If you don't know how this is generated, this universe is like a running program written for yourself, and it is a running program of an endless loop, and how matter is also trapped in such an endless loop, and only matter exists after rotation, otherwise matter does not exist, which is incredible.

The phenomenon that unfolds in front of us is that matter exists, which is determined, and matter is rotating, which is also determined, and if the two are unified by the rule that the relative velocity is unchanged and the relative distance is constant, then there will be an unsolvable fact, an endless loop.

This question is also not right, there is no rotation without matter, and this cycle is so desperate. How exactly to solve such a problem, or this is not explained, matter exists, matter rotates, and they show that they follow a unified theory, the relative velocity does not change, the relative distance does not change.

This is unscientific and wrong, why does matter exist? Matter follows a unified theory, so there is a phenomenon of rotation, why does matter follow a unified theory?

Of course, this unified theory is only defined by me, and it is summarized according to the phenomenon, and you can leave this theory, then the real phenomenon is the existence of matter? Why can matter exist? Halo, and then run back into the endless loop, because the unified theory exists, it produces matter, and only then does the phenomenon of material rotation occur.

There is another world, where matter rotates faster than the speed of light and goes to another world, and matter is visible relative to the speed of light, so it is perfect. But why is this theory correct, and even if this theory is really correct, and it is confirmed by phenomena, why does this universe exist, and why does this world exist like this?

That is to say, there is still a problem with this theory, after all, it has not been proven, then there is a problem, if this theory derives such a result. If it's real, it's correct, then it's going to make people crazy, why does it exist? It's just such a question, leaving the whole world in a state of insolvency.

If I say that it is because of our existence that the world we observe is such a phenomenon, that it is not very mysterious, that is not very idealistic, then how can I understand the world, transform the world, and transform the world according to our ideas, but can we change this theory that the relative speed is constant, the distance is constant? If not, the world still runs definitely, we just know the rules and make use of the rules.

When we go from why to what, have we really reached the limit of our understanding? Or is there some secret hidden in this, the secret of the birth of the universe, maybe not the secret of the birth of the universe, but the secret of the existence of the world.

If this is the ultimate secret, then when the matter of the other universe exists without rotation, how will the people in it summarize this law, they will think that it is correct that matter exists, and that matter will show a kind of law of operation, like a straight-line operation rule, if this is the unified rule of the world over there, then will they say that as long as matter moves in a straight line, matter exists, because that is also a phenomenon manifested in their universe.

However, it is difficult to imagine what strange universes will appear under the reality of the existence of matter under the influence of a certain unified rule.

If the rules can be arbitrarily formulated, and under the premise that matter exists, and matter is visible relative to the speed of light, then the universe is not all strange, and the rules of each world are different, but the world follows the universal rule that matter is visible relative to the speed of light, because then there is a theoretical basis for the existence of other worlds, and there is an explanation for the existence of matter.

Whoever is making the rules of the universe, who is unifying the rules of the universe, who is the maker of the rules of this universe, disturbing the entire universe from the moment of enactment, so that the universe must operate according to such rules, if this is the case, it is really a very strange world.

It's time to stop, you can't think like that, even if it's right, it's terrifying, if all the universes are worked out like this, then idealism exists, it's a terrible thing, speculation is incorrect after all, it needs to be confirmed by phenomena, it needs to be confirmed by real phenomena, and it is dangerous to guess like this, or it needs to be confirmed in the future.

Why should the future be confirmed, why not the present, with the present phenomenon, but the present phenomenon is not visible, then why is it invisible, and the visible phenomenon becomes a definite phenomenon, just as it is terrible to change the structure of this universe in an instant, the structure of the universe is changed by idealism, and it changes in that instant?

If this is a rule recognized in each world, what would it be, except to make matter visible at the relative speed of light that matter exists, otherwise it will appear in another world, and all worlds still exist in the idealistic unity of the rules that make rules to change the rules of the universe in an instant, and unify the rules of the universe in this world.

So who made these kinds of rules in the worlds? It's really a troublesome thing, and if it can't be deduced in this way, it needs to be confirmed, and it needs to be confirmed, but how can it be confirmed, how can it be confirmed? I feel so powerless, and I have to find a way to prove it, this is the limitation of this era, and it is impossible to deduce it, the phenomenon is not confirmed enough, and the speculation cannot be regarded as reality.

When we ask the universe why, we don't get the answer, we ask ourselves why, and then we think of ways, we think about how to answer why, we do experiments to answer why. We can only ask ourselves and think about why the universe makes rules, why it can't be broken, and how to crack it.

All of this, the universe shows us phenomena, even experiments are phenomena shown by the universe, and the answers we get are the answers given by the phenomena of the universe, the answers given by the universe, and then we know, as it is, what rules the universe follows.

In this way, we are cognizing the universe, but we also ask why we want to change it, but we have not fully understood the universe, so why can we change the rules of the universe?

Therefore, we still have to recognize the phenomenon of the universe, just like the rotating electron, if the rotation speed of the electron is the speed of light, in our opinion, why is the volume so small, it means that the relative velocity of the outer and inner linear velocities of the electron is actually relatively small, so that we can explain why the relative velocity is unchanged, the distance is constant, and why the electron is small.

By changing the rotation speed of a substance, turning a low-speed rotating substance into a high-speed rotating substance, and turning a high-speed rotating substance into a low-speed rotating substance, this will all occur a phenomenon, the phenomenon of mass becoming larger and smaller, and the phenomenon of volume becoming larger and smaller.

Assuming that these conjectures are correct, I have not done experiments to verify them myself, but I can deduce some existing phenomena, and I think that this may be correct, so I will directly use them to deduce and use them. Or if these guesses are correct, there is still an endless loop like the one mentioned at the beginning, who set this rule, and why must it be followed.

Even if such a rule is followed, why matter should rotate, why matter should rotate, you can do without rotation, without revolution, linear motion is also possible, linear motion of substances colliding with each other, will eventually form this rotation, revolution mode, because this mode of matter has high hardness, not easy to be defeated, and has the effect of waves, the probability of being collided is also reduced a lot, from instability to stable architecture, if this rule is true, then whether there is such an evolutionary process of rules, and the final appearance of unified rules is only the result of stability, maybe the rules in the world appear randomlyAfter stabilization, what is presented may be a unified rule, so that it can make sense, so as long as the rules you want to get, it may appear, is this really the case?

Now there are a lot of ideas in the mind, or don't narrate, these ideas are so bizarre, people themselves are amazing enough, some things still need to be thought clearly before expressing, so that they will not be confused.