Each has its own things, each is busy with its own work, and at the same time as searching a lesson to obtain the information of the big alliance through the hackers of Dongtang University, the police technical department is also analyzing the hospital computer provided by Ling Hulan, there is no doubt that Ling Hulan is right, there is indeed a Shangquan tooth record that was deleted by the machine and not uploaded to the hospital database.

When the police admitted that the information did exist, the ensuing court debate began to revolve over the record.

The focus is on which of the two different dental records the police should trust.

The judicial department has also made a killer move, known as the representative of the new generation of prosecutors, and Sima Luo, who is now Chinese New Year's Eve three years old, has joined the police lawyer team.

After the trial began, the court soon became a battlefield between Sima Luo and Ling Hulan, and the well-prepared two sides engaged in an all-out battle over which record to accept.

Ling Hulan's opinion is inconclusive, and the most critical evidence of whether Shangquan died is the tooth left at the scene, and now there is evidence to prove that this tooth does not belong to Shangquan himself. Even if Shangquan left evidence in the clinic, it can only be said that there must be a fake double certificate. Jurisprudence says that when a piece of evidence is in doubt, it should not be included as evidence.

Sima Luo argued that although the hospital had records, there was a lack of witnesses, and the records had been deleted, and whatever the reason for the deletion was the record, it meant that the records were not credible. Looking at the clinic records of Shangquan, there are witnesses, there is physical evidence, and the evidence is complete and perfect, so what is in doubt is only the evidence of the hospital, and the evidence of the clinic is not suspicious.

Ling Hulan counterattacked, the police had the obligation to prove whether the deceased was Shangquan, but the police ignored the hospital evidence and only believed the clinic evidence one-sidedly, and the evidence collection was very unobjective.

Ling Hulan invited a jurist to appear in court, and the jurist believed that this was not a simple civil lawsuit, and the plaintiff, that is, Ling Hulan, did not need to prove the authenticity of the hospital's evidence. On the contrary, as a police officer, it is obliged to prove that the hospital evidence is false. If the police cannot produce evidence to prove that the hospital evidence is false, then the police must admit the hospital evidence. And when two different pieces of admissible evidence appear, the police cannot draw conclusions based on conjecture alone, or hang up the case, indicating that Shangquan's life and death are unknown. Either continue the investigation until there is stronger evidence.

Sima Luo also has expert witnesses, and the expert witnesses believe that in order for the hospital evidence to be accepted by the police, Ling Hulan must first prove a question as to why this evidence was deleted. Experts believe that it is most likely that Dr. Ono found out that he had entered the wrong patient information and deleted it.

Ling Hulan could only reason about the process of the case, and Sima Luo refuted that everything was Ling Hulan's reasoning, without any evidence to support it, and could not explain the reason why this evidence was deleted. Sima Luo, for example, made a will, and after a few days was not satisfied with the will, so he used a paper shredder to process the will. So may I ask, can someone stitch together the fragments of a will be considered a legal will?

Of course not.

Ling Hulan took a step back, believing that there were now definite suspicions, so it was reasonable for the police to withdraw the report of Shangquan's death and continue the investigation, unless there was stronger non-dental evidence to determine Shangquan's life and death. Because the dental evidence is doubtful, it can no longer be applied to the key evidence to measure Shangquan's life and death. She wants to veto the legitimacy of the clinic's dental records with hospital dentistry.

Sima Luo took advantage of the situation and explained by eyewitness and other testimonies that after Shangquan got into the car, the car did not stop until around the time of the fire, during which the view on the street was relatively wide, and two witnesses on the left and right sides of the street testified that they did not see people leaving the car, so it can be concluded that Shangquan had died.

Ling Hulan believes that the police can only conclude, not certainly, that Shangquan is dead. At the same time, Ling Hulan disagreed with Sima Luo's statement, there were many large and small trucks on the street at that time, and there were also cars. In addition, the surveillance footage was done by two monitors, and there was a blind spot in the center seven meters away due to leaves.

Sima Luo admits that there are blind spots in surveillance, but he uses the scene map as an example, the location of each witness, and the location of the car on the road to monitor and photograph, and believes that the witness has no blind spot.

Ling Hulan replied: Because of the blind spots, it cannot be ruled out that Shangquan used the blind spots to jump out of the car and remotely ignite the car. It was not possible for the witnesses to pay attention to the car before it caught fire, and in that respect all four witnesses were suspicious.

Sima Luo said that the monitoring showed that the car stopped after an open flame appeared while driving. Suppose Shangquan jumped out of the car at the blind spot, then who stepped on the brakes after the open flame?

The court said that if Linghulan could no longer provide favorable explanations, the next court session would directly announce the outcome of the case.

There was a major problem in the joint handling of the case, and Ling Hulan carried out a Linghulan-style defense according to Cao Yun's ideas, but Ling Hulan did not know that Cao Yun's ideas had to take a delicate route. For example, when defending the Shangquan case, Cao Yun calculated the time to the minute, and vetoed the possibility of Shangquan committing the crime logically and competently. Ling Hulan is to put the details, grasp the overall situation, hit a little, and a little general will be successful.

The two should have been able to complement each other in theory, but there was a serious mistake in practice, which made Hulan lose the overall situation, although the police were a little painful to play a little, but in the end, because of the lack of the overall situation, and because the defense was not delicate enough, it was impossible to directly link the hospital dental records with the case, which led to a fiasco.

……

An hour after the trial, Ling Hulan and Cao Yun sat on the outdoor balcony on the second floor of a café, and the two did not speak for a long time.

Cao Yun: "Time is too urgent. Jean was referring to the fact that there were only a few hours between the breakthrough and the start of the trial.

"No, it was a mistake in the first place. Ling Hulan looked up at Cao Yun: "I'm not good at fighting details, I was prepared for the debate around my teeth, but I didn't scrutinize every sentence in detail, because this is not my style." I think that after the testimony of legal experts, it can overwhelm Sima Luo. However, the details of the evidence were not elaborated. That is, there is no cause, only so. Sima Luo saw that I only had a reason, but not a cause, and immediately hit me to fight back, which made me a little confused. ”

Cao Yun nodded slowly and didn't speak, during the trial, Ling Hulan thought that Shangquan's tooth was a tooth that had been removed from the hospital, and Cao Yun knew that it was not good as soon as this opinion came out. Because there is no evidence to back this up. If Ling Hulan said that Shangquan's teeth were suspicious, and asked the police to veto the hospital's deleted dental report, the police would inevitably fall into passivity because they had the obligation to investigate the truth.