When Winter began to plan his future, he made a lot of paths, thinking about how to develop in the future from now, so as to make a lot of plans, Winter could not see the specific situation of his future, he could see the current situation, and save every penny of his money, which can be done, and it is also a kind of planning for the future.

Accumulating one's own knowledge, learning various skills, or learning a certain skill in depth, this is also something that can be invested, and in Winter's view, when the future situation is not clear, these are all preparatory means, not a waste of time, just planning for the future.

Accumulate some interpersonal relationships, this is also what Winter wants to do, this is all reality, these are investments in the future, Winter does not know whether he has a lot of wealth in the future, or is in heavy distress, these investments must be made now, not that the future is unforeseeable, maybe he is unlucky, and he dies the next moment, then what he is doing at present is not useless, it is not a waste of his time, it is not that there is wine in the present and drunk today, and he is entertained and waiting for death, this attitude itself is wrong, and it is a kind of decadent spirit that plays a role in people。

Positive attitude does make people more tired, Winter deeply understands, this is probably also a lot of people give up a positive attitude to life, and turn to a happy decadent attitude to life, the comparison of the two, is indeed the case, this is really strange, why is this happening, why does a positive attitude make people feel tired, and why a decadent attitude makes people feel happy.

According to the natural nature, according to the theory of natural evolution, all people should live a decadent life, so that people are happy, and they are more in line with fate, which is normal, but after feeling happy, wake up and find that they can't live anymore, without the kind of capital that enjoys happiness and has, they will inevitably be tired, what should they do at this time?

Then it is natural to work hard to obtain the capital of enjoyment, but if you don't have the ability to obtain, then what should you do? cheating, violence, and so on, following the laws of natural animal nature, grabbing food is a process of exhaustion, and enjoying food is a process of happiness, which has become a decadent attitude to life in human society.

Is this the progress of civilization? Under the cover of reality, some essential laws are still in effect, but human beings cannot recognize them, and they have become confused, and many people are still following this kind of law, but they have changed their means and changed the words of civilization to cover up the essential laws.

What happens if you don't follow these ancient laws? Is it not suitable for this body, causes damage to the body, is always in a state of fatigue, and has a positive attitude towards life? So in the end, what kind of combination of work and rest is mentioned, and many people still find the problem, but they don't know what is at work in these realities.

Whether this way of dealing with problems is correct or not, it should be right, for the functions of the body, the consequence of just doing so is the stagnation of evolution, the stagnation of the evolution of the body, and the power of evolution is very strong.

This kind of active behavior of welcoming evolution and allowing the body to evolve independently is positive, and it is also in line with another essential law, and it is a relatively positive law, which is a natural development process, but this essential law is always carried out in a passive situation, and it seems more alternative to actively cater to this positive law.

This kind of narration seems to be all about going with the flow, following the essence of the phenomenon in application, but just a sentence that you can't see what nature is, it is true, who can see the natural phenomenon, who can see the hidden phenomenon, or the essential law behind nature?

Most people can't see it, they just feel that it's right to go with the flow, it's just right, but they can't know what is really going with the flow, the limitations of cognition will make a lot of things incorrect, unable to recognize the essential rules, these superficial cognitive states, and the way to solve problems summarized are also rough, and with the development of time, they will always be eliminated, and will be replaced by more refined cognition and more refined ways of solving problems, just like being replaced by the so-called modern science.

But human beings have changed their lips to another word, science, but what is science really? They don't know either, they grab a word and think they know it, which is too interesting, this is superficial cognition, or superficial cognition.

True cognition is to get a glimpse of the true essence of reality, and then apply and create, and this is not something that can be replaced by a single word, and can never be solved with this word, everyone will teach others a lesson, you have to use scientific means to solve the problem? The people who listen are confused, what scientific means? Just be specific, tell me how to solve this problem, what scientific means to solve this problem, this is simply political language, it is simply a joke.

There are too many such words, too many such words exist in society, and all people think that they have mastered the truth, you see, science is the truth, and when I speak with the word science, it is the truth, and if you are not convinced, do you dare to refute me? How can you refute me, is what I said unreasonable? I said that you have a problem with your thinking, do you dare to refute it? Indeed, it is really impossible to refute, it is indeed impossible to refute, how can you refute that your words are wrong? Your words are right, after all, you are the leader, I can't say that you should do it yourself, and it is impossible to say how to solve the current problem in specific details. I'm the one who does the details, it's supposed to be my job, and I can't argue with it.

Winter's application made the people in the mall feel strange, because Winter is a man, but a lot of work in the mall needs men to do, and many men are unwilling to work here, not because of gender discrimination here, sometimes this is an emotion in people's hearts, this kind of true emotion does not know what the source is, and they may want to be kings, and they belong to the animal attributes of men in a community.

Wages are like this, you like to do it or not, there are many people who do these things, just such a situation, no one can do anything in such an orderly world, obey or obey, want to survive, don't want to sin, you have to live a normal life, in this process of human society, no one can resist this process, and this process is cruel in the early stage of formulation, everyone who knows this situation knows, but there is no better way to solve it, the world is moving forward, can not stagnate.

Winter accepted this obedience, because he knew that this was the rule, and some resistance could not solve this kind of problem, and before finding a way to solve the problem, make positive preparations, do not ask why, and do not ask if it is useful, this is human life, and it is the survival attitude that human beings have chosen as creatures.

There are no more cognitive breakthroughs, sometimes in the same conflict situation, the cognition is the same, there is no progress, or a newer cognition appears, which means that in such a conflict situation, the best rational choice has been like this, it has been identified, it cannot be changed, it cannot be found better, the other choices are not smart, irrational, not the best, but what about the outcome? What will be the outcome of the best choice?

That may not be the best, for everyone is different, the outcome will not be the same, and if this is the case, why should we say that this is the best rational choice? It is also strange that with such a statement, there is no universal best option. Then there is nothing to talk about.

The ending may be really different, but this does not hinder cognition, just make a cognition, but make different choices, will there be such a situation? And will this affect the ending? It will affect the outcome of people's cognition, this may really happen, it is not clear, in reality, it is just a single choice, it cannot be compared, and it is impossible to really compare, unless it is really two parallel worlds that appear at some point of intersection, and the intersection of choice is only the intersection of his choice.

Unless, the singular choice happens, the world develops in one direction, Winter is admitted, he is told some of the rules of the mall, the area of responsibility, and just like that, nothing happens, maybe, or maybe another person who might be recruited by the mall, loses such a job because of Winter.

Winter didn't think about the future of time, after having a family, having children, and a lot of interpersonal relationships, whether time still belongs to Winter personally, or just to someone else, Winter is just as a participating element, eternally following the participation, composing these pictures, time is like this, this is the future foresight that Winter may inevitably experience.

This thing, at present, Winter can't think about it, and won't think about it, if it happens, what else can be done, is it to make these things not happen, and do some resistance, like not starting a family, like not having children, like more like.

Happening, you have to face it, face it to solve the problem, adjust the time, to solve these problems, the mentality must also be adjusted, the work content, everything will happen at this time a relatively big change, living habits, all, all, this is a rule, the rebels also have, but this is a rule, there is no why, this is a rule, unless you can find a better way to break this rule, this is the rough rules created by nature, just like some of the rough rules created by human beings themselves, nature is not perfect, do not understand the perfect creation, or there is no perfect creation at allPerhaps it may be a limitation of human understanding, but nature is indeed creating all kinds of rules perfectly, and human beings can only watch, only obey, only apply, and cannot change.