The charm of stillness
Things that are relatively static to time are very peculiar, and civilization is a kind of thing that is relatively static in time, and our memories, real history, are all peculiar relative to time, at least in the case that we can still explore, they are relatively static.
All kinds of storage devices are relatively stationary, which is a very peculiar thing.
Because of the existence of relative rest, so our fate is not predestined, relative stillness interferes with the current state of motion, at least in front of intelligent beings, for physics, whether there are also relatively stationary objects, interfering with the current state of motion, whether it is the micro level, or the macro level is worth exploring.
Let's look at the charm of stillness from a sociological point of view.
For a person who travels everywhere, the inhabitants of the city are relatively static, and the traveler comes to these cities, which is a collision of movement and stillness. For those who have lived in the city for a long time, it feels like there is no charm here, which is an interesting saying, an analogy.
Analogy is a very peculiar technique, artistic conception, or contact to see the problem, it is difficult to say what it is, the split personality is also a technique of analogy, through analogy we can also get more sparks of inspiration. While it has always been said that this kind of illogical approach is boring, in fact it may be boring.
If we talk about the fascinating development of stillness, there are many things that can be said, and perhaps the development is also a technique of analogy, or that this is how the story is born, and it is a wonderful thing that two seemingly unrelated logical things are connected by analogy.
A scientist who knows literature, whether it is physics, chemistry, biology, mathematics or any other classification, the world is very wonderful, in their hands, boredom will never exist again, a number that seems very rational and has no sense of joy, or a formula will become a beautiful story, a legend.
This is also the charm of passive influence of static things, and it can be regarded as the charm of static things.
For our memory, relative to time is static, all the current information will impact this memory, some memories are washed apart, memory is also a cognition, these short-term cognitions will be broken by the movement, this collision depends on whether the movement is strong enough, sometimes the strength is not enough, there will be nothing.
Then our experience and understanding are different, he is very strong, unless an external force damages him, this is amnesia, and then the stillness is destroyed.
Will there be hypnotists who are powerful enough to change our memories and make us think that what he is talking about is our memory, I don't know if there is such a thing, maybe there will be memory modifiers in the future.
It's quite possible that space will be a kind of stillness, at least not if that's the case at the moment.
It would be strange to think that space is only what we define, only to illustrate the range of motion of particles, and that time is also defined by us to illustrate the manifestation of the beginning to the end of the motion of particles.
So can we abandon space and time, the particles are what we see, the sense of existence, the movement of the particles is also what we see, the sense of existence, but this movement is relative, this is a very peculiar thing, like a group of particles moving together in a certain direction, the particles think they are stationary.
That is to say, there is a stationary object, and everything that has velocity relative to it is in motion, that is, we can study other moving objects only if we assume a stationary object.
So how is stillness defined, what is eternal in time is called stationary, is it possible for this eternal stillness to exist?
In the following discussion, we must understand that we use space-time to define a particle's state of motion, and time, distance, and direction are the spatio-temporal definitions of particles.
This is theoretical, whether we have enough ability to measure the spatiotemporal continuity of particles, this is a very peculiar way to measure, whether we do not have the ability to measure, or whether the particles are originally in motion discontinuous, this is a very interesting research topic.
This is what we are going to talk about the existence of eternal stationary particles, if there are eternal stationary particles, then can we say that the space-time definition of the particle can be continuous, not quantized, because the zero point of time, the zero point of distance, the zero point of direction all exist.
Of course, we have to find the smallest particle, so that we can discuss the feasibility of particles, and if there is a condensation temperature in this universe, then the existence of the smallest energy particle in this condensation temperature is also a very interesting research topic.
If the energy is continuous, then what kind of energy distribution state can be detected by us, and what kind of energy level exists with the smallest energy particle we can detect, which is a very interesting thing.
One theory is that energy is continuous, but our detection ability is too limited to detect continuity, and only the quantized state of the smallest particle.
If we say that energy is continuous, then there is an eternal static energy state, which is also what I call the energy condensation temperature, and this assumption makes me wonder why this energy state can exist, I think there is always a starting point for everything, it is not surprising, even if there is a cycle.
