There are still a lot of people and things pulling me, my mother, money, family, etc.

It is said that killing is unreasonable, but in fact, the distortion in the brain is the most unreasonable existence. From a few chapters ago, I came to the conclusion that "the distortion in my mind is just prejudice", and then the distortion still controls me without regard for any rational analysis.

Yuan Changwen reacted suddenly, so is this conclusion itself distorted? "I think the distortions in my mind are all biases" Is this itself also a kind of prejudice?

If so, does that mean that some of the distortions in the mind are not biases? Is "there must be truth" biases?

You can never kill cleanly, there is no self-definition, which is a self-definition in itself. The existence of the character is false, and my existence is false, no matter what is filled within.

However, this is not a reason for the twist in the mind to continue to be arrogant. The attachment to money is emanated by fear, and then the content of fear is very reasonable, so I firmly grasp this self-definition and role attributes.

None of this is real, it's just a product of emotional tugging. I don't want to talk about whether you have to be rich in life, and the whole idea is not true. It's obviously "I don't know", but it is pulled by strong emotions to stand on a certain argument.

Killing this attachment is not my attachment to things, but the attachment to the distortion in my mind.

It's not that I don't chase money, it's not that I chase money, and the character's words and actions don't matter at all. The distortion that I have to pursue money, the emotion that I dare not let go at all, is the target of the killing.

I don't know what would happen if I didn't have money, I just knew what would happen if I didn't have money, within my knowledge and knowledge. Again, my cognition and knowledge are a fart!

Yuan Changwen seemed to have forgotten how he had killed before, and he had experienced it but he was a little unclear. It doesn't seem to be killed by himself at all, and those uncomfortable and gloomy days that devoured him, he didn't seem to keep any memory.

It's too tiring to think about and there's no efficiency at all. Everything is just going around in a very small range, no matter how knowledgeable you are, your cognition is upgraded to a very high level, after all, it is only a range.

Moreover, what proportion of this range occupies compared to omniscience? Either omniscience or prejudice, such a simple thing can only seem hazy and hazy when it is pulled by unreasonable emotions, and people are reluctant to approach.

Breaking cognition, the so-called cognition is simply nonsense, as if breaking cognition is a very incredible thing. The so-called common sense is also nonsense, based on memory and speculation about the future.

Flames burn hands, that's common sense, but it's also. What I know, hear, hear, and experience is all proof that "fire burns hands". But that doesn't mean the next time the flames will still burn your hands.

Emotions aside, I really don't know if the next time the flames will still burn my hands.

Also, I didn't say that "the flame doesn't burn the hand", and even if someone really proves that "the flame doesn't burn the hand" through some belief or sorcery, it doesn't mean that the next time the flame won't burn the hand.

Even, I want to find some principles to explain, which in itself is just speculation. The so-called principle is artificially distorted, and on the premise of not knowing whether the past really happened or whether objective things really existed, the artificially distorted speculation is regarded as true.

The so-called proof has nothing to do with proving anything at all. As ridiculous as it sounds, I really don't know if the "proof" ever happened. Flames burn hands, and countless trials have proven this.

The only thing I knew, however, was that I had the memory in my head that "countless experiments have proven that flames burn my hands." It doesn't mean that these principles are real, because I don't know what these memories are about.

It's really extreme, and it feels a bit unreasonable. But isn't the so-called scientific spirit exactly like this, science can't play in its own settings, what is the truth?

I'll always just remember, and I'll say, I'll never know anything.

As for the concepts of the various sects, they are also nonsense. Believe in the invisible heaven, believe in the invisible Elysium, and when you believe in it, you will realize it......

It is true that deep belief can easily lead to fearlessness and can make people much more peaceful. It's like believing in science, which leads to a similar fearlessness about natural changes.

However, it is not true. I'm not talking about what works and what doesn't work, and I'm not talking about what works or anything like that. Is it speculation? Is it wishful thinking?

As for the results of believing, as for whether believing is good or bad after believing, that's not what I'm going to discuss. Honest to the point of cruelty, few people can do it, and I have always followed the pull of emotions, so that I can't do it and just talk about things.

There will always be emotions such as what is the meaning, what is the usefulness, what is the benefit, what will happen to everyone like this, this is a false means.

In this respect, there is no such thing as an atheist. What everyone believes, this belief can be science, it can be a sect, it can be a combination of both. You just need to make yourself feel comfortable, and then these beliefs are good.

Some people need to believe a lot to be calm, and some people just need to believe a little bit to be comfortable. All belief is for peace, to cover up the fear that "the world is not real" and "I am not real".

None of this is true on a case-by-case basis.

If it's just about becoming a better version of yourself, then not believing in the twists in your mind will bring ease and naturalness.

Damn it.

I started to want to talk about it again, and I started to want to preach again. Before I knew it, I was going from slashing to saying some baseless affirmations.

Science pays attention to whether you believe it or not, you can't change the results of the test, and the sect pays attention to it as long as you believe it.

I, on the other hand, don't know anything.

It's too complicated, I shouldn't even think about it. Yuan Changwen found that he seemed to have less and less ability to think, and the knowledge reserves that he was once proud of, and the cognitive upgrade that he was once proud of, were now shattered.

What's more, I don't have any reason to sort out these bullshit stuff at all, unreal is unreal. I don't need to deal with the rest of the story, because the rest hasn't come yet.

Right, I don't need to teach my disciples, let alone convince others. If other people's belief can make you comfortable, then continue to believe it, what's not to do. Besides, where are the others?

I only know myself.