Shen Qi wrote his opinion on the blackboard:

Res（g(s）-2k)=Τ（s）ζ（s）（2α）^-s......

"When k is greater than or equal to 1, s=0 is the first-order pole of g(s), and I transform τ in the integral of this formula to be equal to -2k-s......" Shen Qi stated loudly, knocking on a formula on the blackboard: "Then we get this formula, then the sum number diameter transformation can be turned into the sum number in the twin matching method, based on this setting, the first expression of the ζ(s) I obtained is valid." That is, I am not using any of the theories in the Hardy system, which is a classic system, but the 21st century needs a new, more advanced system, thank you. ”

Shen Qi's generous statement was reasonable and well-founded, and won the approval of most of the experts present.

"There is a contradiction between Euclidean geometry and Lobachevsky geometry, but both systems are used, and there is no absolute right or wrong. Kabrovsky said that on the first issue he supported Shen Qi.

"We have studied Newton's classical mechanics system, and we have also studied quantum mechanics, Newton is not wrong, Einstein and Schrödinger are equally right. Rodriguez added.

"Shen is a great scholar, but no one can compare with Einstein, Schrödinger, and Lobachevsky. Maynard was a little excited.

"Don't get so excited, Professor Maynard, I think what Professors Kabrovsky and Rodriguez said makes sense, Shen's twin matching method is not incompatible with Hardy's system, day and night do not exist at the same time, but they both make sense. Carrick, a neutral Canadian mathematician, gradually leaned towards Shen Qi, believing that Shen Qi's solution to the first problem was very reasonable, there were no loopholes in logic, and Shen Qi's new theory was valid.

"Professor Kabrowski, Professor Rodriguez, Professor Carrick, on the first question, we have been discussing it in Sweden for two months, and I still support Professor Maynard's point of view, that only the Hardy system is the only correct way to solve the Riemann hypothesis. Wilson, an Australian mathematician, stepped forward, and he was clearly on Maynard's side.

"Hardy and Ramanujan failed to prove the Riemann conjecture, what is missing is time, and we have plenty of time, we should follow the right path of Hardy and Ramanujan. The curly-haired Indian mathematician Sabasin, he was really with Maynard, who supported the British master Hardy, and Sabasin did not forget to bring out Hardy's best partner, the pride of the Indians, Ramanujan.

Shen Qi looked at the three mathematicians from the Commonwealth countries coldly, normal, this is normal, even if what I say is reasonable, there will always be people who jump out and accuse me.

At this time, Kenji Nakamura, a mathematician from the University of Tokyo, stood up, walked to the blackboard, picked up chalk and wrote:

ρ1，1-ρ1

ρ2，1-ρ2

ρ3，1-ρ3

......

ρn，1-ρn

......

ζ（s）=e^A+Bs∏∞n=1（1-s/ρn）（1-s/1-ρn）e^（s/ρn+s/1-ρn）

After writing it, Kenji Nakamura said, "I studied Shen's twin matching method in depth, and I used the vertical combination method to deduce the exact same conclusion as Shen's first expression. We should respect the facts, respect the laws of mathematics, Shen's theory is correct, this is undoubtedly the most basic mathematical law. ”

Shen Qi was very surprised, yo, Nakamura, a Japanese ben person, actually supported me, he used the fundamental theorem of algebra to verify my twin matching method and the first expression, quite an idea, wonderful!

There is justice in the world, and mathematicians with real conscience and professionalism are concerned with mathematics itself, and all other factors are not within the scope of evaluation.

Starting from the fundamental theorem of algebra, Kenji Nakamura verified that Shen Qi's new theory was logically valid.

"I still stick to my opinion, and I obey the rules of the jury, and in the final decision, let's vote. "Maynard was very stubborn, like most Britons.

The current situation is that supporters 4: opposition 3: centrist 4.

Shen Qixin said that in your voting session, recognize my proof of the Riemann conjecture, do you need more than 50% of the votes in favor or more than 80%?

It won't be a one-vote veto!

The voting setting must be asked clearly, otherwise Maynard will target me to death, so why not make a yarn.

