It was supposed to be a column, but after thinking about it, I felt that the starting point column would not give me a review.

Then just send a single chapter.

Readers who are not interested in anything other than the work can skip it.

On April 27, China Literature changed its senior management and changed its management team.

Taking this as an opportunity, the two issues of "selling contract" and "free genuine" were finally put on the table.

To be honest, these two things have nothing to do with the new high-level management, they are both historical problems, but they broke out at this time.

When the authors' little affection and trust in the starting point disappeared with the departure of the old team, under the Tacita effect, the long-term accumulated dissatisfaction and panic of an uncertain future caused things to get out of hand.

However, this does not mean that the new management is trustworthy.

I'm on the fence about their future strategy.

So back to the original question...... Forget it, I'm too lazy to engage in the spectator's perspective, just beep.

The contract at the starting point has been so dark since a long time ago, and this "new contract" just uses words such as "commissioned creation" and "hiring" to tear off the last fig leaf.

This means that the author has gone backwards step by step in the past few years, and today there is no way back.

We used to be "authors", now many times we only dare to call ourselves "writers", and then what?

Gunman?

Then I'd rather be an "independent author".

Look at this word, how cyberpunk it feels!

Is it really "high-tech and inhumane"?

Not to mention free, the same content, the starting point is free for WeChat, so that the paid genuine version and the free piracy will end up together?

Free Genuine Plan Pass?

Oh yes, when I was talking about this in the group, I found that many readers didn't know some of the mechanics of the starting point:

1. The author of the coin subscription cannot receive money, and there is no point, and even the subscription data in the background does not count the coins.

2. The author of the red envelope cannot receive money, the red envelope is sent to other readers, and it is often snatched away by robots.

3. The starting point will really modify the content of the work directly without notifying the author, and the body of the title and introduction of the book is within the scope of modification.

Before we knew it, the starting point had already broken the bottom line countless times by boiling frogs in warm water!

Many of the great gods have already said more declarations, and China Literature seems to have responded, saying that it will hold an author meeting on May 6.

But this is not the end, far from it.

None of our battles can stop until real victory comes.

The amendment to the Copyright Law (draft) is soliciting comments on the Chinese National People's Congress website, if you have time, you can search and participate.

It is not only related to online articles, but also radiates to all cultural and creative fields that have been plagued by copyright.

Look at it rationally, stay hot, don't be naïve, and don't give up speaking out.

Every voice should have power.

Your spread is power.

The whole book