I am the awareness, and nothing can stop me. That awareness is everything, and what can stand in front of that awareness to block that awareness?

As for the content of the perception, it may be an illusion, or an illusion, or a certain alteration, and then these limited falsehoods are produced.

Well, the idea that a character thinks that there is something blocking them from touching the real is in itself.

The character can never touch the truth, and the thinking cannot touch the truth, because these are all false, and when they touch the truth, it is no longer the character or the thinking.

So, what exactly is the problem?

That mind itself cannot touch the truth, so how can it stop that?

The paradox is that that thinking wants to touch the truth, even if this thinking has killed the distortion in the mind, but it can't touch the truth. That's why it seems clueless?

How can we go further?

Throw the rod away?

There is no such thing as blocking at all, and the characters can never touch the truth, so there is no blocking. And that awareness is everything, and nothing can stand in the way.

I'm still making associations, connecting the conscious minds, as if I'm really controlling the mind and killing so many chapters. But how can I be sure that so many of the previous chapters were indeed killed by myself?

Yes, if that thinking is real and has continuity, it all becomes very easy to explain. There is a point of thinking, thinking all the time, so much so that the results of thinking are written down in so many chapters.

But that's just speculation, and who knows what's going on? If I only existed a minute ago, and then I had a memory in my head for decades or hundreds of years, I would have believed it?

Even though the emotion is very real, I can also pat my chest and reassure that I have really experienced the events of the past. But this is just speculation, a very plausible ...... that explains most things Guess!

No matter how many adjectives are preceded by a guess, even with countless clauses to embellish it, there is no way to change that this is just a guess. Passing off the most reasonable guess as true is a idea in itself. And science brainwashed me so easily.

I can't know if I've really thought about it that much, and I can't be sure if I wrote the previous chapters. It's like a stop-motion animation, it's so smooth when you connect it, as if it's really moving.

But in fact, it's just a fixed state of each frame. If the range of motion between each frame is comparable, then playback is completely smooth. The same is true of movies, which are the combination of each frame.

So, what reason is there to deny that my life is not made up of freeze-frame frames?

The paradox is that the thinking seems to be working according to its own ideas.

At first, it was difficult to accept that this thought was just a fixed number without free will. However, at least time exists, and this certainty is unpredictable, so it doesn't really matter much when you think about it.

When I encounter an event, the character's reaction to it is a fixed number, and his whole mental activity is also a fixed number. It's just that no one can make any predictions because no one is omniscient.

But the hypothesis of time must be proposed, because a hypothesis is a hypothesis, and even if the statement that "time exists at the same time" is very unusual, it is ultimately only an inference based on untested assumptions.

What's so great about it?

And when you remove the time, you become dazed and overwhelmed. It's like a frame of stop-motion animation, there's no before or after, it's just the moment.

I can't move this moment continuously, because this view is based on the memory in my head. At this moment, I remember the last moment, I was thinking about this moment. Then, at this moment, I became aware of the memories in my head.

That's all, to say that the moment is moving continuously, then it is to admit the correctness of the memory in one's head. And where does this correctness come from?

I thought it was real because of its seeming continuity and the fact that it seemed to be moving forward according to its own ideas.

If this thinking is not true, then why did I kill it the way I thought?

This is a problem that has been bothering me. Funnily enough, this way of asking questions has already been explored in the previous chapters. So, this kind of careful planning has reached an unbelievable state, and I am blind to it like a blind man.

I don't know why this thinking is presented like this, and I don't know why the character of Yuan Changwen has started to kill, and I don't know where the so-called killing progress has reached.

It's hard, but I have to admit that I was just aware of a fake character slashing here. The continuity of that thought is deceptive and always induces the character to admit its truthfulness.

Because this is the fundamental premise of the character, and acknowledging the truth of objective things is the best, most reasonable, and most understandable explanation. However, the existence of the word "explanation" itself means that you don't really understand it before you need to explain.

In other words, on the side of the word "explanation", all the content of the explanation is artificially distorted, rather than seeing the state of the thing itself. It is precisely because we do not understand the state of things as they are, or because we want to relate them, and refuse to admit that we know nothing, that we try to explain them desperately.

This thinking makes me feel that I am in control of this thinking. But in fact, I was only aware of this thinking, and I don't know the answers to these questions as to why this thinking thinks about killing, why it is presented continuously, why it has gone from being chaotic to being simple now.

There is no answer at all, because the question itself has holes, and it is all based on the linear passage of time.

Can't I perceive that a character is killing, can't there be a character who is striking in the whole performance, and I am aware that this mind is thinking and killing the distortion in the mind, and I am aware that this mind is thinking and killing itself, is there anything wrong with this awareness?

No questions asked!

These are all false existences, and part of the body, the mind, and the distant scenery are only perceptual picture elements. Then the starry sky, those galaxies, those universes, those witchcraft, those supernatural events, those starships, those tables and benches, those atomic and molecular quarks, etc., are just picture elements.

It's like a frame of stop-motion animation, it's all part of the picture. If you think of traditional stop-motion animation, the elements are drawn on paper so that they are continuous and like real motion.

But in fact, apart from the stop-motion paper, what is real? Those elements are all on the paper, and they are all limitations.

If that piece of paper is infinite, it is the only truth, "I exist."

As for what's on paper, who cares?