"What's the difference between domestic animals and beasts, Uncle Pan, how do I think the animals here are very different from the outside? Pen Fun Pavilion wWw. ｂiquge。 ｉｎfo”

Seeing Niu Niuzi and those Niu Niu, wrapped intimately together, turning their heads away like family and friends, Wen Ren suddenly popped up a question, and then continued her interview, but the interview subject was changed from Niu Niuzi to Yan Yuanzi.

In fact, this question is also a hundred miles of good questions.

As a student of ancient agriculture, animal husbandry is also within his scope of expertise.

As a major problem in animal husbandry, it is when those wild animals were domesticated as domestic animals.

In the minds of experts, these domestic animals must have been wild beasts at first, but after a period of time and the use of certain means of domestication, they were allowed to remove their wild nature and become docile, and they became domestic animals.

Of course, later on, some domestic animals became pets.

Therefore, scientifically speaking, wild animals, domestic animals, and pets represent the three states of the relationship between animals and people, that is, different levels of intimacy with people.

The general assumption is that this process of change will take a considerable period of time and special means to complete it.

However, since this process of change was achieved in history, it is necessary to find evidence of time to prove that the beast was still a beast before that point, and after that point in time, the beast became a domestic animal.

However, it is difficult to find evidence at this point in time, or even no evidence at all.

Because evidence is a thing, even if the parties deliberately leave it, it may not be able to be preserved for a long time.

For example, if something happens now, make a record.

And this record can be held well in the short term, once it is too long, it is difficult to say.

Consciously keeping records is still the case, let alone how can those chains of evidence be preserved when there are no recorded years.

And in the distant past, when the beast became a domestic animal, no one would have deliberately recorded those things.

Therefore, there is little hope that the historical evidence of this change can be found through archaeology.

Losing confidence in the historical evidence, people can only conjecture when they talk about the process and facts of the transformation of this beast into a domestic animal, because these claims, even if many people agree, are only unproven hypotheses.

As this state lasts for a long time, two types of consequences are formed.

One is that since everyone says so, they regard this kind of thing as a historical fact, and they believe it themselves in the name of animal development history, and let others believe it.

The other is, why keep this hypothesis since it has not been proven?

Is there no other possibility?

It is difficult to guarantee that the other may be a more plausible explanation, perhaps closer to reality.

Those who are willing to think think think of the theory of evolution that once became the mainstream, insisting that man evolved from monkeys, aren't more and more people abandoning it?

In fact, people with a little normal thinking know that if the theory of evolution really exists, in the current world, at any time period, there will be those species that have not ended their evolution between the species from which it came from and the species that are about to change.

But where exactly are such interspecific species?

Not a single one!

The so-called evidence is only an extremely rare example of the form, and it can only be counted as a kind of deformity.

From this, it is conceivable that the illusion of the beast becoming a domestic animal should also be deduced from the theory of evolution.

Since monkeys can be turned into people, so can wild animals become domestic animals.

On the other hand, people can change from monkeys, but why not change domestic animals from wild animals?

It can be seen that the evolution theory of human beings and the domestication of wild animals into domestic animals are a pair of twins.

Thinking of this, Baili Lianglu wanted to know the actual situation here in Gu Nongwu.

At this time, Wenren Bogu was also in good spirits!

Because the things here, because they have been kept in their original state, all the status quo is the oldest original appearance!

For archaeology, or the study of ancient documents, he has gone to great lengths to figure out even a single historical issue.

But here, what he sees and hears is historical reality, the most real history.

So here, the status quo is history.

To clarify the current situation is to solve the historical mystery.

Therefore, as soon as the problem of Wenren came out, she didn't pay special attention to it, but Wenren Bogu and Baili Lianglu were in good spirits.

"Our concept here is very different from that of the people you outside! All the animals here are our friends, so to speak, and they are very close to all of us here, and of course there are people who are very close to them, such as cows and cows, peaks and mountains, and horses, but none of them are enemies of man, just like the tigers, leopards, jackals, and people outside! We distinguish different animals here, but we only make a general division according to the area where they live and the distance of our people. ”

"Can you elaborate on that?"

Wen Ren asked again.

For example, chickens, ducks, geese, pigs, dogs, and cats live around our dwellings, and animals such as horses, cows, sheep, donkeys, elephants, and camels live in the middle of our dwellings and the mountains, while tigers, leopards, lions, bears, wolves, foxes, etc., live in the mountains, farther away from people! However, despite the different distances, we still have frequent opportunities to meet them, for example, no matter how far they live, they always come to the river once a day to drink water, and at that time, adults and children go there and gather for a while! When the time comes, I can take you there, but don't make a fuss, because the children will ride on the backs of lions and tigers. ”

"I want to ride a lion too!"

As soon as I heard that children could ride those ferocious animals, I immediately jumped to try it.

When she was young, she had a dream of riding a lion like a little girl in the circus.

Once, I was so fascinated by watching the circus that I almost followed them.

Baili Liangliu was still more self-aware, and poured a scoop of cold water: "Do you still want to ride a lion?

I woke up when I smelled the strange smell, not to mention the large animals, the small animals have not yet accepted them.

In fact, they are even more pessimistic, as if nothing can accept them!

Subsequently, Pan Yuanzi took them to visit the basic animal gathering place, including a place dedicated to raising donkeys.

It was noted that the place where donkeys are kept and the places where horses are kept is not only quite far away, but also have some other obstacles.

Everyone was puzzled and asked Yuanzi, why everything else is free, but these donkeys are restricted.

Fan Yuanzi didn't elaborate, but said that this was to prevent the donkey and horse from being reluctant and to avoid the appearance of mules.

.