"6 votes, 11 of us cast more than 6 votes in favor, including 6 votes, then the IMU and Acta Mathematica Sinica will approve your paper. Kabrowski, the head of the jury, explained the voting rules to Shen Qi.

"Fair, isn't it. Shen Qi was relieved and asked, "So we don't have to worry about the Hardy system anymore, right?"

"Moving on to the next question, this question is something I've always been concerned about. This time it was Kablowski's turn to ask, and he asked Shen Qi how to explain that under the setting of the twin matching method, ρ must be a first-order zero?

This question is a good question, professional without losing the standard, and the high-end is very high-grade.

Kabrovsky's questions were objective and fair, and from the perspective of mathematics itself, Shen Qi felt that it was necessary to explain it clearly to the jury.

Shen Qi was energetic and answered, and it was twelve o'clock at noon after answering the second question.

For four hours in the morning, Shen Qi answered a total of two questions.

The reviewers are very professional, and they pay attention to any doubtful details, which can never be done in 45 minutes.

If the "Riemann Conjecture Proof Based on the 'Twin Matching Method'" is to pass the review, it means that more than six experts have no doubts in every detail, that is, Shen Qi must get more than six perfect scores.

An afternoon passed, and two new questions were perfectly answered by Shen Qi.

Fighting at night, working until the early hours of the morning, the jury asked a total of 8 questions today, which tired Shen Qi into a dog.

Fortunately, the result was quite satisfactory, and Shen Qi's intuition told him that the number of supporters had reached about six.

It was dawn, and the review continued, and on the second review day, Shen Qi answered 5 questions.

After three days of interrogation, Shen Qi carried it over, but the old head of the regiment Kabrovsky was tired.

On the fourth day, the head of the regiment Kabrovsky came to work with illness, and he asked the last question of this review: "If the Riemann conjecture is true, then Shen, how do you interpret the logζ(σ+it) <." 0,1/2≤σ≤1. ”

According to Shen Qi's observations, the current situation is that the supporters 6: the opposition 3: the neutrals 2.

Once you've answered the last question, you're done!

This question belongs to a new problem derived from the discussion in the body of the paper, Shen Qi took chalk and wrote on the blackboard, and after writing a set of formulas, he knocked on the blackboard and said in an impassioned tone: "I proved that there is logζ<<σ^-1log∣t∣,∣t∣≥2 in the circle ∣s-s0≤∣3/2-σ, and it is obvious that the < here."

Shen Qi broke out, thunderous!

Maynard was startled and accidentally spilled coffee on his trousers.

Except for Maynard, Wilson, and Sabasin, three Commonwealth mathematicians, who sat on their chairs, the other eight mathematicians all stood up and looked excited.

"Shen, you actually came up with this proof method in such a short period of time!"

"Perfect proof that the Riemann conjecture is a correct proposition!"

"Let's vote, yes, there's nothing to ask, Shen is a genius, let's vote for a genius!"

Knock knock!

Shen Qi tapped on the blackboard: "Please sit down first, I haven't finished yet." ”

The situation was very good, and the eight mathematicians in the jury were completely conquered by Shen Qi.

There are already 8 yes votes!

Shen Qi has almost become a god, and the rest is only a matter of time.

Appreciating, applauding, frustrated, helpless, unconvinced, a variety of emotions in the conference room are mixed together.

Under the attention of everyone, Shen Qi suddenly had the inspiration to write a new formula, and he banged on the blackboard excitedly: "If the Riemann conjecture is true, there is also a situation that when 1/2+(loglog∣t∣)^-1≤σ≤1, there is logζ(s)<<(loglog∣t∣)(log∣t∣)^2-2σ, of which <

Brush!

Indian mathematician Sabasin couldn't help but jump up, his eyes widened, and his curly hair straightened: "Yes, he is right, genius imagination, devilish derivation logic......"

Looking at Sabasin's evil-like appearance, Maynard was angry, the Hindu was too unreliable, and he was rebelled by Shen Qi?

Maynard looked at the blackboard, as a top number theory expert, he had to admit that Shen Qi did have a genius brain and devilish logic......

......