Ma Feng listened to Gu Kun's words, and was silent for a long time.

Gu Kun's attitude was more resolute than he imagined, but it was also more principled and clear, and he could indeed make some innocent colleagues not have to endanger themselves.

At least Gu Kunming said: for companies that rely on scientific and technological strength and follow a business model that can permanently reduce costs, they will not obstruct it. What he has to deal with is only relying on capital subsidies to falsify and pull down the industry's forced spicy chicken.

Who wouldn't burn money, don't accept my brother to burn with you. And my brother can burn money regardless of returns, and after it is burned, he would rather launch the company that he burned to death, leaving no market value, and he is not afraid to do it.

It's not that you can't afford to burn without money.

After sorting out his thoughts, Ma Feng weakly distinguished: "However, Xiao Yang's matter, you may not be able to say that he is purely relying on burning money and is unsustainable, right? I know a little about him, there is definitely no scientific and technological innovation, but business model innovation may not be absent, it is still a little clever."

Low group fee or even zero group fee compulsory shopping group, the early start-up capital really has to be burned, and the follow-up, maybe you can really rely on the commission of shopping to cover all the costs, as well as profits. Then it is possible to continue this model forever, not the kind of situation you said, 'burn to the first market share, squeeze the peers to death, and then go back to raise prices to harvest consumers'. Using the theory you just used to appease other Internet entrepreneurs, I'm afraid it doesn't make perfect sense. ”

Gu Kun: "Of course, I have considered all aspects of dealing with him, and just now it is only the main aspect. On the other hand, the business model of shopping groups is inherently illegal in the relevant system of the Lan side, and he wants to do so on the land of the Lan side, which destroys the atmosphere of our industry, what happened to me?

Let me go a little deeper: I know what you're worried about, are you afraid that the world will treat me as the kind of 'high up and look down on free and cheap, hate free and cheap, just to keep the high-end luxury tyrant set up by force', I am not such a person, I am divided into occasions, needs and industries.

If there is an Internet e-commerce company today, which meets the basic survival needs of the people, then no matter how cheap it is, or because of the low cost, it can make people click more advertisements and share and share links, so they can directly send XX for 1 yuan and YY for 10 yuan, and I will not interfere.

I know how many poor people there are in China, and I have compassion for these people. They are not my target customers in the luxury and tourism industry, I don't want to intervene in their lives, they can live a nourishing life at a low cost, and I will watch them take advantage of those small advantages like every conscientious philanthropist.

In this regard, I have always felt that China's humanistic feelings are much more pragmatic than the hypocritical spicy chicken of Oceania: those Western dogs in Oceania always put the so-called dignity and expression in a very high position, while the Chinese people like to put 'the right to survival and development first' in the first place, and I have always supported Huaxia's pragmatism on this issue.

Therefore, to solve the basic needs of survival and development, you have the ability to make bargains, and even if sometimes they infringe on my intellectual property rights, I will turn a blind eye to admit it.

For example, in the relevant provisions of China's economic management and public security management, it is necessary to crack down on scalpers when buying train tickets during the Spring Festival? If we follow the logic of the absolute free market in the West, we should allow scalpers at this time, and allow people who are 'time is more valuable, but they have money but no time' to fully trade with the scalpers who 'have no time and no money', and the one with the highest price should get the train ticket for the Spring Festival.

But in China, scalpers are going to be hit, I think this is a kind of humanistic care, this is to express that 'the Spring Festival train ticket is so cheap, it is a kind of welfare given by the country to the people, and it should be tilted towards the poor and people in urgent need', so that people who have money and no time can't use money to buy other people's time, you either queue up in person, or you don't want to queue up since the time is so noble, then go to the plane. ”

When Gu Kun said this, he paused slightly, so that Ma Feng could digest some of the humanistic care in it.

Ma Feng really hadn't thought about this question before, and after thinking about it for a while, he still didn't understand: "But, what does this have to do with the low-cost tour group you said? There is no such thing as 'no transaction queuing time', right?"

Ma Feng's understanding of Gu Kun's words just now only understood that "Gu Kun does not support people who are valuable in time to spend money on other people's queuing time and hard work and energy when solving basic survival needs."

Gu Kun shook his head and poured a glass of vodka for both parties: "You are too rigid in form, and it can also be said that you don't know enough about the tourism industry, so you haven't seen through the essence of zero tour fee."

I know that even if I crack down on forced shopping and forced buying and selling without buying a lot of money, we will still be able to maintain a low group fee, and I believe that in a few years, this kind of behavior will be prohibited in the laws of your country.

Why is that? You can go undercover to the shopping sites where there are no tours, or ask people who have experienced this kind of tours. The essence of their induced shopping is actually achieved by 'gradient insult value trading'.

For example, in the same group, there may be people who are generous, add extra money to upgrade the standard of the hotel they live in, and are also bold when buying things. Then the ground tour guide may give these guests extra courtesy, and even pay out of their own pocket to add dishes to these guests who spend money and are happy, invite them to eat local real high-end food, and even secretly deduct a part of the budget from the group meal budget to add meals to the guests...... In fact, these are nothing, and they are within the scope of legal and reasonable.

As long as there is a zero low tour price, verbal insults to people who don't buy things are inevitable, whether it's cynicism or direct insults, we must do everything we can to make people who spend money feel welcome and superior. This is the same as a free-to-play online game model that may appear in the future -

Those who spend money pay for a money field, and those who don't spend money pay people and support a personal field. People who don't spend money rely on being compared and insulted by those who spend money and look for a sense of superiority, so that people who spend money are more willing to spend money to pretend to be forced to bridge the cost of traveling in vain for those who don't spend money.

Specifically, in online games, free players provide RMB players with resources to be killed, and make RMB players happy by being killed like their grandsons. Specifically, in the low-cost group, this dignity value transaction is achieved through the guide's groveling compliments to shoppers and insults to white-handed rubbers.

Therefore, the question returns to the most essential level: the law allows people to trade and sell their personal dignity commercially? From the perspective of civil law, it is obvious that personal dignity is not within the scope of the subject matter of civil acts.

From the perspective of criminal law, at most, the 'crime of insult' is a private prosecution crime, and it is ignored, but this only recognizes that people can give up the pursuit of insults to themselves, and it does not mean that insults can be traded. In fact, we are not even allowed to be humiliated to the level of 'selling ourselves in line', let alone selling human dignity.

Therefore, I think that there is a limit to a person's betrayal of dignity, and this bottom limit is that if he is only in a hurry to do everything for his own survival and development, these minimum necessary needs to live, I pity them very much. Beggars beg in order to survive, which is protected by law.

But tourism is not a 'necessity to maintain the right to live', you can't die if you don't travel, and you can't die if you don't buy luxury goods. This is also the root cause of the crime of counterfeiting and selling counterfeit goods for the sake of luxury goods, and the tourism industry will be illegal in the future.

As long as it is not necessary for survival, man cannot sell his right to human dignity. The right to human dignity is lower than the right to subsistence but higher than the tradable right of other ordinary civil acts, and cannot be sold unless it is necessary for survival.

If someone opens up a trading channel for us Chinese to sell their human dignity in order to make money, it is hurting the international image of all the people and lowering the average dignity of the Chinese in the world. As a tycoon in the luxury industry who elevates the dignity of the Chinese nation in the world, I cannot sit idly by. ”

In other words, if you encounter the kind of subsidy in the future, will Gu Kun kill them all?

Because in any case, it is not a sin to use a bargain, and it is not a sin to buy a bargain. Although the subsidy has achieved rapid expansion, in the long run, many of the things it sells are low-quality and can indeed be sold so cheaply, which is the real cost advantage of Huaxia manufacturing.

Gu Kun is very sympathetic to people who can't afford to use expensive things, and hopes that they can always use cheap things and improve their quality of life when they have limited money.

is still the same sentence, whether Gu Kun can forgive the bargain is to see if it can be "always so cheap", you can do it forever so cheap, and it is not unfair competition in law.

You can't be so cheap "forever" just to squeeze competitors out of competition for a period of time, that's not tolerated, there's not much to say.

It can't be said that their behavior is justified from the beginning, that is, the historical concept of success and defeat without discipline has no sense of right and wrong.

In this life, with Gu Kun acting for the heavens, King Cheng Luliu will not think about a good death in the future.

What's more, among the five original sins of subsidy, the original sin of online travel companies is the heaviest, because what they sell is not a necessity for survival, not something that will die if they don't sell personal dignity transactions - you don't need money to go out to take a taxi, but there is still a bit of a rigid need attribute (although it is not a rigid need, because it is expensive to take a taxi and you can use public transportation, so taking a taxi is still somewhat pretending to be a bit of a forced attribute), but tourism definitely has no survival just need attribute.

Gu Kun can't sit idly by and watch that kind of person open up a trading platform for the Chinese to sell their human dignity for non-rigid needs.