Miscellaneous Essay - Wrong but Can't

I know that I am wrong, and I want to change it, but time has passed, mistakes are still being made, it may not be a mistake, it is a mistake that cannot be reached to meet the standard, unable to achieve a certain standard, how to work hard, speaking of which, it is really not how hard to work, maybe the direction of the direction is wrong, the direction of the effort is wrong, and it may not be able to spend time to go in that direction, and I strongly resist in my heart, no matter how I twist the direction, I can't change it, sad myself.

This kind of reality, make yourself very frustrated, also very painful, forget one day, and be triggered on another day, basically inevitable, there is a solution, but can not be implemented, the consequences of implementation may be more severe than the current pain, of course, it is a short-term pain, maybe the future will develop into a long pain, just like that, that is still struggling, maybe in the future may be solved by their own way of thinking, and they are just waiting for a hopeful opportunity that may be realized to solve this problem.

We are constantly making habits of behaviors that need to be done in reality, and these habits seem like mechanical actions to outsiders, and basically do not change. Thinking in the place of our own interest is the so-called focus of our attention, so that the trajectory of thinking is separated from our actual actions, resulting in us being inflexible in the eyes of others.

If the thinking is unified with the actual action, then the person is very monotonous and boring in his own opinion, and the main reason may be that the reality determines that he cannot carry out rich practical actions. You may be forced to find a way to expand your realistic life. In reality, it is true that most people do not have access to rich life experiences.

In such a state of reality, the mind and reality are separated, although the mind actually exists in the body of reality, which is the source of imagination, and the mind and reality are separated, so that the sensory experience will be enriched, and it will be almost the same as the actual sensory experience, and the imagination cannot transcend the basic elements of reality sensory experience.

Detachment, that is, innovation, new discoveries. From the perspective of human evolution, the separation of thought and practical action is the reason for the formation of intelligent organisms.

The creation process of this idea to the text narrative can be narrated like us, and it can also become a kind of literary artistic expression, as long as the meaning is correct, as long as the person who sees it understands our true meaning, then it is considered successful, if it cannot be understood, or the understanding is biased, it is not successful, when the idea is transformed into written expression, it is not successful enough, the written expression ability is poor, and it cannot be transferred out of the literary and artistic literary and artistic language expression, that is said to be no literary and artistic cell, did not learn this ability.

Are we really so bad that we can't accurately express the meaning of our feelings? Or do we really lack literary and artistic cells, and can't turn out the literal and verbal expressions of literature and art, if not, then where are we missing? When we see what we write, we don't want to read it, what kind of feeling is this?

We went to see it ourselves, well, we also think it's too long-winded, if this book distills useful ideas, it's actually very simple, and the number of words is not so much, a very thin book can describe it clearly, why do we write so much?

It's not clear, because what we refine is what the latecomers do, it's very simple, and when we open up the future, we really can't know what we will think and see in the next article, it's hard to foresee, this is our experience and cognition that we have written down for many years, and we don't know what nonsense will be written tomorrow.

For people who read books, it really doesn't matter what they do, look at such a thinking process, waste time, may have something to gain, whether the time is worth it, it is better to tell them a conclusion, this is what they prefer, it is really like this, research is useful, otherwise it is not interesting to express it in this way, it is better to write a novel, look comfortable, write some feelings into the novel, read it is also very interesting, do not feel that it is a waste of time, and experience a strange feeling.

It's not academic, it's not research, it's really a narrative, it's a novel, it's an interesting novel, it's a process of experiencing a strange feeling, experiencing a strange feeling of yourself, when you read this book, you have such a feeling, that's right.

But if we read it as an academic work, as a study, then we also have this feeling, this is an academic work, it is a book that can study a lot of content, read it from our own perspective, this is a book of our sensory cognition, starting from a certain time, and then always narrating the sensory cognition, in reality we refine the cognition we want to build a new us.

We are still not confident enough in ourselves, not recognized by the outside world, always doubting that there is something wrong with our ability, we should be used to inferiority, and there is nothing left, just don't hit our confidence to continue walking, that is already a habit, it is already a belief, and the occasional madness also gives us motivation. The future, we are still coming, the future, are you afraid of our arrival?

