will not be painful with the emotion generation, and it is a real expression, and it is more likely to produce things that surprise us outside of control.

So why don't you let the emotions be generated from the beginning? If you don't learn to control, you don't know when you are generated, you don't have direction, you have luck, and so on, so you may not learn to control first, and then let the emotions be generated, and then we will be aware, so that we will know more and think more.

It's really more to know, the more difficult it is to produce emotions, but the curiosity about cognition is greatly amplified, addicted to the same, can't let go, when you put down, uneasy, even experience this feeling, but also understand what kind of real feeling others express uneasy, in fact, we go deeper, is a feeling of fear, people's feelings are basically the same, but some expressions are more vague, no further understanding, a feeling conveyed by words, and then the narrative can only understand, yes, experienced, in order to understand what kind of specific feeling the description isAnd some of them may be able to know what the essential feeling is in the experience of others at the beginning, so that the vague feeling, the vague language describes, cannot understand what this is talking about, how can there be any uneasy feeling, isn't it just a feeling of fear? The feeling of fear is the same feeling as the feeling of uneasiness, but the person who describes it may not know what to describe it, or he doesn't know what it feels like, so he narrates it with his mind and is uneasy, and this description is really appropriate.

These vague intermediate words describe, in fact, fear is also an intermediate word description, keep exploring, find the final essence of formation, this is the spirit of scientific exploration, these intermediate words exist, so that the text is full of mysterious feeling, and the same development of these intermediate words is also in line with the law, from the unknown to the use of these intermediate words to describe the answer, in fact, it is considered to have progressed, but also if there is no such cognition, cognition is an intermediate word, just like God exists, it is a kind of intermediate sensory description, you must recognize these, you can understand deeply, even if there is really God, you must explore and find, find confirmationto really understand whether this exists and what this really is.