What if, if we think of a black hole as a continuous point of energy, that is, in a black hole, it is possible that energy is continuously distributed, and the black hole becomes a condensation temperature space of energy?
This is a very strange thing, a particle is accelerated to the maximum in a black hole, and finally becomes stationary, and the extreme motion is stationary, this feeling is very paradoxical, but it is fascinating, so that it can be cycled, so how does stillness turn into motion? Does stillness mean nothing, into a continuous whole block of energy.
If the energy velocity decreases to a certain extent, it will become a discontinuous energy particle state, and the black hole will become a strange celestial body with the smallest energy particles emitting from the outermost part of the continuous energy body
Because of the existence of special celestial bodies such as black holes, the universe is full of vitality, not a dead thing, black holes can decompose any celestial body, turn it into a continuous whole block of energy, and then diverge the smallest energy particles into the universe to participate in the creation.
And so there is a strange cycle, and then there is one thing that is still not clear, where is the starting point? Is this the truth that exists forever? Just as we can't discuss the singularity of the so-called Big Bang singularity theory.
At this point in the discussion, I think I should stop exploring, I will dig into the horns, maybe I can continue the discussion of this topic next time, and maybe I will find the answer at that time.
The charm of stillness is not limited to this kind of thinking, and we look at the charm of stillness from another point of view.
The contrast between the state of the universe at this moment and the state at the next moment, we know that motion creates time, and that the movement of the universe at one moment and the universe at the next moment is discontinuous, and that time is discontinuous, which seems incredible.
According to normal people's thinking, the universe always has to be continuous, and time also requires continuous, and the reason for discontinuity is that we cannot carry out limit measurements, that is, it is very likely that we will not be able to do such a measurement at all, or never.
This is a cause that we cannot determine, and we cannot judge from this that the universe is discontinuous, and the motion is discontinuous.
Perhaps, in fact, objectively, the universe itself is a continuous energy state, but the smallest energy states that can be measured for us are discontinuous, and if we can measure these minimum energy states, we may find that it is surrounded by a continuously changing energy circle, until the deepest condensation temperature of the universe, maybe it is the black hole.
This strange energy tide is just like the sea, and it is a romantic surf under the blowing of the cosmic wind.
And the formation of the cosmic energy tide, I think it may be the interactive behavior of transferring energy between black holes, maybe this cosmic wind is the masterpiece of black holes.
The charm of stillness may be more macroscopic, because it is a very beautiful world that we can touch.
The charm of stillness allows us to deny the legend of destiny, which makes me feel very good, I have never been so good, I may have lied to myself every time before, saying that the fate of people can be predestined by heaven, it cannot be changed, if there is no stillness, or there is no memory dimension of time, it is really a predestined fate, and the previous cosmic state determines the next cosmic state.
Stunned, that is to say, the next cosmic state is discontinuous from the previous cosmic state, because the existence of such a thing as stillness, the existence of memory, the existence of memory, the existence of civilization, will interfere with this continuous state of the universe.
It seems that there is also such a thing, the discontinuity of the state of the universe is disturbed by stillness, and perhaps the stillness does not interfere with the continuity of the cosmic state in the microscopic sense, because even if we move the universe under the impetus of stillness, it is actually a continuous action in the microscopic sense.
Stillness only interferes with our predestined destiny, and cannot interfere with the continuity of the universe in the microcosm, because stillness only exists in the macroscopic dimension of memory. This civilization, this dimension of memory, is very wonderful.
Such an explanation is not satisfactory, so that we are no longer trapped by fate, and do not destroy the continuity of the state of the universe, at least it has a bit of an objective taste.
Now thinking about whether these are meaningful, such questions are just as boring as thinking about whether life is meaningful, thinking about whether it is meaningful, who told us to think? Well, if you're determined to know the answer, I think there's going to be an answer, and at some point in the future, when people are done exploring everything, they're going to say, it's meaningful to think about this.