"Orthodoxy is not correct, but it is insisted on by Confucius, and it is also followed by the disciples of Confucius and Mencius in the past dynasties, and the rulers of the past dynasties obey it; and your ancestors are correct, this is your conclusion, right?

Seeing that the topic of hearing about the people was a little scattered, Baili Liangliu retracted for a while, and he was still affected by the bad principal who told them to go back and report the results. Pen Fun Pavilion wWw. ｂiquge。 ｉｎfo

I can be sure that the orthodoxy advocated and defended by Confucius is not correct; whether the patriarch's insistence is correct or not, I think it is only a possibility; Confucius's affirmation and error of the ancestors, and the possible correctness of the ancestors, I judge from an objective point of view, and definitely support my ancestors, although all his actions are only limited to some of his ideas, and I would like to take a few minutes of your time to share my summary with you about my position.

"First, why is it said that Confucius's orthodoxy is not right? Let's first look at this so-called orthodox aid -- its source is the ruler! The core idea of Confucius is to safeguard everything of the ruler, the monarch is the subject of the subject, and the monarch wants the subject to die, and the minister does not dare not die; then what is everything about the ruler, that is, the will of a king, his rule, his interests, his purpose, and his preferences; Confucius's proposition revolves around such a person and is absolutely obedient to him! Therefore, the core concept of Confucius is that there is no heaven above and no people below, but only a king in the middle, that is, a supreme core authority created by him, who is in charge of everything.

"The correct order should be the first providence, the second public opinion, and the third is the opinion of the king who acts as a representative intermediary in the middle, and Confucius's absolutization of the third king will bring the entire political reality and history into a wrong direction, and the will of the king will be more and more concentrated on his personal preferences and interests, without regard for the will of heaven and the people's feelings, so I say that the so-called orthodoxy of Confucius, from the beginning to the end, is not orthodoxy, but the wrong path. The wrong direction leads to moral turpitude and all kinds of problems, one of which is often misunderstood and overlooked, and one of the phenomena is the peasant rebellion. ”

This topic seems a bit profound. You don't think you're giving face to the people who are talking because you're not drowsy, and it seems hopeless to get them to give a warm response.

However, Wenren Bogu and Baili Liangliu are definitely very interested.

Even Huasheng is very devoted.

His Hua family has always been very concerned about people's livelihood.

Baili Liangliu said: "It seems that orthodoxy, which has been taken for granted for a long time, is really a problem! But what is the relationship between the peasant rebellion and this one?

If those rulers have a correct sense of orthodoxy, should they put the people first and should not let the people suffer to the point of starvation? What does this mean because they themselves spend all their days and drink all the time, and the people will starve to death, and they will still expropriate and extort money to satisfy their flowers, so that if they do not rebel, they will starve to death immediately! This shows that they have set themselves against the people and put the people to death for their own enjoyment! Can such a rule be orthodox? What kind of people are they who are opposed to the people? What is the essence of the people? They are the main body of the state! They are opposed to the people, they are the enemies of the people, and they are actually the enemies of the country! How can the enemies of a country become the orthodoxy of the country? It is only Confucius, who was willing to be the drummer of those kings, that he came up with such a set of theories, which are actually the theory of bandits! Moral decay and lack of fame. Poverty and weakness, and the country will not be a country, all of which are the consequences of the implementation of the Tao of Confucius and Mencius!"

This thing is really infuriating!

Look at the one who makes people angry!

He is just talking, and you can imagine how angry people who live under that so-called orthodoxy have been suppressed by that so-called orthodoxy for more than 2,000 years.

Now I also understand that the Tao of Confucius and Mencius is a theory that fundamentally reverses right and wrong and confuses black and white! When he does that, he naturally has his own reasoning, but in essence it is opposed to the people, and this must be made clear! They are so careless about human life, and naturally they are also contrary to the way of life! Since this is the case, your ancestor is against him, he should be right, and you might as well talk about this?"

"Okay! Since Brother Lianglu wants to hear it, I'll talk about it briefly. ”

Wen Tong has a smile today.

"First, Confucius said that the minds and minds of the ancestors were contrary to orthodoxy, different, and the sword went sideways, and they took risks, and they were going to dangerous situations that no one had ever experienced, which proved that the ancestors did not join them in the same stream.

Second, Confucius said that the ancestors not only had extreme ideas, but also guided his behavior, causing him to behave in a desolate manner, and if he did it by chance, he could be tolerant of it, but he still stubbornly insisted on it, and went all the way to the black; this also shows that the ancestors were strong-willed, that is, they did not go along with them.

Third, Confucius said that none of the words of the ancestors were true, but they were all sophistries for his thoughts and actions, and that an idea that ran counter to orthodoxy and what he did according to the guidance of that thought was the truth; the implication was that the ancestors said that Confucius's so-called orthodoxy was a fallacy, and this should be the earliest systematic theory to expose and refute Confucius's orthodoxy, and the ancestors had foresight and wisdom.

Fourth, Confucius said that the ancestors never forgot things that were different from orthodoxy and behavior, which completely violated the strict precept that should be kept secret for the Venerable, and the most infuriating thing was that he also collected all the things that should be kept silent and talked about endlessly in that circle, without saving face for Confucius and other leading figures, and blindly spreading rumors to confuse the public, and only by destroying him could the world be peaceful; this obviously means that the existence and thoughts of the ancestors have seriously threatened their so-called orthodoxy.

Fifth, Confucius said that the ancestors did not follow the orthodox and upright path, but followed the unorthodox evil ideas and actions, and benefited from it, and received the favors of those who followed, that is, to be supported and supported by them.

It can be seen from this that the clearest thing that the ancestors did was to resolutely disagree with the so-called orthodoxy; and then they had some of their own ideas, and they insisted on them very much, and they were supported by the people, so that they were not tolerated by Confucius, the pseudo-orthodoxy, and they would kill them as soon as possible! Then, with the cooperation of the rulers, they succeeded in killing the ancestors, thus making the erroneous orthodoxy of his ideas rampant for two thousand years. ”