Wang Peng and Lu Danze did not return to China with Lin Haiwen, they are not guarding "Black Dragon Pond", to be honest, there is no second person in the world who can imitate this painting at present, it is impossible to drop the bag, as for stealing - if "Black Dragon Pond" is stolen by thieves at this time, you can also consider closing the door.

Although museums in Europe and the United States will open a lot of places for painters or students to copy, but at this juncture, the copy certificate is quite special, whether it is the scope of coverage, or the preciousness of the paintings, it is not the same as the general copy certificate.

Lin Haven himself was in Paris, and he also had a period of copying and benefited a lot.

……

By the time Lin turned his head and left, the news had gone beyond the scope of art media and into the mass media.

After all, both the New York Times and NBC are large media conglomerates, and once they think that news is popular, they just change the layout.

"After the news that Haven Lin's new work will be exhibited with the giants, it quickly triggered a cascading effect, at an auction in Seattle, one of Haven Lin's works was withdrawn by the seller, we asked Sotheby's staff, he said, the seller clearly told them that the price of Haven Lin's work is very likely to soar, and this is not a good time to sell.

We can imagine that in the next month, Lin Haven's works may not appear at auction.

In fact, just over a week ago, Lin Haven had just become a painter with a single work of more than 10 million euros, ranking among the most expensive artists in the world. When the new record was made, it also caused a lot of controversy and discussion, a 26-year-old oil painter, the price of 12.5 million euros, does this represent the overheating of the art market? But obviously collectors and art institutions do not agree with this, the Rockefeller Art Foundation, the Kering Art Foundation, the American Contemporary Art Foundation...... and many other world-class foundations, almost simultaneously raised the reference prices of many of Lin Haiwen's works, ranging from 6 million to 12 million.

However, just a week later, the art market seems to be about to accept another explosive news belonging to Lin Haven - if the Met's assessment is accepted, how much is the work of a classical painter who can be compared to Ingres, Tixiang and other famous artists of centuries ago, and a painter who has pioneered a new era of classical painting in the capital since the 19th century? Richter, who is sometimes referred to as a pop artist, sells for nearly $40 million per piece. Whether Lin has a chance to surpass him may no longer be a suspenseful question, and what we should ask is when and at what age he will surpass that number.

Usually people talk about the sky-high price of paintings, often from modern artists, such as Tombley's "Blackboard", Pollock's "Lavender Field", etc., these abstract masterpieces that often cost tens of millions of dollars, always raise a lot of doubts. This time, Lin Haven is afraid that he will lead the discussion on the price of the works of classical painters, and in any case, the classical painters, who have all but disappeared from the public eye, will use this opportunity to regain attention.

But whether it is Lin Haven or modern artists, the market needs to think carefully about whether they are in line with those sky-high prices, and whether the emergence of these sky-high works will do more harm than harm to the art market?"

This is a report from the New York Times, which pays close attention to Lin Haven and basically hasn't missed Lin Haven's big events, but it often has a bit of a negative hint, and they prefer Badanwang's kind.

Comparatively speaking, NBC is more friendly to Lin Haven.

They spent a lot of time describing Linhaven's current value and how it was recognized by the industry, and then talking about the level of the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York, and its status in the global museum world, to prove that "obviously Haven Lin's artistic standards have been fully recognized by this world-famous art museum, and we may no longer doubt whether Haven Lin is qualified to be on a par with Leonardo da Vinci, but we should think about what kind of impact a new classical academic master will have on art, philosophy, and our thinking after 200 years." For more than a century, has the pursuit of the individual, the heart, rebellion and disorder ushered in a turning point?

Either way, Haven Lin will usher in a new personal peak and continue his artistic legend. ”

If the traditional media is still conscientious and trying to unearth something profound from this matter, then social media is much more "shallow".

on Facebook.

Since Anna sent out the first related post, to the trend of the prairie fire at this time, everyone has paid the most attention to one word: money.

The aftermath of 12.5 million has not yet dissipated.

Higher value expectations have swept in.

"Even if his paintings are as good as Leonardo da Vinci, so what? It's not an antique, how can it be worth so much money, I think 12.5 million is already very exaggerated, okay, everyone thinks too much, and maybe someone is behind it, in fact, the upside of Lin Haven's works is not that big at all, and it is already remarkable to be able to maintain a level of more than 10 million. ”

- "Dude, at first glance, you are a Chinese, and what about antiques, Lao Mei has a history of more than 200 years, what antiques can there be? In Huaguo, that is, the middle and late Thai Dynasty, you go and take a look, how many of the antiques with a history of 200 years are valuable because of time? Look at Pollock's people, who are often hundreds of millions of yuan, and have a history of several years? Oil paintings depend on the status of art history, why is Pollock expensive? Isn't it because he is a representative of Abstract Expressionism that Lin Haven is the same, if he can put the source classicism on the ground, really start a sect, and connect the classical painting veins that have been broken for 200 years, he will not sell them cheaper than Pollock. ”

- "He's only 26 years old, and Pollock is dead, can you compare?"

- "First, I didn't say that he could be sold for more than Pollock when he was alive, and second, according to Lin Haven's creative volume, although he is young, he can basically be regarded as dying. 5 paintings a year, when he can paint until he is 75 years old, that is, 50 years, but 250 paintings, even art galleries and museums all over the world are not enough, let alone private collectors, foundations, etc., if he never works hard to live, it is not surprising that he surpasses Pollock when he is alive. ”

The argument between the two Chinese people was rational at first, but when more people got involved, the argument turned into a big fight.

"Isn't the landlord just not looking down on the Chinese painters? hehe, but people are just okay, and I'm angry with you. ”

"The heart of a villain. ”

"Bah, you're still pretending, last time Francis Bacon sold for 130 million dollars, you still praised his stinky feet, but when Lin Haven arrived, oh, the painting is as good as Leonardo da Vinci, it's not worth 10 million dollars, don't be too obvious with your double standard, why don't you pretend to be special." ”

"What kind of art do I appreciate more, it's my freedom, you brainwashed idiot, get out of the way. ”