The problem has been found.

I simply can't do the state of "indeterminacy", the character has to determine a state no matter what. For example, I can't be sure about the future, but the role requirements must be set. If the future is not good, then the future must be identified as terrifying or sad.

Anyway, the character has to determine a state, which is why I haven't gotten rid of the character even though I know I can't be sure of anything.

The character doesn't care about these so-called uncertainties, it always makes me ignore these things and then quietly determine them myself. And before I know it, I'm going to be sure of things that I couldn't have been sure about.

The character can't do the "indeterminate" option, and its mechanics dictate that you have to be sure of anything. Even something uncertain can be masked with the emotion of meaninglessness. For example, the expansion rate of the universe, whether this cup is real, and so on.

The entanglement is that the character's self-definition is too complex, and it can determine both the outcome of this direction and the outcome of that direction, and even the two completely opposite conclusions can be determined by the character. Then, anxiety and tangle arise.

But in fact, these are all distortions, and if you don't kill them now, when will it be?

Therefore, there is no point in forcing yourself to be in a state of "uncertainty" now. For now, I should continue to kill characters, and when I don't have a character, I can naturally achieve this state of "uncertainty", instead of forcing myself to convince myself that I am uncertain, or even pretend that I am not sure.

Maybe when someone asks me for advice, I force myself to say, "I don't know, I'm not sure", but in my heart it's actually showing off and proud, "You're all scumbags, you don't know all this is uncertain in the first place, and you're still yelling there", or "It's obvious that it should be, but I can't say, you have to keep it uncertain." ”

It's really funny, it's obviously uncertain, and now I have to work hard to achieve the state of "uncertainty", what have I been living for so many years? What was I pursuing in the past?

The cover-up of the characters is so exaggerated that they have long been anti-guest, and the king of the mountain has long been opposed. Zhen Nyima bullshit, my brain is not mine, what else is mine? Those self-definitions, which one comes from my thinking? All of them come from others, what authority, what celebrity, what historical greats, shit!

As long as it is an opinion, it is false, it is a distortion of the universe to facilitate the understanding and communication of the characters. At the end of the day, it's all about the moves that the characters put out in order to survive. Because only the characters will try to control the universe, and will try to gain recognition through expression.

The character itself is false, unreal, and non-existent. All the self-definitions that make up a role can be one way or another, or even no self-definition at all. It was entirely because of my belief, because of my ignorance, because of my certainty, that the character was able to exist.

When it comes to killing characters, it is actually to stop believing in the self-definition in one's own head, and to stop believing in all the opinions in one's head. It's not to believe in the opposite, because both sides are not real, they are all limited things, how can they be real.

The character's limitations make it a choice of this, or that. The character can never understand the state of being neither this nor that.

Free will, which is something that human beings are proud of, is also the thing that is most valued. It seems that the loss of freedom is equivalent to death, even more terrible than death.

But do I really have free will?

According to the previous method, before answering the question, I first examine the question, and there are two definitions in this question: what does "I" mean? What does "will" mean?

If the "I" in the question refers to the character, then there is no need to bother with what the will is, because the character has so many things that anything can be some attribute of the character.

If the "I" in the question means "I exist", then what does the "will" mean? If "will" refers to the ability to think, and "free will" refers to the ability to think freely, then "I" do not have a "will", let alone free will.

I just felt the characters thinking, like a movie screen, quietly watching the light and shadow change. The screen doesn't have any ability to think, it's just aware, it's just existing. But how does a character know that he's a character, or rather, how does a character know that he's thinking?

No, does the character know what he's thinking? That's the question, rather than skipping the question and asking how to know.

The character doesn't know. "I exist" is aware that the character is thinking, that the character is walking, talking, and so on. The character himself does not know what he is thinking, because the character is the sum of a pile of thoughts, and can thinking perceive thinking itself?

Even though it seems obvious that the character knows that he is thinking and that he is walking, it is all the same, and "I exist" perceives that the character remembers that he is thinking, and that the character knows that he is walking.

I still haven't escaped the beginning of the sentence "I am aware", but I don't know if what I am aware of is true. In other words, I don't really know if the character knows that he is thinking, but I can perceive that the character thinks he knows that he is thinking, right?

Thinking at this moment also belongs to the character, and I am just aware that "the character is thinking about the question of 'does the character know that he is thinking'." ”

But what's the deal with this apparent control? I can think when I want to think, and if I don't want to think, I can immediately think about my mother, the landscape, the architecture, and so on, and I can switch between what I want to think about very freely.

Is it really free? What about those uncontrolled thoughts? Is it rare for me to think about something that I shouldn't think about at all?

Even if you can really switch your thinking freely, and you can really control your thinking freely, then it is based on the information reserves in the character's brain. For example, I think about the breakup is not good, and then I have relevant information in my head, "What's the use of thinking so much", "Don't think about her, it will only make me more uncomfortable" and so on.

On the basis of this information or self-definition, the character chooses not to think about breaking up, so is this seemingly free switching really free? If this is freedom, then it can only be said that this freedom is based on false self-definition and distorted perceptions.

Like the free space in a prison cell, self-deception.

Perceptions are imposed by others, self-definition is the result of so many years of imperial propaganda, so isn't freedom on this basis a prison cell?

Talk about the freedom of a fart.