After the premiere, "Fast & Thrill 5" was the center of attention, and in this outpost related to the trend of the opening battle, Universal Pictures successfully took the lead, gaining the recognition of the audience and the media.

"Variety" magazine reversed its previous prediction without any psychological obstacles, and the chief film critic Stephen Hodden praised the film in the film review, and praised Lan Li by name, believing that Lan Li is the key to the chemistry of the film, which coincides with the sample survey of the "Seattle Post".

This not only lifted the curtain on the praise frenzy of "Fast and Thrill/Emotion 5", but also focused all the focus on Lan Li without any burden. Stephen gave 88 points on behalf of "Variety" magazine, which became a wonderful start for the comprehensive evaluation of 43 media outlets, and laid a solid foundation.

Scott-Tobias, a film critic for Us Weekly, opens with a string of interjections, "Jesus Christ, unbelievable!"

This is followed by a string of adjectives, "thrilling, exciting, funny, brisk, beautiful, and more importantly, beyond imagination." This work completely breaks the mold and routine of the previous four series of films, presents a fascinating dark world where crime and justice, friendship and law are intertwined, and presents a wonderful blockbuster scene - not special effects, but actual combat. It has set an excellent precedent for commercial films in this year's summer file, and has set a good benchmark, which is enough to be amazing!"

It ends with a series of declarative sentences, "The success of the film is largely due to Lan Li-Hall, and this new face is more like the real core of the whole movie: can laws and rules be broken in the face of justice, should reason and morality be compromised in the face of emotion, and in the face of absolute force, are fists and brains the right answer?"

The charm of Hall's character, which hides a rich story and strong courage, made its debut, but it became the key to the rebirth of the whole movie!"

Because of Gavin Hunter's relationship, "US Weekly" is considered by many people to be a loyal supporter of Blue Lane, and this time the film critic Scott also continued this trend, giving a high score of 90, which is the only 90 points among the professional film reviews after the premiere of "Fast & Thrill 5", and of course, it is also the first 90 points among the five works in the series.

First "Variety", then "US Weekly", "Fast and Thrill/Emotional 5" showed an absolutely strong posture in the first batch of media comprehensive reviews, coupled with the enthusiastic pursuit of the premiere audience, for a while, this work was booming, bathed in a halo, which is really incredible for a commercial film, and even more incredible for a sequel film that has been criticized for the first four parts of the series.

In fact, "Fast & Thrill 5" isn't all surrounded by flowers and applause.

Pete Travis of Rolling Stone magazine believes that "the plot twist in the movie is reminiscent of the games played by 11-year-old boys on the playground, and the chaos and noise of the ups and downs are like a joke." With the exception of Hobbes, who plays Hale, the other characters seem to be trying to prove, 'I'm handsome, I'm strong, I'm good,' but in reality, they're just a bunch of feel-good criminals. ”

Finally, Pete ends his mockery with a playful remark, "This movie will touch all the buttons on your body, including the high/high and of course, the untouchable." ”

It is only sixty-three points, which clearly shows the position of "Rolling Stone" magazine. This is the third time that Pitt has criticized Lan Li's work after "Buried Alive" and "Love is Crazy". This veteran film critic doesn't know if he has a personal grudge against Lan Li, but it is certain that he is not interested in Lan Li's works at all. In the midst of praise, cold water was poured unswervingly.

This time, "Rolling Stone" is not alone, "Entertainment Weekly" and "Empire" magazine are also on the same page.

Empire magazine gave it a sixty points, and it was still a bad review, in which Sean Levy wrote, "The expression is tough, the eyes are sharp, and the muscles are strong." This work looks like a work where the force value is full and the IQ value is clear, and every character is pretending, but they don't know what they are pretending. The only exception, Lan Li Hall, changed his stance in the second half and became another fool, and the construction of the character was completely ruined. That's the stupidest, grandest, worst, most boring work you can find on the big screen this summer. ”

Full fire, this is the real full fire, almost the entire movie is sprayed all over again, but interestingly, Sean gave 60 points, which is the only passing score among the five works in the series. From that point of view, it's not that bad.

The real disaster was created by Entertainment Weekly, the most glamorous entertainment magazine of the past few months, which has repeatedly caught the breaking point and attracted countless eyeballs, and this time is no exception. In the praise of "Fast & Furious/Emotional 5", Nanny Lisa Schwartz held high the banner of opposition and launched an all-round criticism of the film.

