Gu Kun and Soros's mouth cannon cannons cannons can't be finished in one day.

And he is not stupid, it is impossible for him to be limited by Soros's proposition, and only confront the other party in the field of "financial laws".

Gu Kun is not a financier or an economist, and he is not good at these nonsense. All his knowledge of the Southeast Asian financial crisis in 97~98 comes from the review of later generations.

This perception can be used to copy the answer and explain it perfectly.

But debating with experts is clearly not enough.

Taking a step back, even if Gu Kun has done a lot of homework and understands a lot of words and theories in economic and financial debates, it is not appropriate for him to say this-

How can you, a world superstar and Emperor Lan Fangtu, be so capable of squirting like a professor in a financialist country?

This does not fit Gu Kun's personality.

Therefore, Gu Kun chose very wisely "You hit yours, I hit mine"

If Soros wants to talk about economics and philosophy, Gu Kun will never respond positively, he only refutes it from the field of international relations and the topic of globalization ideology.

Talking about the topic of international relations in the professional field, this is very in line with Gu Kun's personality, and even Zhu Youdong can say a few words.

Because the emperors of those small countries in the world are basically born from pondering international relations, the smaller the country, the more they have to study this.

If the research is done well, the left and right sources sell the country for glory and sell it well, so that the big country Longyan Dayue leaks out of the fingers of such a star and a half of aid funds, it is more awesome than a small country fighting for a few years on its own.

Otherwise, how can you use the words "big brother, I don't want to work hard" to squeeze the highest returns?

In contrast, the self-proclaimed "philosopher" of Soros, a financial speculator who is too inclined to set principles, is relatively weak in the field of international relations that requires him to talk about people and talk nonsense.

The biggest principle of international relations is that there is no principle. You have to pay attention to maximizing interests, pay attention to sparse relatives, help relatives and not help people, and people who like to set philosophy and principles to engage in national relations are absolutely fatal.

Several short verbal battles were fought from mid-December to late December.

The media also spread from the beginning of the television station to the later newspapers, magazines, and paper media.

Because of his lack of national relations, Soros has won the support of economists from many universities, including those in Malaya and Thailand, but his supporters are limited to the elite of high society.

However, the extreme resentment of the people in Southeast Asia against Soros has been fanned by Gu Kun. Every cold sentence of Soros's reasoning was used by Gu Kun to pull hatred.

Gu Kun understands very well that it doesn't matter what the brick family says, what he wants is to make the five or six billion people in Southeast Asia hate Soros to death, and by the way, hate this hatred again.

On December 24, Christmas Eve, Gu Kun once again took advantage of the holiday and spent a lot of money and resources to get several heavyweight media such as the New York Times to issue an appeal about him.

In fact, the content of the appeal is nothing, it is nothing more than a petition to a certain secretary of state of the Oceanic State, on behalf of the people of several Southeast Asian countries, asking the secretary of state of the Oceanic State to publicly express its position, whether Soros's attitude represents the attitude of the government of the Oceanic State towards the allies of Southeast Asia, and whether the various goodwill economic policies made by Southeast Asian countries based on their trust in the globalization propaganda of the Oceanic State should be harmed.

This appeal has little effect. In the same way that the White House would later have to make a formal response to issues that had amassed 100,000 signatures, the other side was pressured to talk, but not necessarily to make any substantive push.

But after all, Gu Kun is the world's top traffic celebrity, and he has recently operated a lot of media power co-branding, and many people in Southeast Asia know about this.

The authorities of several countries such as Malaysia and Thailand are also about to divert internal pressure because of the financial crisis, so some people in these countries have also seconded Gu Kun to ask Oceania to make an official response to this matter.

His Excellency Secretary O'Moubu can only respond, to the effect that it is a few principled words at the ideological level: Oceania supports all free market economies, including the financial sector, and maintains free market economies.

These words are not to support Soros, nor are they saying that Soros is wrong, but nothing more than painless words.

Just as when the White House was asked by 100,000 people to answer the question "Please ask the government of the Oceanic country to stipulate that tofu brain can only be eaten sweet", it also politely responded with a sentence "This belongs to personal freedom, and it is not within the jurisdiction of the government authorized by the previous law to administer according to law", not to say that sweet or salty is better.

However, at a time when so many countries in Southeast Asia are mourning, this kind of tough and cold response will more or less further subtlet the attitude of the uneducated masses in Southeast Asia towards the Oceanic countries.

And Gu Kun is also waiting for this moment, he is finally ready to ruthlessly put Soros into the army after a certain secretary of state and other representatives of the official attitude of Oceania countries to the outside world are pulled into the water.

On December 25, Christmas Day, Gu Kun went to Kuala Lumpur again and appeared on a talk show on Malay National Television.

……

This time, it is purely a personal show interview, a bit like the number of ways Sa Beining interviewed Ma Feng in later generations, a platform, a host, and a bunch of onlookers who are still a bit of identity.

Although he knew that Gu Kun might say something disrespectful to the Western powers, considering that there were many complaints in Malaysia, the Malaysian side turned a blind eye.

Letting a foreigner say something is always less offensive than saying something from a foreign dignitary.

The hostess is still Dani Green last time, and after she finished a bunch of foreshadowing words, she asked commendally: "Mr. Gu Kun, the recent dialogue between you and Mr. Soros and even some other Western dignitaries has caused heated discussions among the people. What would you like to say about their latest response?"

Then, there's a highlight reel of how Soros and some people in Oceania are backlashing — something that doesn't show in the studio, but the audience in front of the TV can see it.

After the camera cut back, Gu Kun said frankly: "I think that since they have all said this, I actually have nothing to refute directly." I believe that I have all understood my previous views, especially on 'economic and financial policies are also a continuation of politics and even international relations'.

Just as Clausewitz said that war is a continuation of politics, a country's foreign-related economic policy is, of course, a continuation of international relations. In the case of Thailand's previous move to tie the Thai baht exchange rate to the US dollar, this is indeed a lazy policy that has led to the accumulation of risks.

But we cannot deny that Thailand has not been bound since ancient times, it only began to be so bound after the collapse of Lucia in 91, and the Thai authorities did so out of trust in the free world that the oceanic countries can lead the new era.

However, Soros's recent rhetoric that he wants to correct these 'lazy policies' with philosophy and a correct understanding of the world means that Thailand is wrong based on its trust in Oceania. His Excellency Ao Moubu said that all this has nothing to do with the official Oceania, that is, he is saying, 'I didn't let you relax your vigilance because you trusted Oceania, it was you who relaxed your vigilance'.

This is not surprising to me at all, because the Oceanic countries have a centuries-old tradition of pitting people in the name of supporting absolute financial freedom, and I must clear their name, and they are not targeting us Southeast Asian people, because they are even their own people in this way-

Two hundred years ago, when Oceania was just becoming independent, friends who are not good at studying history may have overlooked one event, that is, the Shees uprising in Oceania. What is the essence of that matter? It is tens of thousands of soldiers who shed their blood for the independence of the Oceanic countries, because the government could not survive on the arrears of military salaries during the Revolutionary War, so they could only take the paid Confederate bonds and sell them at a low discount to financial speculators led by John Hancock.

So after the success of the independence of Oceania, John Hancock forced tens of thousands of Continental Army soldiers to ruin their families, and those people fought for the country for eight years, and as a result, even their houses and farms were mortgaged and deprived. What did that old Hamilton scum say? It's the same response we hear today. If they want to defend financial freedom, the vested interests of speculators must be protected! So they later stirred up tens of thousands of rebels, and they had to bring Peanuton out again to exterminate them.

Soros is the contemporary John Hancock, and some people in Oceania are also the contemporary Hamilton - of course, with their three views, they may still be complacent about being called the contemporary Hamilton, they have never been ashamed of being Hamilton, and they still print Hamilton on the dollar. ”

Gu Kun's words were so unrestrained that the TV station wanted to pinch the recording. Luckily, I realized that this was not a live broadcast, so I decided to cut out some of the footage at that time.

The hostess was also a little scared, and hurriedly forcibly brought the words back: "This seems to be a bit far, we don't care what the attitude of the Oceanic Nation team is to their own people, let's talk about whether their attitude should be and whether it is in line with justice." ”

Gu Kun smiled: "Indeed, I don't need to find a historical source for them, let's talk about it for now." Now, according to Oceania, any country that lacks an eye based on trust in Oceania is a lack of heart, that is, it lacks an eye and is no one else.

Any act of using public opinion, undermining trust, and other means in accordance with international law to suppress and harvest other countries' economic expectations should also be included in the new norms of international exchanges. The asymmetry and opacity of the rules will soon be eliminated, and the next time others learn from each other, it will inevitably lead to a comprehensive and drastic deterioration of the international environment, and at that time, the Oceania countries will probably have to swallow the bitter fruit. ”

Hostess Dani: "Can you be specific? What you just said about it seems to lack a basis in reality. ”

Gu Kun: "Of course, you can be specific, but before that, I suddenly thought of an example. ”

Read the URL: