Access to the world's information network through the peace program, Winter found a few online rental houses, of course, this city, what to do in the future, has been planned, Winter is looking for these are all after comprehensive consideration.

There are too many online intermediaries, which is a problem for ordinary people, they prefer to go directly to the field to find, and the peace program easily bypasses these intermediaries and finds the information that Winter wants, and when Winter experiences these lives, he does not have any records, these are all white sketch records of the peace program, and it is impossible for Winter to record his own experience in parallel while experiencing life.

People who are not separated from emotions will be in the same situation as Winter, and only those who separate emotions from reason can record emotions like a peaceful program, and emotions are feelings, and feelings are the touch of information from the outside to human beings.

It's a pretty incredible thing, if it's separated, is this still a human being? Isn't it an intelligent robot? Or an intelligent biological robot, it's possible, if the human brain can run in parallel and orderly, then it's possible, if the human brain can't run in parallel and order, it can only run in a single thread, then it's not possible.

The generation of emotions is a very normal behavior, it cannot be prevented, nor can it be made to die instantly, take unhappy emotions as an example, after they are generated, they really can't be eliminated, and why do you want to eliminate her, people always want to be happy, that's why you want to eliminate unhappy emotions.

In fact, it is also very strange to eliminate, and the elimination may not be there for a period of time later, but sometimes it will be completely triggered, especially when it is triggered, it is very clear to recall, and this has the effect of amplification, making people's emotions more out of control, this way of linking is really magical.

Winter Jue's realistic description is that this community is a little broken, and this kind of breaking is not the relationship between time, but the relationship between quality, quality, and property in the community. If you don't realistically describe it, these are some tall buildings, magnificent, and the greenery is well done, so it's really strange to describe it like this, isn't this a realistic description?

Could it be that the community is broken is the real description of reality, and the grandeur of the real community buildings and the greening are not real, both of which are amplifications of the local reality description of the community.

The real white description is the most objective and realistic description, just write what is there, what is there, what is there, it can be a tree, it can be a person, it can be a building, it can be garbage, it can be an animal, etc., this kind of description makes people not interested, which is also very strange, why is there no interest?

The main thing is that some of the text is white text, and some are emotional words, just like "breaking" which carries human emotions, so it is expressed in words, if you can't make these distinctions, it becomes a mix and match, there is no purity, and the white drawing is closer to the truth, but after all, the white drawing is also a human description, and there will always be some details missing, or exaggerating a little detail, which is basically impossible to verify, and it is different from real-time video.

It's just that if the real-time video is also for people to see, then there will be deviations, there should be a very magical development here, a person's white description of reality, may add a little unreal, or lack a little detail, and then see the person described by this person added a little unreal, or a deviation in understanding, or also missing a little detail, when he narrates, or re-describes, it changes, just like the appearance of rumors, this is determined by the nature of human beings, this human nature, or the criminal behavior caused by human characteristics, it is really not clear, maybe it is not a subjective crime, not a conscious criminal behaviorMore often than not, it is caused by human characteristics.

In this way, how to restrain this kind of human character has also become a kind of research content, and the kind of prescribing that this kind of human characteristic is manifested as a crime, this is not a study of the characteristics of human beings, but only an act of coercing and oppressing human nature, and it is the use of another characteristic of human beings to approve the characteristics of another human person.

Indoctrination may be another milder way of restricting people's characteristics, but if the way is not right, it cannot play a role in restraint, perhaps the content of educational work research is this, the realization of the way of education is based on the study of human characteristics and formulated, to restrain people's bad characteristics, invisibly restrain them, but is this possible?

Just a little change, you can get more cognition after thinking, Winter and the peace program for the same white drawing record, the resulting thinking cognition is different, according to the current situation, the peace program produces a little more, after all, the peace program is specially made for thinking intelligent robots.

It's tiring to look at the problem from someone else's point of view, and soon, Winter doesn't want to look at it, whether it's a white drawing record or a peaceful mental record, Winter is not a thinker, he is just a person who wants to achieve his own goals, or a person who has his own ideas, and does things according to his own ideas.

In Winter's eyes, this kind of description, in fact, wants to be narrated in Winter's heart, or in Winter's thoughts, but when it is written, it is expressed in Winter's eyes, and the meaning in this eye is greater, why is this literal expression like this? Many people may not be able to understand this expression, in the eyes, how can this expression refer to Winter's heart?

I just thought of using such an expression, if it was really explained, or a more academic expression was used, then the novel would not be a novel, it really didn't look like a novel, so what was it more like? I don't know, this is a novel, or even if it's a combination of words, there is no type of expression at all, it's just a literal expression.

This explanation is really right, it is just a combination of words, and the combination of words is thought, that is, the expression of a person's heart, words constitute a person's cognitive heart, and if the feeling cannot be described in words, it is just a feeling, the inner feeling, the inner feeling that cannot be described in words, is always a secret belonging to the individual, and for the individual, that feeling is also a secret, generated, can not be distinguished, recognized, and cannot be expressed in words.

Aside from the combination of words, the conscious arrangement of the content of the novel, or the description of the story, what is this? It is an application, an application of words, an application of sensory elements, or in the construction of art, or it has always been an expression of the heart, it may be the identification of cognition, using another angle to find new cognition, perhaps using other people's vision to find new cognition, because after all, in reality, the cognition found only from one's own perspective is limited, there are limitations, and it is a real-time response, no feeling, and it is impossible to face the real-time sensory conflict, the cognition of a conflict in the perspective of others, and the dilemma encountered。

The way of dealing with the same problem may be different for everyone, and the way the person who writes about the problem is only his own, so that through the perspective of others to create realistic conflicts, find more problems, find more cognition, and the way of dealing with writing really belongs to the person who wrote.

Maybe it can't be said that way, because the scenes of other people's perspectives conflicting, the problems they see, and the cognition may not be the same as the person who writes, they are all the cognition of the person who writes, so it is clearer, in fact, they all belong to the cognition of the person who writes, the way of dealing with problems, looking for new problems, new conflicts, and new cognitions.

It's just a way to achieve this project, a way to achieve such a purpose, which is also at the beginning, I didn't think of it, I didn't summarize it, but in the process of doing it, I accidentally found such a rule, and summarized it out, and then I guided myself to continue to do it in this way, and do it more clearly, is this summary good or bad?

For the person who writes, it really can't be said, it just appears naturally, it is summed up, after it is felt, it is naturally described, it can be said that after a kind of inspiration appears, it is naturally summarized, and what to do later, maybe it will not be done, or in fact, there is no need to be so clear, the person who writes it is still written like this, he just writes, just describs, just thinks, just continues, and there is nothing consciously to do according to those laws.

Is it good to summarize it in this way? The person who writes may be clear about his own running state, and the person who reads may be clear about the state of the person who writes, and may imitate it and try to learn. Is there anything else? When summed up in this way, it becomes a binding rule, a rule.

In fact, the person who writes has never followed these rules and regulations, or consciously followed these rules, he is just writing, thinking, and doing according to his feelings, so it is very simple, after the cognition appears, it naturally becomes a kind of cognition of the person who writes, and becomes a feeling that grows in the heart of the person who writes, but the person who writes, has always been just writing, thinking, and describing according to feelings.

Saying never, this may also be a wrong expression, sometimes after a good idea comes out, just like these are summarized, the person who writes consciously tries to do so, just like the application of various techniques, just try to apply it, to feel it, and then according to past experience, after trying to apply, there will be something to gain, indeed, it has always been correct, and it is indeed gained.