Regardless of why the strange sunspots exist, this is also particularly confusing, the sunspots will aggregate together under the condition that the relative distance is unchanged and the relative velocity is unchanged, and when the sunspots have no speed, this aggregation cannot become a sunspot because of the size of the sunspots, so as to squeeze each other, and the middle can have no speed, and there is a rotational tendency around it, forming an amorphous rotation, forming a rotating substance, which may be the reason for the rotation of the substance.

As mentioned last time, electromagnetic waves may be an orderly representation of squeezed sunspots. If this is the case, how do you get a single sunspot? A constant magnetic field rotates and cuts the space, just like taking a magnet and rotating the magnet quickly at one end of the magnet, so that a sunspot space vortex is formed in the center of rotation, and the sunspot enters and then goes out from here.

In this way, if the speed of this magnet is increased, look at the exit or entrance position of this center, and see if the magnetic field strength has changed, so that it can be proved that there are indeed sunspots in the space, and this void is full of these sunspots.

This is the sunspot generator, which is also based on this principle, and is made into a sunspot magnifying glass, sunspot suspension power, sunspot drive, and sunspot weapon. Just use a magnet material, or energize the coil, and then turn it quickly, which all need to provide energy, provide electrical energy.

In space, if the magnet rotates rapidly, will it always rotate like this, constantly providing sunspot jets, and then spraying on the sunspot wall to push the spacecraft forward, the sunspot wall is actually a barrier formed by a magnetic field, because at present only this can block the sunspot penetration.

If this proves that sunspots do exist, and the sunspot jet can be formed, it can solve the suspension problem, instead of a magnetic generation module like now that it must be installed on the ground in order to counteract the repulsive force, and it cannot be installed together with the entire levitator, if it is installed together, because the forces cancel each other, it cannot be suspended, and now there is this kind of sunspot jet, which is installed together, and it can also be suspended, but the power of the sunspot should be relatively small, and if you want to obtain a huge sunspot jet power, you need more experiments to get specific parameters。

The difference between theory and reality lies in time and detail, and doing a lot of experiments, and then constantly adjusting and trying to come up with an accurate design, is a very time-consuming process, not as simple as thought.

If you don't want to do more experiments, you must spend a lot of energy and time to deduce all the details, calculate the theoretical data first, and then arrange experiments, so that the comparison data, if it matches, and comprehensively test it several times before you can really confirm whether this theory is correct or a mistake.

It's just that don't underestimate the conjecture, without the conjecture there is no latter behavior, then you don't know anything, this is a complete process of theory coming out, everything looks not simple, it may be relatively easy to confirm, and conjecture to get a theory, it may take centuries, maybe you can't think of it, history has proven.

Ion thrusters have not yet been maturely applied, power is a problem, cost is also a problem, even if the sunspot is proven to exist, even if it is manufactured, to the mature stage, to become a system, it will take a certain amount of time, sometimes a material may need to wait a century.

On the basis of this guessing element, a fantasy world can be constructed, because it has not been confirmed, if it is confirmed to be true, then it may be a future science fiction world, if it is confirmed to be false, then it is a fantasy world, which has always been like this, unless you build a world on top of what you know is false, it is a fictional world, of course, some of the feelings in it may be the real feelings of the people who wrote at that time.

This kind of experiment has high requirements for some details, constant magnetic field, do not produce jitter displacement when rotating, the accuracy of magnetic field measurement equipment, if there is anything? That is, how strong the magnetic field, how much difference in rotation speed, can be detected, the collation and analysis of this experimental data, maybe a formula will be drawn to deduce the interaction of relevant parameters, so that it is possible to evaluate the application on this basis, the evaluation of practicability.

This idea was generated, after some basic exclusion analysis, and finally the narrative has been roughly thought about and matured here, at least now, at the time of the narration, I did not see that this experiment, this theoretical conjecture has anything that cannot be executed, with previous experience, these problems will be seen in the process of concrete implementation of the experiment can be completed, and if the basic construction can be completed, what kind of conditions are missing that cause the experiment to be unable to continue, and then find a way to solve it, to build again, these processes are relatively normal, after the whole thing is done in the future, others will say, why didn't you think clearly before, look at how much time it has taken now, how much energy, how many detours to do this thing well.

At this time, we should not even be bother to refute. If we know clearly, we don't need to build, this is not a design, just a copy process, and there must be a prerequisite, there is this thing for us to copy, even if it is copied, it also needs to be analyzed, if the analysis is wrong, there will still be errors, and then analyze, and then adjust, it is also such a process.

As for why you are so poor, you analyze the mistakes? Maybe we are really poor, if we are good, then everything can be successful at one time, a complaint, an engineer complains behind his back, sometimes as an engineer at the same time, you can't help other engineers refute, because you can't find a reason, take care of your own affairs, this is a scolding us for not being sensible, the world is really helpless.

But it is true that according to our understanding, the inclusive attitude is really not as good as these people, we understand, we understand, so that we can not blame, can not manage, soft attitude, and such an attitude is really not good to manage people, I don't know why people are like this, after all, these managed people are not highly cognitive, I am afraid that we can not learn to understand and tolerate people can manage well.

Reasonable management, sometimes can not produce results at all, this kind of unreasonable, strong, unreasonable management but let people restrain themselves, do their own things. This is really strange, it may indeed be caused by low understanding, people who can improve their own understanding and restrain themselves are indeed very rare, then based on such a basis, those people will manage better, because they are more unreasonable than others, they understand the oppression of power, they also do not know much, they only recognize the usefulness of power, people with low power listen to the words of high power, it is very simple, so you don't need to pretend to complete this kind of management.

When everything is going well, this is the reality and can be managed better. When I think about one thing, I was instilled with geometric theorems and something like that when I was a child, is it true that this kind of conclusion based on measurements, based on how many sets of data is it true? What is the measurement dimensional accuracy, what is the measurement angle accuracy, how many sets of measured data are there, is there any? Is it possible to query? Who did the test?

A lot of all of this, where is the experimental data, is it queryable, and if not, why do you instill in us that it's correct? Or are the people who educate us mistaken, these things are basically uncertain things.