I didn't expect it to be this problem again.

What happens if someone kills me?

At a deeper level, if everyone is like me, becomes ignorant of morality and lawlessness, then what will happen to me in such a state of chaos and abuse?

How do I feel when I give a helping hand to someone only to get a blank look at them, or simply ignore the mere peace of mind?

I know that this is my deep hope for world peace, at least people get along with each other in harmony and friendliness. In fact, it is the fear of facing some bad things to happen, such as being abused, such as being stolen and robbed.

This kind of knowing, it seems, doesn't help much. When others have a bad attitude, I naturally get angry. In particular, when the other party has nothing to do with me, he will not hide his anger at all, let alone swallow his anger for any goal.

The key point is that I want to be a kind person, I want to be a smiling person, and I still think that kindness and generosity are a necessary element to walk on the path of truth.

This misdirection made me antagonistic, and I was angry, but because the perception in my head told me that I shouldn't be angry, I fought against anger. I identify anger as bad, and the character wants to get rid of anger and even fantasizes about a revenge victory.

Why get rid of anger? Why be a person who smiles even when he is abused?

Is there any essential difference between the two? Anger and smiling are not just attributes of the character. Some character attributes are irritable, some character attributes are good personalities, all of them are false, why should I choose between the two?

All the masters are preaching meditation, they are preaching world peace. But what is the difference between peace and war as a false duality?

Does it have any effect on "I exist"? As for the happiness and discomfort of the characters, it's none of my business.

Therefore, the character feels offended, wants to be angry, wants to be angry, wants to scold back, wants to fight back, and does it, what is not to do? What bullshit "little self", what bullshit is peaceful and quiet, and the heart is like water, all of them are just enriching the character.

I have nothing to do with the character, everything about the character is fake, so I just need to get rid of it. And anger and friendliness are just false elements of duality, so why should I cling to friendliness and reject anger?

Slashing, not to become a better version of yourself, nor to make the character more attractive, but to destroy the entire dualistic world.

Why not be angry?

All the answers are about the character, anger is not good for the body, anger is detrimental to the image, anger will make the atmosphere solemn, anger will keep people away from themselves, anger will make the person appear very unlevel...... Which one isn't describing the character?

It doesn't matter if you're angry or not, it's about knowing that you have nothing to do with your character. The so-called theater watcher mode is back here.

I don't want to get into why the character is offended, what exactly is the self-definition that makes the character angry? because it doesn't matter at all, "think anger is bad, be nice and that's what needs to be killed."

It's all baseless affirmations, like when I help someone and don't get a thank you, which makes me angry. But why do people say thank you? That person's role is not to say thank you, and the whole thing can only happen like this.

It's me who has the problem, not someone else.

It's my mind filled with countless unfounded affirmations that I imagined things to be done before they even happened. When things don't happen like I imagined, negative emotions naturally arise. And I was taught that negative emotions are not good, and I naturally resist negative emotions.

At this time, it is to strengthen all kinds of self-definition. Identify yourself with the role, and then tell the other person's wrongs, expressing the correctness and reasonableness of your behavior. As a result, self-definition in the mind is constantly reinforced, through complaints or conversations.

There is nothing bad about it, things happen this way because things can only happen this way. If I don't have any self-definition, I don't have any ideas about the future, and I don't have any assumptions about other people, then everything that happens becomes irrelevant.

Since I have nothing to do with the character, and I know that, why is the character angry?

I don't know, what's going on with the character, how do I know what's going on? It seems like all of this has to make sense, and I have to provide a reasonable explanation. It can't be, because nothing is known except "I exist". Since it is not known, then all the words turn into speculation.

I know too much.

No wonder killers always use this phrase to end other people's lives, it makes sense to think about it, I do know too much. Isn't it damned to know a lot of things that you can't even know and take them as true?

It felt like the character's fingers were grappling at the fake pillar, and I had to pull my fingers off with all my might. Nothing is real, why is it that you are always so smart to take control of your life?

What is the mechanism of the things that make the characters angry? I don't want to know at all, why are I going to talk about the mechanism of the characters? The whole character is fake, so why am I wasting time here?

Is it to convince others? So to be organized, so to be logical, to convince people to believe in themselves? Am I going to write a book or give a speech?

Shit!

I know that the characters are fake, and that's enough. What's the point of those characters' mechanics? Showing their erudition or being smart? Everything about the characters is false and distorted, so what's the use of the so-called character anger mechanic?

If you know the mechanics and the principles, you can get rid of the characters better?

This Nima is a joke, I know how the machine works, so I can better throw the machine away?

Really, I've been toyed with for so long, and I haven't seen it clearly until now. If you can explore the fear mechanism of the character and the principle of operation, of course, it can be eloquent, and it is very in line with the psychology of the official.

"Uh-huh, that's it. ”

What do I want this admiration for? Why do I need to be believed? Why should I improve my way of expressing myself to make it more acceptable to people who don't understand?

What the hell is this Nima doing?

It's completely a deception of the character, trying to sort out the various self-definitions of the character, just like a book like "Geometric Originals", where various inferences are made one axiom at a time. I don't know if I can do this, but why should I do it?

I'm not done yet and shouldn't waste time here.

Further.