What is the irreplaceable existence that you need? To this extent, what you need is the irreplaceable existence, and what you are looking for is this problem, or the process is still not enough, what is what you need, what is your irreplaceable existence.

When you enter the whirlpool that you can't get out of, who asked the question, what is the purpose, what is the purpose of what you want to do, what state do you want to put yourself in, is this the function of this thing, what is the use of this question, what other use is there in answering this question? If so, why bother with this question, the language trap, or the interrogation trap, the question designed to grasp the human psyche?

However, this question is really very attractive to people into the whirlpool, Winter has recently slowly broken away from the peace program, learned to think for himself, in this real world, the perception of the peace program has many mistakes, or not mistakes, it is a huge conflict with reality, a huge conflict between another time and space and real time and space.

And the peace program is the representative of correctness, he can't understand why this real-world false perception can still exist, and Winter knows why, so Winter needs to think more about himself to solve these problems, so that he can develop and achieve what he wants.

For various historical reasons, the words of the country where Winter is located are full of the feeling of leaders, but there are not many people who do in-depth details, and if they go deeper, what prevents them from continuing to go deeper, persistently studying, afraid of getting tired, lazy, or not going to go deep at all, this kind of can't find a reason at all, it's just a phenomenon, they have to find a reason for themselves, and after finding it, it's just a leader-style excuse, and then, there is no then.

Based on this cognition, Winter should be different, which is also inevitable, after all, he is not even a person in this time and space, and every time he thinks about it, he sighs, probably because Winter cares about this thing very much, and it is the reason why he can't fit in, emphasizing that it is always for isolation.

What kind of emotion is enmity, it is obvious that people in some countries in this world use this to define the relationship network with their own related people, rather than to define it by supply and demand, and based on these two theories, two different civilizations will be achieved, and the civilization defined by faith, love, the law of the jungle, and reason also presents a very special phenomenon.

The world defined by rules, Winter thinks so, and for the mastery of rules, you will know a lot of things that will happen, what will happen, and the most difficult to predict is the changes caused by the collision of rules, in fact, observe the phenomenon more, under the statistics, it is basically clear, and these rules are who is making, who is leading, or just the phenomenon of performance is caught by some people, and constantly spread and strengthen in this society, so that paranoia appears, it is a terrible thing.

I can't help but ask, what do people really need? Maybe it's what do they need to feel? There is one thing, Winter has experienced, and I can't forget, I can't say what it feels like, Winter hopes that he doesn't want to be that kind of person, but recently Winter feels that he is more and more like that kind of person, and it is also clear, and you will know the meaning in the future, if you have not experienced it, it is useless to say it, maybe that person is based on such an idea, and perfunctory Winter with such a sentence.

"You once said that she is the person you love the most, the person you care about the most. "On an execution ground, Winter was with another man, and Winter was still young at the time.

"Yes, she is still the person I love and care about the most. Winter didn't know why the reply was so cold.

"Then why don't you stop it. Winter looked at him suspiciously.

"I care, but there is a rationality that I don't know that restricts all my actions, and you will know it later. That's how the other person replied.

Winter later slowly became clear, he cares about a person, he cares about a person very much, but after the other party is injured, he doesn't have any feelings in his heart, if he pretends to be comforted, that's not what Winter wants, Winter really doesn't have feelings, it's really gone, why, because Winter was bound by reason and didn't act from the first time he cared, and the habit was formed, and this emotion-driven behavior was completely lost.

Why, why, even if Winter desperately shouts loudly in his heart, it will not help, this is people, it is right or wrong to do things according to their own feelings, no one can tell, the scene is different, the object is different, there are good and bad, after really being able to distinguish between right and wrong, will he act? Even if it is death.

That passion is consumed by age, obliterated by Winter himself, and he can no longer pay the price, he can't be a poet, he can't be a young man, he can't be a steady person, if stability is a positive word, then when facing the right time, he can really die, and if stability is a derogatory word, then there is nothing to say.

Rationality is also a kind of feeling, people still follow their own feelings to do things, it has always been, and whether survival is the first thing has become, the distinguishing point between impulse and reason, where does evil come from? Whether people themselves are too unclear, and the lack of cognition makes society and personal feelings so confused.

