Some things are completely beyond your own experience, just like if you don't arrive in a certain city, you will always think that what happens in the city you are staying in is something that is happening in other cities, but unfortunately it is not true, just like there are no beggars in some cities, I don't know how to do it, some don't have chengguan, it's not clear what's going on, some don't have buses in the second half of the night, only taxis are active, if you don't go to see this, you won't find out that there really is such a thing, and there are many things that you can't believe, so going out for a walk is good for yourself。

The disgust of the rule of cannibalism embodies one's own sense conception, and the same one who rejoices in this rule also embodies his own sense concept, and which of the two is correct? From the point of view of justice, speed is correct, and from evil point of view, speed is wrong.

But who is right? Judging from the evolution of time, whoever still exists in the end is right. This frame of reference is still really peculiar, the rule of cannibalism has become history, and the rule of cannibalism is not suitable for this universe, it is incorrect, it is a rule that exists for a short time, then there is actually a frame of reference, a more fair frame of reference, and the rule of eternal existence is correct.

Why is it not the rule of ephemeral existence that is correct, but the rule of eternal existence that is correct? This is also subjectively added by man, for man, eternity is right, ephemeral is wrong, unsuitable, is the rule of elimination? What is the idea of the person who has the law of natural elimination, because he thinks that the law of natural elimination is correct, and on this basis he can infer the eternal and the transient existence, which one is correct?

If it is correct to remove this law of natural elimination, then it is impossible to judge whether eternity is correct or ephemeral is correct? In this way, we will be clear that the original right and wrong are only the subjective judgments of human beings, and the subjective thinking of most people that is correct becomes a relatively correct judgment, and whether such a judgment is correct?

But what if we know this, what is the case? What is always necessary to move forward, always to make a kind of human judgment, and more human judgment is based on experience, human history, and so-called scientific experiments, and on this object of comparison, and the correct meaning is defined by reference to the eternal existence of human beings.

That is to say, under the premise of such a definition, this is not a hypothesis, but a frame of reference, and the correctness of this setting is determined by whether everyone agrees to be correct, and perhaps a large number of normal people agree to be correct, and then this frame of reference can be used. If you don't want to think of this as a frame of reference, you have to find a frame of reference that defines human correctness.

Otherwise, there is no frame of reference, there is no unified rule standard, then no one's subjective correctness judgment, how people are correct, such a setting, is not beneficial to people themselves, disorderly and chaotic human world frame of reference, in that way, it is only a self-sustaining frame of reference in this universe, this is a natural frame of reference setting, has nothing to do with people, does not recognize that people have active behavior, intelligent behavior settings, and regards people as animals, as material frame of reference settings.

In fact, this feeling makes people uncomfortable, so if they follow the feelings that people themselves have, and there is a contradiction, then people feel incorrect, and since people feel that they are incorrect in their feelings, but they admit that it is correct, isn't this a violation of this self-sustaining frame of reference? Because if you admit that the frame of reference of self-destruction is correct, then when you feel incorrect and uncomfortable, this setting is denied, and since it has been denied, then this frame of reference is incorrect.

Since correctness is defined by people, and people subjectively think that it is correct, then based on the fact that if people subjectively feel that it is incorrect, then this definition of correctness is incorrect, so that the ultimate basic point of setting the frame of reference still returns to the feelings of people, the feelings of the majority, the feelings of the majority of people about a certain correctness frame of reference, if they feel that it is correct, and thus it is correct.

After narrating it for so long, if we admit that human feelings are legitimate, that they are gifts from nature, that they are the result of evolution, and that they are the foundation of human existence, then the existence of human feelings is correct, scientifically speaking, the existence of human feelings is correct, and the existence based on this feeling is correct, and that person's general feeling of the frame of reference for correctness is correct, that is, the correctness of the setting, just as people admit that science is correct, and it is impossible to say what it is, that is, most people, according to experience, feel that science is correct and feel that it is correct, then admit that this is correct, and in the end people still follow their feelings。 After the use of science in the weapons of war, some people felt that it was incorrect, and now they only feel that the use of science is incorrect.

If the feeling can be fully recognized, it is an unimaginable scientific breakthrough, and it is a scientific and technological civilization that can actively use matter to create intelligent creatures like man.

