Limitations are not real?

Yuan Changwen suddenly remembered this question, and seemed to be a little unsure, why the limitations are not real? I have discussed it before, but now it seems that I am a little unsure.

I'm not talking about what's real, I'm describing everything that's stuff. There are limitations, so what is it that wraps the limitations, and what is it that contains the limitations?

It's just that the infinite can be described in terms of truth, or in terms of truth or truth.

First of all, I assume that limitations are real, then there must also be existences that accommodate these limitations, and "existence that accommodates limitations" is also real.

However, the "existence of accommodating limitations" is itself a limitation, because it is not the limitation it contains. For example, space contains a lot of limited planets, light, energy, etc., but space is not a planet, nor is it light or energy, so space itself is also a limitation.

Well, there must be an infinity to carry these limitations. No matter how many limitations there are, no matter how many infinite attributes are inherent in the limitations, there must be an infinite to carry these limitations.

Imagine that black and white are distinct, and at the same time extend infinitely into the distance. But black is black, white is white, and although these two can be extended infinitely, they are also certain limitations after all. So, what is it that carries the infinite extension of black and white?

It seems that time and space are infinite, but time is not this table, and space is not this chair, this is the limitation. What bears these limitations is infinite, that is, there is no limit, it is everything.

This infinity can be called truth, truth, or truth. Moreover, there is no such opposition as "non-real", "non-truth", "non-truth", because the infinite is everything, and where does the opposition come from? If there is, then it is the infinite that carries these two opposing elements.

This infinity is everything, and there is no element of its opposite, and there are no other beings that are not this infinity. That is, the table is not infinite, the chair is not infinite, these limitations are non-existent. Because that infinity is everything, infinity is a table and a chair, and there is no existence that is not infinite.

Then, the table and chair is not the existence of the table and chair, but the infinite existence. There is only that infinity, because that infinity is everything, then all limitations are just an illusion.

In other words, that infinity is real, and it is everything. Therefore, there is no existence that is not the infinite, otherwise the infinite is not everything.

Yuan Changwen felt that his brain was a little insufficient, but after thinking about it, he seemed to feel that it was just a very simple thing. There must be something that I didn't think of, or I fell into some kind of misunderstanding of words.

When I think of when I first got a pet, I always think that I am very good to my pet, and I am not happy if my pet is disobedient. I began to make up what I will give you to eat so well, so that you can not be attacked by wind and rain, and become a stray dog to know the good of the family.

Now it seems that these mental distortions are ridiculous. The pet was disobedient and I was angry and evicted him from the house. I thought that pets might become pitiful, because they couldn't find food or shelter from the wind and rain.

However, the next day, the pet was alive and well and had a great time with the other stray dogs. And, not the slightest bit hungry. In other words, there is not much difference between me and me, except that I unilaterally believe that my existence is important to pets. But in fact, it's simply a distortion in the mind.

And how different is my parents from my pets? under the banner of "I'm good for you", constantly reinforcing their own roles, and not believing that I can live well without them. If they admit it, it is tantamount to killing the role of parents.

Having lost their parental role, they had to start looking for another role. And as the greatest meaning of life, how can parents easily abandon the role of parents?

Just like me, I wouldn't easily admit that life with me and without my pet doesn't make much difference. In other words, pets don't care about any warm shelter, food, etc. It is completely self-sufficient and will not be subject to all sorts of so-called rules.

In this way, in fact, my existence is only an obstacle for pets.

Will parents admit this, and will they see their love for their children as a mere hindrance?

Scientific theories are mere speculations, and there is no way to prove that a theory is correct. The only thing that can be said is that so far this theory has not been correct. But in fact, I still don't know if this theory will work next time.

I lock the door every time I leave the house, and my home has never been burglarized, so I claim that locking the door will prevent the house from being burglarized. This claim in itself is absurd, because everyone knows that there are other related elements that work together to determine whether a home is stolen or not.

Every time an apple is ripe, it lands. So I claimed that there was a gravitational force and wrote formulas that could be used to calculate and predict. These predictions are consistent with observed phenomena, but this does not mean that the theory of gravitation is correct. Because I don't know if the gravitational pull will be broken next time.

And when I found that the theory of gravity was a bit rough, and some predictions were wrong, I proposed a space-time continuum, and all gravity is just space-time collapse caused by mass and so on. Again, give a formula for making predictions.

It's all just a guess, and it's far from the truth.

I don't even understand whether the so-called objective things are objective or not. For example, the famous shooter story. An accurate shooter punches a series of equally spaced holes in the target. The two-dimensional beings on the target, then, must think that their universe has a hole every other distance.

Therefore, in order to explain this phenomenon reasonably, various theories are formulated, and the most concise and explainable theory is selected as true. And scientists refuse to acknowledge supernatural forces, such as God and the like. Well, the two-dimensional creatures on the target will never be able to come up with a correct theory about that series of holes.

The story of the shooter always causes panic among scientists, because scientists always speak with data and facts. But for me, strong emotions are the best rebuttal. How can I not work hard to make money in life, how can I be an obstacle to my children's goodness, etc.

Yuan Changwen had a headache, I don't know what the reason is, I always feel a little uncomfortable.

Suddenly I was reminded of the question, what if those limitations didn't need an infinite at all?

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: