I know a lot, but I still can't change anything, even if I know the principles of those phenomena, it is only the principles of those phenomena, unless I can copy them, so I think about it, it is also right, if this phenomenon is scientific and correct, then I should be able to copy it, so that I can also be in that phenomenon.

The world is so big, how can this phenomenon of life be copied, the conditions are much worse, and it is not a small commodity that can be copied, even if it is copied, it may not necessarily show the same hot sales pattern in the whole world, this is too big to be reproducible, scientific nature cannot be reflected in this, this is the powerlessness of science, and because of this, this world is beautiful, and the world that can be copied out, that makes people feel hopeless when they think about it.

I heard that immortals have great abilities and can replicate this world, so no one may be lucky in this world to become an immortal anyway, but it is just a kind of luck luck, because if someone becomes an immortal, they will not let others know.

What can we do to understand the principles of so many phenomena? What can we do? Since life cannot be copied, what can we do? What can science do? When asked about this, reality has made many people feel the role of science, so the role of science is valuable to mankind.

Some people say that what is useful to oneself is valuable to oneself, and what is useless to oneself is worthless to oneself. If we think about it, what will we find?

The previous sentence is useful to oneself is valuable to oneself, which is very correct, just like creating an object to come out, like what you want to do, these are all useful to yourself, all of them are valuable to yourself, just like I wrote this novel, it is useful to myself, it is valuable to myself.

When we create an object, the object is useless to ourselves, but the item is useful to others, then the item has value, because it is possible that we can exchange the item for someone useful to us, and the value is realized, like this item can be exchanged for money.

So when you create an item, the item is not useful to you, you create it, because you see that the item can be exchanged for the valuable item you need, but you have to exchange the item for the valuable item you need in order to realize its value.

This is to find a buyer, this is very important, very important, otherwise you will not be able to realize your own value, this item has no value for you, and it cannot be sold, then this item is equivalent to no value, of course, if you create a piece that is useful for yourself, and useful for others, then the value of this item is bursting.

In this process, the condition of finding a buyer for the item is very important, without this, when you create an item that is not useful to yourself, the value of the item cannot be realized, and the business cannot be realized, this seems to be a very simple truth, but who can use this truth to realize it in reality? That is also the truth to find a buyer, realize their own value, the truth to achieve their own value, this is very cute, very interesting, the person who wrote this truth, the person who created this truth can realize his own value? Did he create this truth to sell it for money? If it wasn't for selling money, was it worth it to himself? If he realized value with it, then what could he say?

The replicability of the phenomena of the big world, the replicability of science lies in the universality of this principle, which can be copied by anyone who sees it, which is the scientific replicability of economic laws, social sciences and the like.

So why do some people just know this truth, why they still don't want to use it, they still want to use the rules, why? This is also a phenomenon, a real phenomenon, and there are also scientific truths in it, and they can be seen and copied, and they all exist scientifically.

To find these scientific existences is to find the existence of reason, in order to find a solution, but since this is scientific, why should we solve the scientific phenomena? This is to use these scientific phenomena to form a scientific existence that is beneficial to man, just like combining them into an orderly commodity.

It is beneficial to people, it depends on who is beneficial, scientific phenomena can also serve any object, after realization, you can serve the corresponding object, scientific phenomena that are beneficial to everyone, if this is the case, then you can also find a combination of scientific phenomena that are beneficial to everyone.

But people are very strange creatures, it is impossible to achieve benefits for everyone, because people are divided into good and evil, good people are good, evil is unfavorable, so there is a contradiction, and evil seems to be only beneficial to a small number of people, so always build a combination of justice, in fact, it does not seem to be so ideal, the number of people on both sides should be about the same, maybe in fact, there is evil in everyone's hearts, if they are not punished by any evil, people's evil will be fully manifested, because such people seem to be very happy。

Also because of the existence of the rules of justice, when the evil people show evil, they are suppressed and punished, which makes people have to restrain a lot of evil, and the relative justice of the performance, which is also very interesting, the evil under the rules because of the consideration of their own interests, the relative justice of the performance, that human nature is really evil?

There is a lot of evidence that no, if the realization of one's own interests is not regarded as evil, people are not so evil, under the rules, the legitimate realization of one's own interests, the acquisition of one's own interests, this is not considered evil, then many people are not considered evil.

Don't study these, think about the definition of fate, if you define that adults want and give up freely, this is a person who controls his own destiny, so that people can crack their own destiny and take the initiative to control their own destiny, but if the whole environment is added, the narrative is under certain rules, and they still insist that their own principles and choices are to dominate their own destiny, then such people can be regarded as able to dominate their own destiny, and those who succumb under the rules are not considered to be able to dominate their own destiny.

Further, if you want or don't want to be the result of material interaction, then from here, it is impossible for a person to be the one who dominates his own destiny, and is affected by the material of the whole world.

If we look for how the material of this world works, then we may finally find out who determines all the fate of the material, and if we look for it again, what else can we find? What should we find, and if we can really find the most primitive fate agent, can we control our own destiny?

It's hard to say, as I said, this world is so big, and it is difficult to replicate such a big world scientifically, unless it can really be simulated by that primitive fate agent, and your own existence data can be obtained, so that you can resurrect yourself infinitely.