If we admit that people's feelings are correct, that they recognize the correctness of people's feelings, and perhaps that most people's feelings are correct, this is not as simple as rationalism, but only that we recognize the correctness of the feelings of most people, then it may be the most correct and most in line with the laws of the universe.

We only talk about feelings, we admit that people's feelings are all right, we produce certain feelings, and then under various cognitive conflicts, we feel that we should do this, it's all feelings at work, our feelings, we feel like we're going to do this, we produce some kind of feeling, it's all real, what reason, in fact, it doesn't exist, but we produce feelings, we feel that we have to do this, it's such a very simple process, what is the situation that blinds us, makes us feel that our feelings are wrong, is it materialismIs it science, is it mathematics, is it logic?

It is our cognition that is wrong, there is an abominable cognition that suddenly appears in our senses, preventing us from thinking that the sensations are correct, that he is like a demon, that makes our senses stagnate, that is, that he is rational, which is called materialism, that is, a kind of mechanical materialism, that our feelings are unscientific, not correct, and because of this, we doubt our feelings, and thus our feelings are lost, we are no longer ourselves, we do not feel our existence, we think that we ourselves are wrong, as soon as we have our own feelings, we think that we ourselves are wrong, and thus we become neurological patients.

I don't know how this demon came about, but in reality he exists, he denies all our own feelings, he makes us think that our feelings are incorrect, only his perception is correct, only he is the existence of truth, everything is different from him, all the cognitions that are different from him in our feelings are wrong, they are all incorrect, they should not exist, this demon, this dictator of thought, this imprison of thought, let us die completely.

Human beings are right to pursue a good life, it is the feeling we want, but when this feeling of ours is taken advantage of, deceived by someone who says that they will achieve our good life by doing so, we give up everything, including our feelings, our lives, our spirits. By doing what they think, we can achieve our good life deceived by them, and perhaps they themselves are deceived by their feelings, is this excusing them? I don't know, maybe they knew from the beginning that this was a scam, all the people were deceived, all the good people were deceived, disaster happened, and that's okay, now we only believe in our own feelings, look at all the hypocritical liars in this world, we no longer believe in them, we no longer believe in those leaders, we no longer believe in those so-called rules and rewards and so on, this is how we feel.

And this demon may not have just been created, it may have always existed, it is the so-called leader, the so-called system of rules, the so-called dark culture under civilization, anything that has no legitimate reason to hinder our sense of wanting to act is not correct, it is the existence of the demon.

A dark cultural narrative is that this is our desire, that we are to restrain our own desires, that he sets a knife inside us and cuts through our feelings, and that another dark cultural narrative leads us to paranoid destruction, that we are not right, that our desires feel right, that we go for the realization of this desire and let go of the other of our feelings.

I think I just don't listen to them, I just have to act according to what I want to do, and this feeling of acting is what we think is the right feeling, that we don't kill people, that we follow the rules that we have set together, that we don't go beyond it, because we know it's good for us.

I'm afraid this is only for me, only after I have so much cognition, I am qualified to do so, and I will reach a civilized world of my own, and this civilized world of my own may be realized in the future, maybe only for me.

It seems that the degree of civilization is related to personal cognition, not determined by other circumstances, not technology, nor other material determination, only related to personal cognition, and how individuals form cognition, which is obtained by individuals by thinking about themselves and the real world, personal cognition is their own sensory cognition, is a unique personal sensory experience, you feel correct, then it will become your personal cognition, no matter how this feeling is generated, maybe it is your own thinking and comprehension, maybe it is touched by other people's behaviors and books。

A lot of things are useless to you, unless you can take us to do it, this sentence is for all the readers who see this, just like if you take me to experience the feelings, you take me to the material, you take me to the spirit, you take me to your height, you take me to the fame and power that you have now, you take us to our good life, otherwise what you say is of no use, for me, it is useless, maybe if you can give me a motivation to act, to get what I want, this is also useful, otherwise everything is useless, for me, it is all like this。

I hope I am useful, not useless in your eyes, just a bunch of text garbage, if it is useless, please leave me, don't be bound by the rules, act according to your feelings, maybe this sentence will be useful, for you, it will be useful.