After organizing the focus of the controversy, it is now time to present evidence and cross-examine the evidence.

First of all, the plaintiff's lawyer directly issued the relevant reports on Chiding from the newspapers or miscellaneous magazines of the media company on the same day, and then the video of the time when the smashing incident occurred.

After the smashing incident was completed, the participants were taken back to the public security bureau one after another, and during the interrogation, the vast majority of them confessed: "After seeing this report that day, and hearing everyone's discussion again, my mind was congested and I couldn't control myself, so I participated in the siege of the full-time storefront." In the process of containment, the contradictions between the two sides continued to intensify, and then under the provocation of well-intentioned people, it naturally contributed to the occurrence of the smashing incident. ”

Now these transcripts and confessions have been found out by Zeng Haotuo, and now they are also presented at this time.

Seeing these confessions, the defendant's lawyer hurriedly defended: "This report only let the masses know the truth of the matter, and now this confession has clearly stated that the smashing incident occurred under the instigation of people with good intentions." Please note that this is talking about people with intentions, not the media, and everyone knows that the media is just reporting the incident. ”

After listening to the defendant's words, the plaintiff's lawyer immediately countered: "I don't agree with the defendant's point of view, first of all, from the first piece of evidence I just presented, the defendant made a large number of false and exaggerated reports on the victim company that day. As the saying goes, I think everything is based on what happened under this kind of reporting, and the main culprit is the media companies that reported it. ”

As soon as the plaintiff's lawyer finished the game, the defendant immediately stood up and said: "I object, the plaintiff is deliberately avoiding the important and trivial, confusing the concept, and leading everyone to ......."

Judge: "The objection is invalid and the plaintiff continues." ”

After hearing what the judge said, the lawyers on the plaintiff's side raised their heads slightly and glanced at the defendant, so that the other side could see what a group fight was, "Sample, brother let you be scared!"

After the defendant's lawyer, Shi Shiran, sat down, the plaintiff's lawyers continued to dig out the evidence.

The next is the direct loss caused by this incident, how many shops were smashed, how much was lost in each shop, how many employees were injured, and how many employees needed to be involved in treatment, nutrition, and lost work...... And so on and so forth.

When talking about each loss, there are all kinds of relevant data, bills, etc., and there are also data that Chiding Company found a third-party professional company to evaluate during this time, and they were all presented one by one at this time.

So far, the submitted materials have been placed on the table, and they have completely blocked a person's view. However, this is just the beginning.

After talking about the direct loss, the lawyer then began to talk about the indirect loss caused by the incident to the injured company.

The first property, compared to the month before the occurrence, the month at the time of the occurrence, and the month after the occurrence. The data of these three months is compared with each other, and the event node happens to be in the media

After reporting the full-time problem, it showed a cliff-jumping decline. Comparison can know that the decline reached 20 percent, according to the previous occurrence, the monthly turnover of 38,496,521.7 yuan, of which the profit was 9,325,700 yuan, until the media reported it, the fluctuation curve was very small, but after the day of the report, it began to enter the decline, the next month's turnover was, 27,634,000 yuan, of which the profit was 5,802,000 yuan, down 38.8 percent from the previous month.

Until now, thanks to the disdainful efforts of the victim companies, the current decline is 24.3 percent, and it is expected that this state of affairs will continue for more than a year.

And after the report, it has dealt a major blow to the brand image, and up to now, the original professional appraisal company gave an estimate of 200 million yuan has become 80 million, and it will continue to fall in the future.

At this point, the plaintiff's lawyer raised his hand to speak, and after the judge's consent, he stood up and said, "Objection to the opposing lawyer's confusion of concepts." ”

When the judge heard this, he thought for a moment, and then said: "The objection is valid, and the defense makes a plea." ”

At this time, the defendant's lawyer took out the data on the views of the people on this matter during this period of time, and the defendant's organization walked on the streets and alleys to interview the people, of which 7.3 percent thought that the media had overreported this matter, 4 percent abstained from voting, and 14 percent of them believed that both sides were not wrong because of their different positions on this matter, and the remaining 74.7 percent believed that the media reported this matter was the right choice, and they had the right to know, and the defendant also had the obligation to inform.

The plaintiff's losses should not be imposed on the defendant's normal actions, but can only be attributed to the plaintiff's own lax supervision, and the losses caused by the plaintiff are really self-inflicted.

