I always seem to be falling into a misunderstanding.

You see, I am not the character of Yuan Changwen, and the character's body and mind have nothing to do with me. If I talk about relationships, then it's just that I can only perceive all aspects of the picture elements about the characters.

I, on the other hand, am always caught up in the distinction between right and wrong. For example, I don't think I should hate myself at all, or that the character shouldn't have a certain emotion at all. But in fact, a certain emotion just happens.

It's not that I shouldn't have a certain emotion, it's that I feel like "I don't think it's right to have a certain emotion." For example, I don't think I should be critical, but in fact, the question is not whether I should be critical at all.

Rather, why do I feel like I shouldn't be judged?

"I don't think I should be judged" is just the visual elements that I perceive at the moment, and I can't control the appearance of these visual elements at all. I always thought that I could control myself, that I could think freely.

But in fact, I can't be sure of the pattern of these picture elements at all. I'm only aware of these elements at the moment, so as for what they are, that's not a question at all.

When I was discussing whether I should criticize or should not be criticized, I had already entered this misunderstanding again. Obviously, I'm just aware that "at this moment, I don't think I should judge myself", that's all, what's the problem?

I'm critiquing, and then I don't think I'm supposed to be judicing, but I'm just critiquing. There is no problem with these, and there is no need to be entangled, and even the entanglement itself is only a perceptual element of the picture.

There is no such thing as free will, so anything that happens is inevitable. So, no matter how the character reacts or thinks, these are all perceived visual elements.

It's just that these picture elements create the illusion that you can control your mind and have a certain influence on the world. Unfortunately, these are just illusions.

I can't control my thoughts, I can't have any effect on the world, everything is just a visual element that I perceive at the moment. Well, "I don't think I should be judged" is also just a perceptual element of the picture, and there is nothing wrong with it.

Once you start to discuss how the character should behave and behave, you have already entered into a misunderstanding. Because the character has nothing to do with me, it's just a visual element that I perceive. I often get into questions such as "why do I criticize" and "why am I still like this after killing so many chapters".

Perhaps, it can be explained that the character is still holding on to something. But this explanation is merely speculation. Because how do I know what I perceive about the elements of the picture that I perceive? There is no reason why the elements of the picture that I perceive must unfold according to the logic of the elements themselves.

It's like watching a movie, does the plot unfold according to the characters' ideas, or does the whole movie have to follow some kind of framework? So, how do I know what the framework is? Is it just a distortion in my head?

So, I don't know exactly what I'm going to perceive next, I just know what I'm aware of at the moment.

And is it true that the content of these perceptions is controlled by the character of Yuan Changwen? Obviously not, because there is no free will at all, then there can be no control.

Since it is not the character of Yuan Changwen who is in control, is it too funny to speculate on what will be perceived next according to the mind that he is aware of?

The illusion of continuity of thought made me feel as if I was in control of my own life. It seems that the last moment I was thinking that I was going to eat an apple, and then I was actually eating an apple. So, I declared that I had free will and that I could exert my influence over the whole world.

But in fact, I'm eating apples, but how do I prove that the previous thinking of "wanting to eat apples" really exists?

Again, back to the assumption of the linear passage of time, I have no way of proving it.

has always identified himself with the character of Yuan Changwen, perhaps this is what leads to the fact that this dream can be experienced almost perfectly.

However, these are all just the visual elements that I perceive at the moment, and I have said this sentence countless times, but I still firmly grasp the character. On the other hand, I was only aware of the role grabbing the role.

This thinking necessarily leads to the consequence that it doesn't matter what the character does. It doesn't matter if the character succeeds or fails, whether the character bounty or decadence, whether the character is good or bad. Because I'm just that aware, just aware of all this happening.

So, why do I have to keep killing? I don't have to kill at all?

That's right, you don't have to kill it. But there is a premise, and I have to treat other things as well. I don't kill, and at the same time, I don't take anything else for real. If I just don't kill, but I still regard the world as real and still regard myself as the character of Yuan Changwen, then this is completely evading killing.

Or rather, when I see everything as the actions of the characters, I'm already slashing.

So, the key is to stay in the theater mode, and clearly know that it's all just the words and deeds of the characters. Protector said, everything is just a perceived element of the picture.

There are some picture elements that the characters recognize very much and think this is a good thing. Some of the characters don't approve of it, thinking that it's bad if these things happen and it's the end of the world.

But in fact, these thoughts are only perceived visual elements. There is a picture element that is the thing itself, and there is a picture element that is the idea of the character. So, I don't have any reason to stand on top of the character idea as a visual element and look at any other visual element.

Because I can't control the perceived picture elements, no matter what picture elements appear, it is normal and allowed, and I accept it. Who knows what will happen?

That awareness is everything, that's the point.

There is no need to discuss the question of "whether to be filial or not", but "whether there is such a thing as filial piety". A kind of artificial agreement, what is worth holding on to and not letting go?

Yuan Changwen found that he couldn't remember why he had once firmly grasped filial piety. Now it seems that these are just the attributes of the characters, and I can't figure out why my former self was entangled in the issue of filial piety.

Maybe it's my mother's tears, maybe it's my reluctance to let others think I'm a bastard, maybe it's thinking that my actions will lead to some kind of consequence. These are just distortions in the mind.

There is no such thing as "filial piety", whether the character is filial or not, it is just a perceptual element of the picture. It seems that he will breathe a sigh of relief because he "can be filial", but when he realizes that these are just perceived picture elements, he is already in a state of slashing.

Is it?