"If you're wondering why such a catastrophic bad movie lasted two hours, it's because it opened the cliché, read every detail, every prop, every way in it carefully and carefully, and then put it all together. By the way, Ranley Hall looks like a brainless Adam Sandler. ”

Lisa even used the insulting word, "Adam Sandler."

As we all know, Adam is a typical representative of no acting skills, no self-motivation, no ambition, no hard work, and no attitude, he has always been very satisfied with his identity as a comedian, and he is also very satisfied with his routine performance for ten years. Completely content with the status quo. In addition, Adam is also a representative of facial paralysis performance.

This shows Lisa's disdain and anger, and mercilessly nails "Fast and Thrill/Love 5" to the pillar of shame, and of course, Lan Li. The final score is the culmination of Lisa's rejection: 38 points.

Yes, only thirty-eight points. This was the only failing score in the first batch of reviews of "Fast & Thrill/Emotional 5", and it also dropped to 38 points in one go, which deeply showed the deep hatred of "Entertainment Weekly", and even "Empire" Sean was willing to bow down.

If there is good reviews, there will naturally be bad reviews, and if there is opposition, there will naturally be support, this is an inevitable law, and this is true for any film, especially commercial films.

Fortunately, only three of the 43 professional media reviews on "Fast & Thrill 5" gave negative reviews, in the single digits, 10 of them gave mixed reviews, and another 30, a full 30, all gave positive reviews, venting the praise in one go.

"The Hollywood Reporter," eighty-three, "rampage explosions, fiery beauties, tumbling and boiling male hormones, not to mention, handsome, athletic, bold, and charismatic Lan Li Hall—who may be the hottest federal agent on screen this summer, is an irresistible attraction for young viewers." Couldn't ask for more for a popcorn action movie. ”

"Vanity Fair", eighty points, "You can think of the Fast and Furious series as a car, you have made all kinds of upgrades, all kinds of performance improvements, but until then, these upgrades have not been satisfactory, until now." The addition of Lanli-Hall turned this car upside down, and it was almost unbearable to come, radiating a new vitality. Even though it still has a lot of flaws, you're starting to fall in love with the car. ”

Los Angeles Times, seventy-five points, "It's not surprising that it's a superficial movie. Strong muscles, dirty big guys, all kinds of speeding cars, lines with their own explanations, and the emotional transformation of course, everything is so straightforward and easy to understand. It's hard to hate a movie like 'Fast & Thrill 5', which accomplishes its goal and uses every opportunity to ignite the pleasure in the viewer's mind. The only regret: the weight of Lan Li-Hall's role did not live up to expectations. ”

"New York Times," eighty points, "Is this the worst work in the series? With entertaining drag racing scenes, flowing narrative rhythms, and simple and brutal fast/sensory manufacturing, the movie takes popcorn's entertainment attributes to the extreme, and its unbridled imagination is amazing, and in this regard alone, the fifth installment has surpassed any previous work in the series.

Is this the best work in the series? Yes. The role of Lan Li Hall gives more content and space to the script, and the weighty performance makes the commercial film out of the original roughness and messiness, and all the characters become reasonable. Unfortunately, the script did not match Hall's performance, which also hindered the leap from 80 to 90. ”

"Voice of the Village", 75 points, "Who would have thought that the series of works would actually complete the leap from quantitative change to qualitative change." Putting Lanley Hall in opposition to Vin Diesel and Paul Walker to go head-to-head is either a genius idea or a crazy idea, and Justin Lin successfully completes the genius shot. Hall's appearance successfully gave the movie more excitement and sparks, and at the same time gave the movie more stories and meanings, and the simplicity and roughness of B-grade movies transformed into an adrenaline carnival feast. Congratulations. ”

"USA Today," seventy points, "It's a stupid movie, with no more connotation, but it's enough, and it's exactly what the summer season needs." Lan Li-Hall is really brilliant. ”

Praise, praise, praise, praise, stunning, stunning!

In the case of not being favored, "Speed and Excitement/Emotion 5" handed over a high score of 73 in the media comprehensive evaluation, not only created the best in the series, but also officially declared war on "Thor" with an absolutely strong attitude: Now, one side has taken the lead, so how will "Thor" face it?