Chapter 0376 Report [SAARC Plus 5]
Others are afraid of reporters, but Lin Haven is not afraid. Pen ~ fun ~ pavilion www.biquge.info
These days, clean, conscientious journalists, not without it, but relatively few. Especially for a hodgepodge gossip magazine like "South China Weekly", the entertainment section attracts attention, and it is not an exaggeration to say that the social section is used to generate income. The other ones are equivalent to supporting the façade, and he had made an appointment with Lin Haven earlier for an emotional manuscript, but he squirted back with a mouthful of saliva.
With a bookworm in hand, I took the "South China Weekly" magazine one by one and flipped it over as a pastime. What blackmail, what is soft, what influences public opinion, etc., as long as you have it in your mind when you write the manuscript, don't want to miss any of it, the question is just whether the evidence is good or not, and if you can find the evidence, Lin Haven can do it.
"South China Weekly" belongs to the South China Newspaper Group, which is a newspaper group under Tiannan Province and claims to be a newspaper group that can stand opposite the "People's X Newspaper" series. "South China Weekly" is not the main product of the group, "South China Weekly" is the flagship journal that carries the ding, and its influence is particularly great. In addition, there are "South China Metropolis", "World Global", "South China People", "Sports Weekly", as well as many cultural products such as economy, agriculture, military, fashion, entertainment and so on. It is not an exaggeration to say that it occupies a small half of China's newspaper and journalism industries.
Jianyun City, the capital of Tiannan Province, on the most prosperous Tianshui Street, house number 2 is the headquarters of South China Newspaper, and the headquarters of "South China Weekly" is also located here.
Fang Jundong's face was gloomy and he was called to the office by Tian Weisheng, the editor-in-chief of the weekly.
"It's you who doesn't light up in the east and light up in the west, right?"
"Yes. ”
"If you have an idea about the documentary "Tip of the Tongue", you can write a newspaper to report it, why do you want to comment privately?" Tian Weisheng's question does not mean interfering with the freedom of expression of the reporters below, but they also have requirements that they cannot privately disseminate opinions on sensitive people and things, especially controversial opinions - Lin Haven is the so-called sensitive person.
This is what happened after CCTV apologized.
"I don't understand why Lin Haven was on that list, he's just an entertainment company owner, well, a painter and a writer...... But I don't really think it's necessary for him to be considered sensitive. ”
Fang Jundong, 29 years old, has a master's degree in journalism from China Communications, and is the youngest first-class reporter of "South China Weekly", and his pen is very sharp - if it weren't for this, he would not necessarily be able to translate the commentary on "The Tip of the Tongue". He has never had a good impression of Lin Haven, and when the art world was arguing about the meaning of the little tofu block in "Art Review", the interview and draft of "South China Weekly" were written by Fang Jundong.
"You know a p, his poetry collection is regarded as a national gift, the songs he writes are praised by the top level, the dramas he filmed, six engineering awards, and five red flag awards. Isn't that enough? Do you really think that the group is based on his high ratings? Because he has many fans? Because he has a big temper? These things, one by one, are all looked at by the top. Besides, no one said that you should not be allowed to report on Lin Haven, and no one said that you must report positively, you can have negative comments, you write a manuscript, evaluate it, and put it in the magazine openly, can't you?"
The intention of the South China Weekly, or the newspaper industry, is nothing more than to use the signboard of "fairness and freedom of the press" to silence some people.
Fang Jundong was said without saying a word, he didn't take it, he felt that he was aware of current affairs, and he was fighting against Tian Weisheng?
"Shall I delete it?"
"Don't worry about that, you go to Lao Guan, he is writing a review of "Tip of the Tongue", and you cooperate with him to do it. Tian Weisheng frowned, "South China Weekly" is rampant, and there are really few people who dare to scold him so famously, and he is not willing to endure it.
Fang Jundong's eyes lit up.
"Yes, editor-in-chief. ”
On the third day, "South China Weekly" came out on the street, and the cover was Bai Tingyun, the president of Tianjie, who had just been listed on the IPO, and under his name, there was a line of bold letters: "Behind the popular "Tip of the Tongue", does sincerity need to be true?"
Guan Zhe is the old Guan in Tian Weisheng's mouth, the reporter of the social edition of "Weekly", and the commentary in his hand is also placed in the social edition, and the text can be described as sharp.
In the documentary "Tip of the Tongue", there must be some editing, Guan Zhe's eyes are very poisonous, and I don't know how many times I have watched it, in short, I found eight places.
For example, when collecting matsutake mushrooms, he took some pictures during the matsutake season, and later made up for the picture, and then edited and synthesized them, and he found them through the conditions of leaves, plant flowering and other conditions.
The most important reason for the ...... that "A Bite of China" has received a lot of praise is that the audience believes that this documentary not only evokes the feelings and memories of the food collected in various places, but also is extremely sincere and moving from production to concept, which is a rare sincerity work in recent years. However, this magazine found that as a self-titled documentary, "Tip of the Tongue" is filled with a large number of synthetic and edited images that exist in the service of sensationalism. We interviewed some documentary filmmakers, and they all said that this is not the attitude and behavior that a sincere documentary should have.
This may make the creative team of "A Bite of the Tongue" think about whether the sincere documentary they are pursuing needs to be based on truth? If they don't even have truth, then how can they talk about sincerity?"
It seems to be to the point, but it is actually a bullshit report.
Documentaries need to be true, which is an infallible truth, but truth does not mean that you do not use editing and synthesis techniques, or even that you cannot sensationalize. It should show that everything in the documentary is real, and the combination of key elements is real. In "Tip of the Tongue", it is not contrary to reality to use materials from different seasons to produce the show, and if there is no local tradition of collecting matsutake mushrooms, the show forcibly creates all this, which is called a violation of reality.
The South China Weekly clearly intends to use this to mislead its readers.
The impact is there, and how many people can't find a point of criticism in the rave reviews, and the manuscript of "South China Weekly" is ammunition. However, the impact is not big, at least it will not affect everyone's expectations for the second season, and it will not affect the pursuit of broadcast rights by major TV stations and websites.
When everyone thought that Lin Haiwen was going to ignore the news, or directly refute the scolding, he didn't, he just posted a ******: "****** about the real-name report of Guan Zhe, a reporter from South China Weekly".
Many people suddenly have a sense of familiarity, as if before, there were such times.
Er Cao's body and name are destroyed, and the rivers and rivers will not be wasted?
Zhang Yun (To be continued.) )