It's all, and my existence is the biggest.

Nothing stands in the way of the truth, the truth has always been there.

Even if the killing is completed, the character is still a character, and is the character who wakes up in a dream a dreamer?

Knowing the real character is still a role, even if the character's words and deeds are standing in the real position, there is still a role.

As long as it's in this world, no matter what state the character is in, it's.

The role of Yuan Changwen is irrelevant, why can't he die, why must he cherish life.

It's all emotional confrontation, and before answering the question "Why should I cherish life", we should face the assumption of the question, "Do I have life or not?"

The colorful world seems to have become lifeless, and nothing is real.

The character's filial piety, the character's killing, and the character's self-destruction are all just picture elements, and they are all just realized content.

I don't have to believe in this thinking, I don't need to believe in the characters, let alone what is good or bad, right or wrong.

It's just to make the world look real, it's all just presented this way, and it can only be presented this way, and discussing right and wrong is just an element of the picture to explain the elements of the picture.

And this explanation doesn't necessarily last long.

It's easy to say "there's no such thing as good or bad, right or wrong", but it becomes a tug-of-war if the character doesn't easily continue to grasp the good, the bad, the right and the wrong.

In other words, whether it is good or bad, right or wrong is just a matter of personal preference.

Of course, you can have personal preferences, and not having preferences is also a kind of preferences, and the point is, these are not real.

The specific content of my judgment of things does not need to be discussed, but the state of the whole judgment is not true.

Picture elements show that the character is judging things, so no matter what the content of the judgment is, the whole state is just a picture element.

What else is there to say, throw everything away, return to consciousness, and return to the arms of the Grim Reaper's little cutie.

You don't need to care if the character catches something, the whole character is going to die, watch the character grab and watch the character struggle, and then watch the character die.

What bullshit about other people, life and the like, it's not me, the world is not real, and there is no free will at all.

So, you can't even talk about playing games.

Watching a character named Yuan Changwen walk in this false world, there is not even this world, only the perceptual picture elements.

There is no world there, just the visual element that is perceived at the moment, and there is only this little bit of it.

It is just the illusion of the linear passage of time, and the belief in the correctness of memory, which correlates the existence of an objective universe.

To some extent, it can also be compared to the game world, after all, the so-called game world is also related, only those parts of the screen display.

Perhaps, there really is a world outside of my sight, although this world is false?

I can't prove that the world outside of sight exists, but if I think it exists and believe that there really is a world, then that's brainwashing.

On the other hand, I directly treat it as if it does not exist, is this also brainwashing?

No, to re-examine the problem, we should not use the word "existence", false existence is not existing, maybe it is much better to use the word "present".

The world outside of my sight, still present?

What I am aware of, if I am not aware of it, is the element of the picture that I am not aware of at the moment.

And the pictorial element is one with that awareness, because only the real exists, so where are the unperceived pictorial elements?

In fact, what I want to describe what the character's mind is not aware of is actually presented.

And not that awareness, or consciousness.

Thinking is just one kind of picture element, and there are a lot of picture elements, but the mind is not aware of it, is there anything wrong with this?

However, nothing can go beyond consciousness.

It's just present, not real.

The question can be simplified, is there something behind the wall?

I do not know.

To say "present" is just a compromise, a compromise that still retains the reality of objective things, as if although the world is not real, it is still present a world and presents a character.

Then, you can keep all the scientific theories, even if none of them are true, but still present these laws and show the characters walking in the world.

Answering "The thing behind the wall is not presented" is just trying to show that none of this is real.

The possibility that the mind is only a part of the elements of the picture, and that it is aware of all the elements of the picture, but does not present that "the mind knows all the elements of the picture", cannot be ruled out.

None of this is real, and whether it is presented or not, it is just something that is realized.

No, this interpretation assumes the presentation of objective things, but also the presentation of mine, and assumes that I can only see, hear, and feel a small part.

None of me are here, so there is no such physical sensory limitation of the character.

There is no such thing as unrealized, and the word "present" is itself what is realized.

There is no invisible light, all I see is the image element that I perceive, that is, everything.

Without eyes, there would be no scientific knowledge about eyes, and these are the things that are realized, and that's all.

Behind the wall, there is no presentation.

Since the word "present" itself is the content of awareness, there is naturally no such thing as an element of the picture that is not being realized.

It's all about time, and it's hard to admit that "what's behind the wall isn't presented", just because I can clearly see what's behind the wall when I walk by.

Once the time is removed, this problem naturally does not exist.

Can I organize what I realize?

No.

It's all based on the assumption that time passes linearly, and until I prove that my memory is correct, it's nonsense to explore the laws of what I'm aware of.

It seems that by adding the last label "the world is not real", then you can ignore it, continue to live as usual, still believe in the distortions in your head, and believe in those so-called laws.

It's just a compromise.

Distinguishing picture elements is only for ease of understanding, and only for ease of communication.

In fact, it's a whole, and there is no such thing as a picture element called thinking, to look at other picture elements.

This kind of attempt to explain is just that the characters are struggling to survive, as if even if the world is false, there is still a self in a continuous presentation, and there are still those memories and so on, although they are not real, but they are indeed presented continuously.

It's the means of the role.

Once the time is removed, there is nothing.

It's just the elements of the picture that you perceive at the moment, and everything you perceive at the moment is all that you present.

There is no need for any other beautiful rhetoric, only destruction, and only destruction.

https:

Genius one second to remember the address of this site:. Mobile version reading URL: m.