It's raining, and if I had gone out earlier, maybe I wouldn't have gotten wet.

But this idea itself is nonsense, based on the assumption that objective things have a causal relationship and that time passes linearly.

All I know is that I'm in the rain at the moment.

And others, such as going out early and not getting rainy, are just a kind of.

In a state where the elements of the picture are not presented, it is just wishful thinking to think that there will be any difference.

Does the world beyond the field of vision really exist?

Are those objective things really running automatically?

All I know is that I'm here at the moment, and that's what this place looks like.

I think that the impression of an hour ago is compared with the appearance of the present moment, so as to prove that the objective thing still exists and moves when I cannot see.

This is just speculation.

Countless assumptions, aren't they?

Assume the correctness of memory, assume that objective things still exist when I can't see, and so on.

I had no idea what the state of objective things was when I couldn't see them.

To be honest, the real existence of objective things is only a wishful thinking of oneself, and it is also the most reasonable explanation for various phenomena at the moment.

It not only ensures the linear passage of time, but also ensures that it is real, and those memories are preserved.

Of course, there is nothing wrong with this connection, after all, it is still only a visual element that is perceived at the moment.

I don't have any opinion because I don't know anything.

What the world is like, I don't know.

However, none of these limitations are real, and the formation of these limitations is entirely speculation.

Why do I have to try to explain, I can feel the limitations of language every time.

Killing is not worth advocating in the first place, what else is there to explain, and what do you have to look at.

It's like a person who has lost his arms and naturally doesn't have hands, and doesn't need to explain anything at all.

Nothing is worth associating, that's just wishful thinking.

Unreal is unreal, and trying to explain something in an unreal world is not my interest.

Just throw away these falsehoods, and explore what is the meaning of falsehood?

Maybe others like it, but for me, it's just a hindrance to the killing.

Like, everything has to make sense, everything has to be explained clearly, for what?

It's good to die, and as for the rest, leave it to some psychologist or something.

I used to be a solid materialist, believing that there is a self walking in the world, and no matter what I do, the world always runs according to the laws of nature.

For example, whether I go out or not has nothing to do with the rain, I go out early and I won't get wet.

I don't know if objective things still exist and run when they are not visible, but I guess and everyone agrees.

Again, there is nothing wrong with the association, it's all the presentation of the picture elements.

The characters are presented to believe, the characters are presented to doubt, and the slashing is presented.

It's just that I don't believe it anymore, or rather, the picture elements show the disbelief of the character of Yuan Changwen.

How can I prove that the table is still there when I can't see it?

Even, when I see a table, how can I prove that it is real?

It's all picture elements, thinking is picture elements, memory is picture elements, scenes are picture elements, and it's all whole.

As if something was stuck, I almost got it unblocked, but it was just a little bit worse.

That said, everyone is right.

No matter how you look at the world, it's not a mistake.

The state of the character is just the state of the character, and it is still just the presentation of the elements of the picture, and there is nothing wrong with it.

Distortions in the mind can lead to misjudgments, and this judgment itself is only the presentation of the elements of the picture.

Nothing is wrong, and nothing needs to be corrected.

The so-called change is only personal preference, but this personal preference is taken as the truth...... Well, there's nothing wrong with that either.

It's just that I hate characters, I hate the twist in my head, and slashing isn't a big deal, and it's not something to be promoted.

What is the meaning of life, related books may stretch for thousands of years, and then what?

Perhaps, grasping the false is the right way, and working hard is the meaning, but I am disgusted.

I discarded the distortions in my head, like someone else picky eater, what is there to argue about or explain.

As for the real, can slashing really lead to the real?

I'm fake, I'm the character, and the truth has nothing to do with me.

No matter what kind of words and deeds the character of Yuan Changwen has, even if he can perfectly simulate reality, he is still just a character.

There is no real truth in this world, nothing to grasp.

I've always fantasized about the so-called possibility, but it's just, it's just a means for the characters to try to seize themselves.

To think that objective things will still work in an unseen place is just wishful thinking.

This belief lays the foundation for free will, for the control of one's destiny, and then the edifice of nothingness built on assumptions rises from the ground.

And, it's very beautiful.

Die, what else is there to say.

These words have been said many chapters ago, and they can still bring that sense of broken relief at this moment, maybe it was really just talking about it before.

Has the character of Yuan Changwen really always existed?

I can't be sure that my memories really happened, but I have always regarded the character of Yuan Changwen as real and important as what the hell is.

Nothing matters, what is important in this world.

So what is there to remember in this world?

It's inexplicable how the twist in my head can control me.

Even though I know these are just graphic elements, it's like a bad movie full of holes and the characters in it are still fully acted.

It makes me feel very embarrassed, or rather, the picture elements are presented as "I feel embarrassed".

It's all a presentation of picture elements, and there is nothing wrong with it.

Throw away the distortion in your mind, and that's all that's left for this moment.

There is no connection, no possibility, no past, nothing, only the present moment.

And everything at the moment is still unreal, and it still has to be thrown away.

There will be nothing left, all the elements of the picture that are perceived at the moment, and then they are not real.

It feels very simple, the picture elements are not real, and then just throw it away.

It's like a painting, you don't need to discuss what the character grabbed, just throw the painting away.

Going back to the theater mode, is this something that should have been insisted on from the beginning?

It doesn't matter, the so-called should, it's just a must on the road to the goal.

But how do I know?

It's not bad now, although I haven't finished killing yet, but I know that the role of Yuan Changwen is dead.

Because I didn't have anything else to do but kill myself.

Fear is my guide, and when I don't have a guide, I have fun.

That fear that you can't move forward without fear requires destruction in itself.

Throw away the role, the role of Yuan Changwen is my business. (https:)

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: