Isn't it a good thing to make the lives of the people on Hong Kong Island better and better? Of course, it is a good thing, but there must be a premise, that is, within your ability, it is naturally good that you have the ability to provide welfare to the people, just like a person earns 1,000 yuan a month, and a normal person will spend 2 or 300 yuan a month to eat, and the rest of the money is either to buy some clothes or other needs, and you may be able to save more than 100 yuan in the end, which is very normal.

But if you come up with five or six hundred yuan to eat, and the rest of the money goes to buy things, in the end not only will you not be able to save money, but you will have to use your savings to make up, what if your savings are exhausted? Then you can only live a life of two or three hundred yuan a month to eat.

Hong Kong Island lived this kind of life under the governance of the last Hong Kong Governor, giving great benefits to the people, which far exceeded their own economic capabilities, and almost hollowed out the family funds of Hong Kong Island. At that time, the annual per capita income of Hong Kong Island was more than 15,000 US dollars, and the British were more than 40,000 US dollars.

It's not fatal if the family is gone, and it's a big deal that the state will pay for it itself, but what should the common people do? Do you still give him so many benefits? Obviously, no, because this is no longer in line with the laws of a normal country, and it is impossible for any country in the world to do this, but if you don't give it, you will fall into the trap of the British, and look at it, we British people will be finished as soon as they leave Hong Kong Island, and it is all your responsibility for China, and it has nothing to do with me.

Fuck you! It has nothing to do with you? It's just that you fools can see it, but there are a bunch of Hong Kong Island people who can't see it, and think that the British are good, the British are wonderful, and the British are croaking.

This has caused a large number of "accumulated grievances" among the people, which in turn have buried hidden dangers.

It has to be said that the British have been clever in their means of playing intrigue and trickery, and have even reached the point of reaching the pinnacle, especially on such a major issue as sovereignty, and no one in the world can do it right, and the border problems between China and India are their own, the border problems between India and Pakistan are their own, and the South Korean and North Korean are also their hands, and the "son" of the British, the Americans, have inherited Lao Tzu's ability, and they have also created a lot of trouble in the world.

Their method of "good welfare" is indeed very clever, at least in the previous life, many people did not realize the harm, even if the national high-level found out that it was useless to protest many times, people said that we have formulated a policy, can not be changed, and in the end the country can only swallow the consequences, but at that time, not many people really realized how big the consequences are, and it will be a disaster for many years.

In fact, the problem of Hong Kong Island is not only in the welfare system, but also in all aspects by the British "tricked", for example, when the British left, they secretly issued "passwords" to more than 50,000 people in Hong Kong, they are all the elite of society, as long as they take out this password, they will immediately obtain the status of the United Kingdom, and they can take their property to live in the United Kingdom.

This is not the most powerful, there is even more powerful, that is, the British left a group of teachers with a strong idea of "licking dogs" in the school, let them teach those children, "brainwash" the children, and make them extremely disagree with China's identity, so that they feel that Britain is good, the British are a civilized country, and China is not good, it is a "despicable" nation.

In addition, a large number of "dog-licking" elements have also been installed in the Legislative Council on Hong Kong Island, and these people are in high positions even after the return of Hong Kong Island; after all, Hong Kong Island politics adopts European and American law, and the separation of powers is required, which gives them a good opportunity to "show their talents."

The identity of the chief executive of Hong Kong Island must be Hong Kong Islander, but not in the legislature, only three or four of the more than 20 justices have Hong Kong Island identity, and the rest are British.

What is the situation of letting a bunch of British legislate land for China? Can American justices be Chinese? I have never heard of it.

This is a contradictory thing, the return of Hong Kong Island has become China's territory, although it is said that there are two systems, but the premise is one country, that is, China, since it is China's territory, why let a group of foreigners serve in the power organs? It's just nonsense!

This is the conspiracy of the British, who left them on Hong Kong Island in order to control the law in the future.

More than 20 years later, some people on Hong Kong Island marched on the streets under various banners when they had nothing to do, and they said that they were for Hong Kong Island.

Well, the law on Hong Kong Island allows ordinary people to do this, but the premise is that you can't sabotage, but the nature of British and American involvement behind the scenes has changed, and they fanned the flames behind the scenes, not only fanning the flames, but also sending some secret "dog licking" elements of the CIA to conduct professional training, provide them with equipment, and pay them wages after completing relevant work.

With the participation of Britain and the United States, it is no longer an ordinary parade, it has become an organized and planned sabotage activity, not to mention smashing and looting, but also daring to fight against the Hong Kong Island police, yes, it is to dare to do face-to-face with the law enforcement forces.

If you sabotage, the police will take care of you, but a bunch of guys will beat up the police in turn, and they will say that it is for the good of Hong Kong Island, where is the good?

The "righteousness and awe-inspiring" that engage in sabotage is like a lost dog that maintains order, and the whole thing is reversed.

The support of Britain and the United States is an important reason, but Hong Kong Island is China's territory, and no matter how arrogant they are, they dare not openly lead a group of "licking dogs" to the streets to make trouble, which is too low-level, and they have a more advanced "card" in their hands, that is, a group of guys who stand on the commanding heights of the law, that is, the people in the legislature.

These people have the right to interpret the law in their hands, and the people who did the sabotage were arrested by the police, and they said that it was okay, just do community public welfare, and the police enforced the law to arrest this group of troublemakers, and they glared: You know the law and break the law, go to prison for half a year!

Is this a law to maintain order? It is simply to defend those lawbreakers and let them beat the police with impunity, and who will dare to enforce the law when they encounter such a situation again over time.

In the movie, the Hong Kong Island police are brave and fearless, and they are tough and resolute in the face of the most vicious gangsters, but as soon as they meet these guys, they immediately coax them, even if they know that the other party has violated the law, they dare not enforce the law normally.

When a law enforcement agency dares to enforce the law, then there is a great hidden danger in this society, and when a legislature favors those who make trouble, then this society is dangerous, and this is the case on Hong Kong Island more than ten years later.

()

Set a small goal first, such as remembering in 1 second: book guest residence