It's amazing that I suddenly have the feeling of liking false cognitions, but as I used to do, I think deeply about the cognition of emotions and realize that what I like is that I have recognized that this is a false cognition and gained a new correct cognition, which is a sense of joy.

After all, one's own misconceptions are limited, so it is easy to find out that perhaps the misperceptions of others are the basis for one's own thinking, and to think on the basis of these misperceptions that you have not experienced to obtain new perceptions that seem to be correct, will make you happy.

If the world is correctly cognized, it does not mean that you can no longer have a new, correct cognition, this will make you uncomfortable, unable to obtain this joy of acquiring correct cognition, it is difficult to imagine that if other people's cognition is correct, it should be regarded as a terrible world, maybe there is no need to worry about the sky, then it will naturally adapt to such a situation, besides, such a lot of knowledge, it is impossible to know, to learn is enough to learn for a lifetime.

For oneself, after all, there are not many wrong cognitive processes, and it is impossible to have wrong cognitions, and you can't think that others have not experienced them because you have not experienced them, and the wrong cognitions of others will become the basis for thinking about your own new knowledge, and without these wrong cognitions, there will be no new cognitions on top of this.

Thinking about it this way, a lot of misconceptions have become nourishment for new cognitions, but if it is the kind of mistaken perception of reality that causes disaster, this is not what I want to see, maybe this kind of misconception is too costly, and if you continue to make mistakes for a certain reason in the case of recognizing mistakes, it can be regarded as a man-made disaster.

Even if I made a mistake, I found value in my eyes that I could use it, and I found a positive value. It is a pity that the reverse use value, these also exist in reality, in this series of good and bad, how to carry forward the good and restrain the bad, it has become a justice-oriented orderly constraint management scheme.

If the comprehensive wrong cognition is only shown by others in this era, you are just learning from it, and for your own cognition, there is no need to deliberately create false cognition, so that you do not let yourself move forward, but let yourself go backwards.

For the thinker, the wrong cognition is the nourishment of thinking, maybe the end of the thinker is that the cognition is completely correct, which sounds impossible and very far away, as long as human beings are human beings, they cannot do the same level as God, and human beings may be able to realize their own ideas through auxiliary devices.

I always want to write something based on this feeling, what kind of feeling is this, it is an appreciation of false cognition, not an appreciation of the literal understanding, just an appreciation of the whole process, an appreciation of the development of new cognition, and false cognition also constitutes an element of this new cognition, even with appreciation, this is the connection of the existence of things, it is impossible to have no beginning, only the result, and the denial of any beginning is regarded as a kind of wrong cognition.

For the relative velocity is constant, the distance is constant, and a velocity directionality is added, so that there are circles and parallel lines, then if one electron C rotates around the electron nucleus A, and the relative velocity directionality of the other electron nucleus B and electron C is parallel, then the electron nucleus B will appear idling, that is, the electron nucleus B will move in a circle, but not around any core.

If the space electric field is generated in this way, how does the space magnetic field come about? What happens if there is a constant vertical directional distance? If the object is in the center, it will always rotate at a constant relative distance.

What will happen to the matter that is not in the center? There should also be idling, so that there are a lot of substances distributed around the electrons with a relative velocity of the speed of light, and in different directions, the idling is all over this space, and it is not expressed by the name of electric field magnetic field, that is, idle matter, those substances that are defined to distinguish different properties, and the different properties of matter, just say that the parameters of the substance are special, and the parameters, size, velocity, direction, often appear.

Here, once again, all the definitions of human civilization are discarded, and the name is changed, or the phenomenon is restored, and only a phenomenon is seen, and the characteristics of this phenomenon are displayed, and this kind of description is more difficult to describe and not distinguish, but to distinguish with different definitions of human beings, it falls into the limitations of cognition.

Use the simplest parameters to deduce the phenomenon, and those phenomena that are deduced are not defined, just a phenomenon, the phenomenon that appears under evolution, so it seems to return to the basics, simple one, and then evolve into thousands of people, too many human definitions will make the world more chaotic.

But for the sake of cognition, people can't communicate without distinction, they can't effectively memorize and encode, and they don't deduce it every time they communicate, it will be more tiring, so narrated, it is still necessary to distinguish the definition, as long as you know this thing.

What does it become if you escape the definition? That is, if you escape cognition, you can only be an animal-like existence. What about escaping evolution? That should be another kind of existence, which is a completely different concept from cognitive evolution, just like the difference between cognition and doing, cognition is cognition, and success is success, and after success, another phenomenon is displayed, just like escaping evolution, and if you succeed, then you will experience another phenomenon.

I was actually constrained by myself, what am I afraid of, I can't let go of the expression, do I feel that such an expression is naïve or abnormal, isn't it good? That kind of conjecture, why don't I want to write it now, isn't this a novel? How did it become more and more serious, did I really regard myself as a decent person, cherish my feathers, and stop conjecture, what the hell is going on?

Why is this happening, why don't you want to speculate, why do you restrain yourself, why can't you let go of yourself, what will happen if you let go of yourself and write?

What would happen if I had so many people who knew it and wrote like that? Yes, so what? I like to imagine, what else can I do but imagine? Can I write about cognition like I do now? So what?

Imagination should be very comfortable, very refreshing, make yourself very happy, that's for sure, why don't you do it? Why don't you please yourself? Why fall into the trap you have built and struggle? You really can't let go, you have grown up, not your youth, if you are in the same state of imagination as young people, what will happen?

Is it really embarrassing to restrain yourself from imagining? Or is it that you restrain yourself, and you think you should be a role model? It's not my own will, I'm kidnapped by my own morality, but thought is thought, action is action, if you are restrained by your own thoughts, then your assumptions should be irrelevant, it won't hurt anyone, maybe you will get more unexpected cognition, after all, your own imagination and other people's imagination must be very different.