For me, the teacher's words are just a visual element that I perceive at the moment.

If you look at it from another angle, my words are also only visual elements that I perceive at the moment. My words are just boring "I think" to me.

Why should I care about what the teacher thinks "I think"?

Looking at the previous chapters of slashing, there are countless "I think". Even though I knew that I didn't know anything but that awareness. However, the words are still full of affirmations.

For example, the so-called flow.

Subconsciously believe in the linear passage of time, as if they do not doubt the ability of space to move. Even though I know I can't be sure that I have the ability to move in space, who would doubt that I can get from point A to point B in the square?

Do I really have the ability to move in space?

Seemingly, this question is a bit silly. In other words, do I really have the ability to fly?

I think I have space to move, but I don't think I can fly. How did this judgment come about? What evidence does it have to prove that you can move in space? The so-called movement is nothing more than the visual element that you perceive at the moment.

Only when we regard our past location as real will we think that movement exists, because the position we perceive at this moment is not the same as the position we have just perceived. However, I don't have any evidence that the so-called "perceived location" is real.

Why can't I fly, or why do I think I can't fly? Just because I've never seen anyone fly? Or is it that powerful science has armed my mind?

Can I fly? I don't know, but what is impossible in this false world? Who knows what's going on? Who can be sure that these perceived pictorial elements are all of them? Or will the future continue to move forward according to the pictorial elements perceived at this moment?

I can never be in the future, I can't be in the past, only the present. All of them are just pictorial elements that are perceived at the moment, and there is nothing to argue about at all.

The point is, I don't know if I can fly, but I already have a definition in my head: "I can't fly". How long will this baseless affirmation occupy my mind?

It seems that I have many years of past, and how many years of human civilization has history, but these are still the visual elements that I perceive at the moment, and they are not worth believing at all.

Because all this is fundamentally what has happened from the past to the present, there is a character named Yuan Changwen who has grown up from birth to the first person in the empire. How do I know that these so-called past events have actually happened?

And I firmly grasp the past, what is the so-called historical experience, what is the historical summary, what is the observation and statistics over the years, etc., what the hell is these?

That awareness is the only reality, and these perceived elements of the picture are unreal. I don't know why the picture elements appear, I don't know why the picture elements seem to flow over time, and I don't know why the picture elements seem so real.

I'm tempted to say that these pictorial elements, while fake, still flow linearly over time. Those pasts, albeit false, also existed. It's like the movie is fake, but the plot before the end of the credits is still there.

But these are just a compromise, a compromise of emotions.

Those famous scholars in history have also pondered various theories for this kind of compromise. It's also because of this that their level is below me.

Yuan Changwen wanted to laugh a little, and then he wanted to cry a little. When did you start to know more and the lower your level becomes? I have been pursuing more, whether it is knowledge or cognition, as if people who know more are more skilled people.

It's not about fighting against the elements of the picture, it's about seeing why you started with it.

Why find a theory to explain all this? Right, I've decided that the world is not real, that time doesn't exist, but I always want to make a reasonable illusion about the passage of time, and I always want to admit that the past happened.

The reason for this kind of start is worth discussing, and it is also something to be killed.

The character is so powerful that I have unconsciously put "must go downstream" into my head. It's as ridiculous as having to make money, so what's the point?

Of course, there will definitely be some "must" as a false character. However, this "must" must be my own hand, not some shit must follow fear.

Even the killing can be said to be "must be killed". Therefore, in the end, even the slashing must be killed. However, before that, the other "musts" must be killed, otherwise the "killing" retains the other "musts".

Scientists don't discover something, they invent something. Which theory was not invented, and is there anything that can be discovered?

It seems that those laws are real, but humans have not discovered them. But that's just what it seems. Gravity is like that, it's a thing that scientists invented.

How do I know that gravity exists? Is it because the apple has landed countless times in the past? So, how do I know that the apple will land next time? And when I do the experiment, it looks like the gravitational force is verified, but isn't that a thing of the past?

It's just a visual element that you perceive at the moment.

Scientists are demons, and they are putting all kinds of baseless affirmations in my head. Strictly speaking, scientists are demons who do not know that they are demons and have always thought that they are good people.

It's like a person who is very kind, always cares about taking care of others, and asks for warmth, but his hands are highly poisonous and no one knows about it.

All scientific laws based on time should be discarded. There's no need to talk about gravity at all, is it based on the laws of time? If so, then it's.

I'm not saying that apples will fly into the sky, but I'm not sure if they'll hit the ground.

If there is no gravitational pull, then humans should be floating in the air. It's hard to resist this explanation head-on, because "if...... Then ......" is inherently problematic with this logic, and it just has a just right explanation to take it as true.

The world is only a visual element that I perceive at the moment, and there is no evidence that all this can be explained, so why should I force it to be explained? It's normal to say that it doesn't make sense, because I only know how much? What's more, my so-called knowing is just wishful thinking.

If there is no way to prove the linear passage of time, then everything becomes.