Something domestic
Recently, he has been presiding over the enlightenment of foreign wars, and although he has not paid so much attention to domestic affairs, some information will always fall into his ears by chance. It is not clear where this information comes from, it is difficult to distinguish between truth and falsehood, and some things are logically said to be in the past, and some are easy to see as false.
How to deal with this information, it is not for Enlightenment to manage, he has formulated a management model before, after the organization is huge, the city is freely managed by the city managers, as long as there is income, the income is good, Enlightenment will not pay much attention to the city's management model, and some other cities must abide by the rules monitored by the Xingmen regulatory department of Enlightenment.
Star Gate, the capital city, is also allowed to be managed freely by the Enlightenment. It's strange, what does the Enlightenment control? Finance, military, administration. The army is well understood, and the enlightenment has absolute command over the army, and it is also nurtured by the enlightenment, and the enlightenment conducts training, and the enlightenment formulates the management model.
Enlightenment has absolute appointment and dismissal power over the central administration, the management model is also formulated by Enlightenment, and the personnel are also raised by Enlightenment, mainly to review the planning plan of the subordinate cities, and send people to conduct on-site inspections to the city as a whole for assessment, and to assess the city's senior management.
Enlightenment also has absolute power to appoint and dismiss the central finance, absolute control over income, and absolute right to formulate revenue methods. From these appearances, the Enlightenment was quite dictatorial because there was an absolute right to control. In fact, the Enlightenment must exercise these absolute powers in accordance with its own laws, and the Enlightenment cannot be capricious.
Just like the administration, all the systems have been formulated and constrained by the legal system, and the financial system has also been formulated and constrained by the legal system. However, the assessment method of administration and the specific control of finance are the choices made according to the research of scholars in various fields.
And the army, based on the research of some staff members or scholars in this field, has been willful a few times, and has made several willful choices, including administratively and financially, and has been willful in enlightenment. But many times it is a scientific and rational choice, and it is those scholars who make scientific choices based on these after research.
The right to enlightenment is great. It's really big, he can really make choices willfully, he has the right to choose, and no one dares to stop him from choosing willfully. This is very deadly, and it is also the budding bed of total dictatorship, and if the right to enlightenment, a wayward choice, is restricted, limited by the Constitution, it may be a good start.
The Enlightenment must be subordinated to the Constitution. The constitution stipulates that people are equal, and enlightenment must refer to this when making choices, and if enlightenment is willful and breaks through this provision, then enlightenment must be punished, prosecuted, or restricted, and the arbitrary choice of enlightenment, this order will be vetoed.
In this way, under such a system, regardless of whether the person in this position is a bad person or not, will be constrained, and the constitution will regulate the choices made by people in this position, whether it is administrative, financial, or military choices, all of which are restricted, and people in this position cannot make arbitrary choices, and if they do not conform to the constitution, this choice will be vetoed and cannot be implemented.
Having said so much, in fact, the Enlightenment did not have a constitution, and there was such an understanding in his knowledge tree, but he felt that this was too uncomfortable, he was restricted, how could he do wayward things, the Enlightenment wanted to find himself, he needed to make a willful choice, start a war or something.
Of course not, some of the constitutions are aimed at the supreme interests of the state, and sometimes the enlightenment will be allowed to wage war, as long as it complies with the provisions of the constitution, in fact, sometimes people are very clever to look for loopholes in these constitutions, and then they can go back and forth at will, which is very interesting.
Sometimes, these people are needed to help experiment with the loopholes in the Constitution, but many times the experiment will destroy a lot of things, and the cost is really a bit big, at this time, the group of people who defend the Constitution must always be vigilant against this wayward person, and veto his willful choice before he makes a willful choice and a catastrophic experiment.
Some of the circulating information that Enlightenment got by chance was that all women were to be conscripted, and it was not clear who came up with it, and Enlightenment also fell into thinking when he heard this information, because this is completely opposite to reality, and war is mostly a man's thing, and it has been like this for many years.
Men can never experience how women feel when they give birth to children, and women have a very big fear of pain because of the reason for giving birth, these fear genes are inherited from generation to generation, women are not suitable for war, they are afraid of many things, and they feel that they are also the richest, and there is maternal love or something, men are more ruthless, suitable for war, and enlightenment gives a more reasonable explanation for themselves.
In addition, there is the information transmitted from the financial level, saying that there are many private organizations involved in financial operations, just like fund management or something, raising private money, making investments, and making money to share a part of the money to those who invest, and earn a part of it themselves. Will this affect the finances of the central government?
As long as the tax is in, you will get what you should get, and you have to pay taxes to make money from these investments, which does not affect your income, and the financial regulatory system can do a good job to prevent these people from evading taxes, and you have to pay taxes for proper fund management, and people who operate in financial operations are the easiest to evade taxes, and they also know the most about these ways to avoid taxes.
As I said, a lot of laws have been set, and enlightenment is not easy to change anything, these accidental information, enlightenment just thinks about it, he can't change anything, enlightenment will find a better reason to explain, he automatically ignores those bad reasons to explain, this thinking should be incorrect, to think about bad reasons, to prevent, to act.
The constitution and laws change very slowly, and it is difficult to change, but the enlightenment is always changing, his thoughts are changing, his feelings are also changing, and the most important thing is that the content of his memories is also like this, the activation of enlightenment memories is not all parallel and eternal, so it is not that enlightenment forgets memories, but that if there is no activation, those memories of enlightenment do not appear, so the choices made, or the things promised may be forgotten by enlightenment.
Some just remember, but because they can't see the current situation clearly, they will make a choice to break their promises. This is people, people's memory structure is imperfect, and it feels more perfect, this feeling can't be said, because there are both right and wrong, so there is this feeling, everything has both positive and negative sides, coupled with the uncertainty of the future, it is normal for us to have such a feeling, the feeling is right, the feeling is wrong, this is the feeling.
Although the managers of the city are for their own interests, the management model is basically the same, that is, to develop the city and collect money. The way is completely different, which has led to a lot of magical urban construction phenomena, which are said to be based on the characteristics of citizens to collect money and develop management methods.
Arriving from one city to another, the visual sensation is very impactful, and the existence of these appearances confuses others, as well as the citizens of the city, making them feel that the people who manage them are different from the managers of other cities.
Enlightenment does not pay attention to these chaotic appearances, no matter how they toss, they cannot get rid of the rules of management, the money in their hands will reach enlightenment through various ways, and the ultimate goal is this, in addition, they are only temporary freedom, when enlightenment wants them to have no freedom, they have no freedom.
This is the difference between dictatorship and constitutional management, although under the management of the constitution, the rules of management are still like this, people still have to give the money in their hands to the state, but this money is not at the disposal of the dictator, it is governed by the constitution, if the constitution is for the citizens here, then things are different. And freedom is not governed by dictators, but by the constitution, and if the constitution is for the citizens here, things are completely different. The question of who formulated the constitution and the standards it formulated is also very important, depending on who the constitution is directed towards, and as for the laws that follow, they are all based on the constitution, so the constitution is directed to whomever the law is directed towards.
I believe that enlightenment is really to use the constitution to manage, he must find a way to make the constitution towards himself, so that enlightenment can be capricious, as for the later can be improved, to make a pit for the person who takes over the position of enlightenment, so that he has no way to be capricious, but these managers will have their own ways to make the rules fall to their side, after all, they are intellectually higher than many people, and those people can't see the small actions of these people.
Therefore, what the framers of the constitution and researchers have to consider is how these smart people change the constitution and how to bypass the constitution to make laws, and these smart people must not have any chance to do so, so that they can maintain purity, but time can really corrode eternity in various ways, which is also the problem of eternal life.
The country of enlightenment is these messy things, that is, there are people who oppose the dictatorship of the enlightenment, and there are people who oppose the war, and this enlightenment does not pay special attention, and the managers of those cities do not pay attention to it, and for the managers of the cities, they are not concentric with the enlightenment, they are also managed.
Enlightenment doesn't matter, it doesn't mean that those researchers, scholars don't care, they feel that such behavior will affect the country, affect the authority of enlightenment, so they suggest enlightenment, or enlightenment management to control, some of the analysis of the truth is very reasonable, enlightenment listened, think about it is also right, in fact, these truths are all the words of a family, it is a problem of angle, it seems to be to maintain enlightenment, but in fact it is wrong, but let enlightenment fall into a pit, if enlightenment can not be effectively distinguished, it will eventually fall into the pit.
The person who made the decision cannot go back and make a decision again, and after making it, there is no opportunity to make up for it, and it cannot be made up.