Hearing this, the plaintiff's lawyer immediately raised his hand to speak, but was signaled by the judge to stand up and say: "I oppose the confusion of the other party, and Your Excellency the judge and the members of the jury, I have sufficient evidence to show that the data provided by the defendant just now cannot be used as the basis for this incident. ”

The judge said: "The objection is valid, and it is up to the plaintiff to speak." ”

After the judge finished speaking, the plaintiff's lawyer, who spoke, said: "Just now, the defendant cited the data of the investigation report, of which 18% were irrelevant data, and 74.7% of the people believed that the defendant's report was the correct move, and I think this data report is unprofessional and unreasonable, and cannot be used as the basis for the judgment of this trial..."

As soon as the plaintiff's lawyer said this, the defendant's lawyer hurriedly said: "I sent the right ......."

When the judge heard this, he directly said: "The objection is invalid, please continue." ”

Just now, when the other party rushed to object, the plaintiff's lawyer team was not panicked at all, and at this time, after the judge finished speaking, he said unhurriedly: "Your Excellency, I have an audio copy here, please take a look." ”

After hearing the words of the plaintiff's lawyer, at the judge's suggestion, a staff member stepped forward to pick up the disc and insert it

Inside the player next to it, the sound inside came out as the player began to work.

"Hello uncle, do you have time? I am Xiao Liao, a reporter from XX magazine, and I want to give you a brief interview. ”

"Little girl, you say?"

"That's the case, do you know what happened in Rongcheng during this time?"

"Little girl, aren't you referring to the full-time supermarket and the media?"

"Yes, uncle, it seems that you also know about this. ”

"Why don't you know? When I go out to play chess, I hear the sound of discussion everywhere. ”

"Then do you think the antecedent of this incident was caused by buying counterfeit and shoddy products in the supermarket?"

"No, it's good that I didn't buy it. ”

"Uncle, do you think it's wrong for the media to tell the masses about this?"

"Hmm... There is nothing wrong with that, we should be told. ”

...........

"Uncle has delayed your time, thank you for your answer, I wish you good health. ”

One was followed by a second dialogue. Then the third paragraph, the fourth paragraph...... Eighth Dialogue:

"Hello big brother. ”

"Hello beauty. ”

"Big brother, I'm Xiaohu of XX magazine, do you have time? I want to interview you. ”

"Yo! You can still be in the newspaper, and then talk about the interview of beautiful women, even if you don't have time, you have to have time, you say. ”

"Thank you, big brother, that's the case, there's been a hot discussion about full-time recently, I don't know if you've heard of it?"

"Beauty, you're going too far, do you think I look like I've just come down from the mountains?"

"Now that I know, I want to ask, what do you think about the full-time sale of counterfeit and shoddy products?"

"I don't think so! Anyway, I should buy it, and I just want to look at it. ”

"It's not big brother, don't you think the whole thing is caused by the full-time sale of counterfeit and shoddy products?"

"It's to start with the full-time sale of counterfeit and shoddy products, but haven't everyone else compensated everyone?

..............

"Then big brother, do you think it's right for the media to tell everyone the truth about this matter?"

"There's nothing wrong with telling you the truth. ”

After hearing this, reporter Xiaohu hurriedly ended the topic and said to the middle-aged man: "Thank you, big brother, for cooperating with the interview." ”

"That's it? I'm not done yet? It's okay for the media to tell everyone the truth, but it's not okay to be too false...... Hey, hey, hey, don't go, beauty, I'm not done yet.........."

The recording ends with the big brother's shouts.

If anyone in the audience is familiar with this voice, they can tell that this semi-molested female reporter is Li Liang.

It can only be said that there is no point arrangement, how can there be such a clear recording to be taken out. Now that the broadcast was over, the plaintiff's lawyer went on to say, "Judge, the jury and

All of you, did you notice anything after listening to this recording?"

After the lawyer said this, he paused for a few seconds, leaving time for reaction and letting everyone participate in their own rhythm.

After a few seconds, he spoke again: "Throughout the dialogue, I believe that everyone here can feel that the reporter deliberately guides the interviewee to answer the direction during the visit, and guides the interviewee to say the answer they want in words. This situation fully proves that the so-called investigation report data just put forward by the defendant is completely inaccurate and cannot be used as evidence in this incident, but because the defendant dared to come up with such a fictitious evidence in such a sacred place, I think they are contempt for the law. ”

Speaking of this, the plaintiff's lawyer glanced around, and then said: "Let me digress here, based on the defendant's behavior, I have every reason to guess that they are more unscrupulous in normal times?"

Hearing this, the defense lawyer hurriedly raised his hand and shouted: "I oppose ......"