Maybe not, two people are in different angles, right and wrong, thinking in different directions, right and wrong, thinking about completely different content, right and wrong, is there a possibility of negotiation?

Is it because of the lack of one's own ability? I can't distinguish clearly, so I can't know, I need to be told how to do it, and when I encounter such a situation, I just use a sentence that this is a human characteristic and cannot be changed, and if I know that I am wrong, how to change it, and whether it is right to change it, is it possible to change it? It depends on your purpose, if it's just for another purpose of comfort and help, it's hypocrisy, if it's just because you care, reason makes the feeling lost, just comfort for the sake of comfort, help for help, that's not hypocrisy, it's just because your feelings are lost by you in a certain situation, and you are under the constraints of reason.

Everything that is seen and perceived is a meaningful existence, and anything that is said or transmitted is a meaningful existence, because of existence, what does Winter want to do? Has he thought about it, time can't be repeated, Winter only has one chance, and he can't change it if he chooses, especially a large-scale plan.

In fact, if Winter sees himself as an investor, it becomes a number of opportunities, it may be a lot of opportunities waiting for him, as long as Winter has money, he can invest in doing whatever he wants, if he focuses on doing one thing by himself, although he will really succeed, but it is only a choice of one path.

Winter probably wouldn't have made a choice of one path, but if Winter didn't use those resources, how could he achieve this kind of walking together on multiple paths? Is there any special meaning in using the easiest way, fantasy, or a more realistic way, like asking Que Kuo to write a book and invisibly letting others do the opportunities he wants?

Maybe Winter didn't think of this at all, because it didn't mean anything to Winter at all, and he didn't even think about it, which means that Winter didn't know about it at all, and no matter how much others discussed it, Winter didn't care about anything.

Doing things for the sake of feeling, I'm afraid Winter is not so chic, he won't do things for the feeling, and the same Winter will definitely not do things for survival, do things for survival, is it also for the feeling to do things, if it is not for the feeling to do things, then why do things, if people don't have feelings, can they still be called people?

There must be a feeling at work, people are like this, and if they don't have feelings, then they will end their lives, and this proves that a single logical intelligent creature exists, and that existence has only a single feeling, in fact, it cannot be said that this is a feeling, it is just a kind of operating logic.

And based on that, what does it feel like, a combination of a lot of single operating logics? And the operating logic that collides with each other. Then here it is back, in this case, why do people do things, it is the result of many kinds of running logic conflicts to do things, this is a kind of human feeling.

That feeling must be very disordered, unless a single operation of a certain logic, there will be ordered logic, that is to say, any feeling can actually be a single operation, it cannot be said that some feelings can be a single operation logic, and some feelings generated by conflict can not be a single operation logic, can only be generated by conflict, and not necessarily combined to produce directional logic.

This may be because there are many other reasons for the participation of information from the outside world, or from within, and these feelings are aggregate real-time sensations, and there is no eternity, only real-time, like a kind of inspiration, is this really the case? Even if this is really the case, what does it matter, the phenomenon of human beings already exists, how do people use themselves, this is a topic of research.

The implicit single operation logic, and the explicit single operation logic, the general explicit single operation logic does not play a leading role, just like the existence of thinking operation logic, just constantly analyzing information, just analyzing information, most of the leading role is implicit single operation logic, and that conflict feeling only occurs when it is triggered, and may have an effect.

And the explicit single operating logic, just like if thinking plays a leading role, it will show the behavior of a thinker, and it is perceived by the thinker itself, which is different from the implicit single operating logic, implicit is not perceived by oneself, or occasionally perceived, the thinker knows very clearly that he has been in a state of thinking, otherwise he will not be able to capture those peculiar cognitions.

This doesn't seem to be the essence, it's just a phenomenon of personal simulation structure construction, and many of these personal simulation structures exist, but they keep analogy, and they seem to be true, but they are actually the product of personal feelings, and if you believe that this is true, you get caught up in it, and you run yourself according to this construction, it's really a strange thing, maybe this is also a phenomenon that exists, and some of them can't be distinguished even by peaceful programs.