829 Who's Picker Higher?
At the moment when self-media is prevalent, no one dares to say that they can control public opinion.
One Weibo, one >
Therefore, in the face of competitors, the producer and distributor of the film have become an unspoken rule in the industry to discredit their opponents.
So when the two films are not much different on the whole, it depends on who has the more clever means to discredit the opponent.
Red envelope film critics are not just anyone, they are organized.
Is it enough for them to send their own manuscripts? Obviously not, they still need to send them out.
Of course, the number of people they can influence is relatively limited, so to achieve the best results, you need to look at the entry point.
It's actually simpler to write a good review, but it's not so easy to write a bad review.
The bad review you write must have something to say, it must make the audience empathize, make them approve, and then discuss it spontaneously.
All in all, in short, you can't scribble a few handfuls of nonsense, you have to find the audience's G-spot, otherwise, how can you be high?
So, Da Liu is ready to start acting!
His entry point is the comedic style of the entire film of "The Last Bone".
He thinks there is still a lot to do, writing bad reviews these years, to have a positioning, you have to have a target group first, and the style of "The Last Bone" is a lot interesting, but in the same way, there must be a lot of disgust.
Then write a comment, especially to attack the other party with morality, then you first have to stand on the moral high ground.
For example, in the original dog incident, the dog was so bearable, you actually ate dog meat.
This is to target the dog lovers!
And this time, Da Liu is targeting those who are more sensitive and who like to drill.
After returning from the premiere, Da Liu did not write a review for the first time.
Instead, as usual, I took a short break for half an hour to clear my mind.
He's got to hack well, well, to hack out of the level.
The best thing is, of course, to be on the hot search, of course, this is very difficult, not you can get on it if you want to.
But if it is on the hot search, then he can at least ask the red envelope boss for a generous bonus.
The mobile phone >, "@大刘, hurry up, the film reviews of other professional film critics have come out, why is your first draft still out?"
This is the other public account bloggers in the WeChat group waiting for Da Liu's guns and ammunition.
Well, that's right, most of the people in this group are manuscript washing dogs, that is, they tamper with and delete other people's original content, so that this manuscript and the original manuscript look unrecognizable, but in fact, the most valuable part is plagiarism.
By the way, they are one rank lower than Da Liu, but they also collect money to do things.
In fact, everyone complements each other, Da Liu sends the first draft, and then some of them either forward it directly, or wash the draft, and then send it.
Da Liu pursed his lips and replied: "YOU CAN YOU UP, NO CAN NO BB!"
Then turn off the > in seconds
"As a loyal fan of "The Last Bone", I have watched this book no less than three times, and I have to say that Nanmu is indeed a suspense master in Huaguo. ”
This point is very important, not to say that if you write a bad review, you must be black to the end, and you also need to pull allies first, for example, although Da Liu has read the original work of "The Last Bone", but book fans?
But this one hinders Da Liu from claiming to be a book lover.
Then you will be able to shorten the distance with the fans of "The Last Bone", everyone is their own person.
Also, his strategy is that books are books, movies are movies, praise the original books, and then step on the movies.
Holding a book can make it easier for you to be a book lover and be trusted, as for the movie, yes, the movie is an adaptation, but the director is not Nanmu, isn't it?
The original party is not a black adaptation, is it still the original party?
"When I learned that Nanmu personally adapted and directed "The Last Bone", I was looking forward to it from the bottom of my heart, after all, for this work, the person who knows it best must be the author himself, but unfortunately, in the end, Nanmu Jun did not direct, but changed the general and replaced it with Wang Jin. ”
"I actually like Wang Jin quite a lot, it can be said that I grew up watching his movies, his comedies are very funny, there is no doubt about it!"
And then there's definitely going to be a twist.
"I was lucky enough to be one of the first people to see the film when 'The Last Bone' came out, and when I came back, I was thinking about how to write this review. ”
"The case of "The Last Bone" is new, there is nothing wrong with this, and Nanmu's level is still above the level line, but I believe that everyone, like me, was very skeptical at the beginning, comedy and suspense, will it work?"
"I have to say that Wang Jin is indeed very talented and powerful in comedy, a fart makes our abstinence male god forensic doctor fall directly to the mortal dust, which is naturally excellent, after all, this is more down-to-earth and flesh-and-blood. ”
"Everything is relatively satisfying, from the case of the movie, to the cocooning and so on, but, but, but, the important thing is said three times, why, is this case?"
"Thirteen children! That's the lives of thirteen children, and they were brutally killed. Probably because I'm more emotional, sometimes when I see some child abuse videos on the Internet, I hate itchy, the child is so cute, how can you give it up?"
"However, Wang Jin's comedic strategy in "The Last Bone" failed, yes, I am very disgusted, why is it disgusted? Thirteen children left this world and were murdered by cruel means, but in this extremely heavy case, our male god actually used a straw paper as a metaphor, yes, this is indeed a joke, but I can't laugh, I don't understand, why? Why do you want to do this?"
"That's right, according to the character setting, the male protagonist forensic doctor is very calm and highly intelligent, and he is also low in emotional intelligence, but no matter how low his emotional intelligence is, no matter how calm he is, in this kind of tragic case, he should also be touched, right?"
"But what do we see? He didn't touch it, but used it to joke, yes, in the eyes of the murderers, the children were seen by them as commodities, commodities that could bring them benefits, but they were not human beings at all, and our medical examiner, in this case, showed a kind of indifference to the point of outrageousness. ”
"Every piece of papyrus has a value, let alone a disabled or congenitally deficient child?
"I have a creepy and terrifying feeling, can he still be considered a human being? Can papyrus paper be mixed with a child's life?"
"I'm disappointed, why should a director who doesn't know how to respect life at all make such a film......"
.。 m.