Feeling also returns to a normal state, will not suddenly appear to yourself in a strange state, very naturally, when it appears, you can't notice it a lot of times, if this is a normal state, it's really not good, there is no feeling no thought, no thought is no cognition, this is normal for yourself, not necessarily good, but also good, become normal, it is always good.

Without these feelings, how would one think? Without these feelings, thinking still exists, or continues, and cognition will still appear, it may have become a habit, the feeling appears, and naturally enters the state of thinking, so fast that you can't feel the appearance of feelings, only feel the progress of thinking, the appearance of cognition, so it is better, natural integration, when the thoughts are separated, the rupture makes the body fall into a state of madness, and now bridging itself is a spontaneous healing act of the body.

After the imagination is formed, that is, the thought, the sensory experience has been separated from the body, that is, it means that it has been separated from reality, and the thought runs on its own track, of course, separation is separation, and the direction of imagination has also led to the differentiation of imagination growth.

Experience other real sensations with imagination, which is part of the fantasy of the people, and the feeling of using the imagination to experience the imaginary world, which is also a part of the people who are completely detached from reality, and use the imagination to experience new sensations, which is part of the innovative people.

And the accumulation of imagination to experience the feeling leads to the individual action, which is also the final result, and the person who is not lost in the imagination executes his imagination, which will achieve a lot of results, a lot of innovations, and a lot of disasters and injuries.

Presumably, the best result of imagination, and perhaps the milder result is to become books, according to which the unimaginative person distills the things that are useful to reality, but he may not be able to prevent harm and disaster from happening, but the person who writes the book may not be the direct leader, but this is the difference.

I can only do my own efforts, whether it is writing a book or reality, and doing my own efforts. Experience your own feelings.

Just carried out a theoretical reasoning, the relative distance = K (K is proved to be a constant) * relative velocity, the way is that the relative velocity of the relative center point of two different points of the concentric circle is V1, V2, and the circular motion can be obtained that in the same time, V1T/V2T = 2πR1/2πR2, the angle of rotation is the same, it is not represented in the formula, and the same term is eliminated to merge R1 = V1/V2*R2.

According to the law of relative velocity and relative distance invariance, R1 = K1V1 and R2 = K2V2, because it is not clear whether K1 is equal to K2. Substituting R1=V1/V2*R2 yields K1=K2. This proves that in the same system of circular motion, K is a constant. K will be different in different reference frames, pending actual measurements.

K difference should also be theoretically deduced, because it is a relative point, if the rotation speed of that relative center point is the same, then K is the same. Both of these substances are rotating, and the relative velocity of the surface of the rotating system relative to the center of the circle of the material is V1 and V2, so they have the two constants of K1 and K2, and the distance from the surface to the center is S1 and S2, so there is S1=K1V1, S2=K2V2. Setting that a substance 2 revolves around another substance 1, the relative distance is S3, and their relative velocity is V3, S3=K3V3, our purpose is to see if K1, K2, and K3 have a necessary relationship.

This is a bit complicated, and there are a lot of uncertainties, that is to say, it is very likely that matter 2 has its own revolution center, and its rotation center and matter 1's rotation center do not overlap, and they all rotate around their own relative distance points, so that a K1, K2, and K3 relationship system cannot be constructed. In other words, K1, K2, and K3 are all independent, and there is no connection.

If matter 1 also revolves around the center point of matter 2, it may be possible to construct a K1, K2, and K3 relationship system. It's a waste of time, the text may not be able to express it accurately, there should be something very interesting going to happen, so let's talk about it when I have time.

The superposition of the rotation of the straight line also occurs in the case of the relative velocity and relative distance of the moving object. Originally, a rotating substance has a constant relative distance from a point in space, and when the matter is superimposed on a linear motion, another relative velocity is obtained, and under the condition that the relative velocity is unchanged and the relative distance is constant, the matter is moving relative to this point.