Having knowledge doesn't help with killing, but it does make the character more fascinating.

Those knowledge, those things that can be talked about, are always enriching the attributes of the characters. Even if you're talking about slashing, you'll only make yourself more character-aware.

Moreover, there is no knowledge to talk about at all, all knowledge, all philosophical theology, is just speculation. What's the point of the various discussions built on top of these speculations?

In addition to making the character more charming, what is the other point of acknowledging the character all the time?

What else is a living Buddha, write a poem about not deliberately living, not deliberately self-expression, not deliberately indifferent to fame and fortune, not deliberately chasing popularity, not deliberately out of place......

Suppose that this living Buddha has touched the reality and has become a Shakyamuni-like being. Then, the so-called unintentional life is not to grasp the attributes of the character, and not to cling to those self-definitions.

For example, don't grasp the self-definition of "I'm an otaku", obviously want to go out in your heart, but refuse to go out because of this self-definition.

Or, don't grasp the character attribute of "I just love to be clean", obviously want to be lazy and not mop the floor, but because of this character attribute, you force yourself to clean up.

Because the role is false, so acknowledging the role is also recognizing these role attributes, then what it brings is fatigue is hard work, and these things can also be called self-discipline.

didn't let go, didn't surrender, and still made choices according to the distortion in his mind. This is what the Living Buddha called "not deliberately", allowing things to unfold and form on their own.

Speaking of which, it is almost all positive content, and it is also a position that is understood by all those who worship the Living Buddha.

If not, then, should I "deliberately" be a filial child?

Do I "deliberately" maintain my identity as a parent?

Do I want to work "deliberately"?

Do I "deliberately" take on the responsibilities of being a partner?

See, if the living Buddha touches the truth, then there can only be one answer to these contents, that is, there is no need to "deliberately".

When you don't want to be filial, you can not be filial, when you don't want to raise children, you can not raise children, if you don't want to work, then don't work, and if you don't want to take responsibility, then don't take responsibility.

So, let's assume again that the living Buddha didn't touch the reality, but only shattered the template character and became a custom character. In that case, his words have no effect on me.

"Not being afraid of life" is the best way for a person to live in society. However, these things are based entirely on the fact that the world is real and that time passes linearly.

Why should I be discussing what and how to live better?

Life is false, destroying life is what I want to do. Don't say anything about whether it makes sense or not, it's just a complete escape from the topic of falsehood and truth. Because they don't want to face the answer that "life is false", they forcibly distort it with explanations like meaningful.

The most fundamental thing is that he is unwilling to face "without the role of Yuan Changwen", all his efforts and all his hopes for life are actually just shit. A bunch of things that don't exist at all, I don't know what they are.

False is not the same as bad, nor is it a derogatory term, it is merely a description of a state. But I always subconsciously think that falsehood is bad, and falsehood should be discarded, so I will deny that the role of Yuan Changwen is false.

It's like people will think that being unemployed at home is a bad thing, but for the sake of enriching the character's attributes, in order to make yourself appear less stupid. I usually say that maybe being unemployed is waiting for a better opportunity, or maybe it's a process of self-growth.

This is a kind of whitewashing, because the fear of not having a job, the fear of losing one's job, is carried out. You can never directly admit that you don't have a job, and others will not just nod your head and say that you don't have a job, there will always be one party to whitewash. Maybe it's because others want to comfort and want to plump up the character's attributes, or maybe it's because they don't want to be despised by others.

There are always thousands of reasons, but none of them are true. In a word, you don't have to pay attention to any claims at all, and if you want to carefully justify various claims, it is not killing at all. Eloquence may enrich the character's attributes, but it won't help with slashing.

False claims, distorted opinions, limited opinions, what else can be justified? Is there anything else to argue?

I always answer with "who knows", but I don't know at all. On the contrary, when answering "who knows", there is a little joy in my heart, as if I have convinced the other party.

In this state, there is no beginning to kill at all, and it is meaningless to know more theoretically. Anyone can say things like "you are the other", "not two", "that awareness is everything", and there are many things that can be discussed in depth.

But if these are not your own state of life, then it means that you are not done yet, and all the discussions are just to enrich the role. I don't know what other people think, but for me, these are all obstacles that the character wants to live by.

That sense of relaxation had long since disappeared completely, and Yuan Changwen pursed the corners of his mouth slightly, a little low.

Now I can't encourage myself with words like "It's okay, I've had it a few times, and this sense of ease will definitely appear next time". I don't think about words like "It's over, I haven't felt that ease for a long time, I'm afraid I won't be able to move forward" to intimidate myself.

Because whether it is encouragement or intimidation, it is based on fear.

That's it, it can only be like this at the moment, these are the elements of the picture that are perceived at this moment. There's no connection, there's no past, future, or anything like that.

How do I know that the sense of ease that I once felt was there?

Once time is removed, all words become meaningless, let alone communicating with people and the like.

Perhaps, this is the reason why teachers rarely speak. Yuan Changwen thought to himself, he didn't know how much worse he was from the teacher. My teacher used to say it was just a little bit, and I took that as encouragement.

Perhaps, really only a little.

"I exist" is an indestructible reality, and even though I don't know what kind of being I am, there is certainly a "being" who is aware of all this.

This "I exist" is definitely not the character of Yuan Changwen, and he doesn't even know what it is. But it doesn't matter, there's no reason to say you can describe what exactly "I exist".

Killing the false is what I want to do.

As for whether it will be repaired to the truth after the killing, I don't know. ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: