Cherish my significant other?

It's nothing more than don't hurt her, otherwise she will leave me after she is hurt, and then I will know her goodness and regret not cherishing it at the beginning. （）

There's a hidden premise in this, which is that "two people must be together forever", as if if I was just to be with her this month, I would be a liar.

That's right, when you're in love, you really want to be together forever. But in fact, it's just the moment of falling in love and wanting to be together forever. After that, maybe I didn't want to continue to be together. But once you make a promise when you are in love, then you must keep it.

What is this? Is it another way of controlling the future?

If you don't cherish it, it doesn't mean you want to destroy her.

As if I don't do the left, I have to do the right. Always think of a set of rules of behavior, control yourself in your head, and be proud of this set of rules of behavior.

Haven't I had enough laws of behavior? How many laws of behavior have been given to me by the whole empire over the years, and how many laws of behavior have been instilled in my family!

It's all false.

What to cherish? Why should we cherish it?

If it is cherished because it is not easy to come by, then it goes back to the previous topic of a lifetime's hard work.

If you cherish it for the sake of a better life, isn't it setting your life? The point is that the criteria for judging the beauty of life are derived from imperial propaganda. So what seems like a good life is actually the kind of life that our parents have always forced us to choose.

With a stable job, a stable income, marriage and children, it seems that everything is so easy if we don't resist. In fact, to resist, to be free, but to jump into another life that is exactly the same.

The only difference is that it seems to be free, it seems to be inspirational, and it seems that you are in control of your own life.

To be cherished, of course, this is one of several fundamental elements of the character's existence. In fact, the character wants to grab everything, whether he has it or not.

Once you grab more, it means less to let go, and then the fuller the character. There is no need to be elaborate, and the more contrasts the characters are, the better. "I have more than you", OK, I've already won.

In order not to let the character lose something, it is natural to cherish what he has, if everyone does not cherish it, then what about the character? If everyone easily throws away those things that seem to be the core of the character, how can the character survive?

For example, morality, money, life, feelings, etc., when we lose these things, it feels like a different person. That's right, these are a few key factors in the mutual interpretation of the characters, so once these key factors change, it seems that the whole character changes.

In order to prevent this, the character naturally uses words such as cherishing and uses regret after loss to intimidate.

And for the things I don't have, the characters treat them as if they already have them, and in this way, it drives me to fight hard to avoid losing "what I don't already have". Isn't anxiety, fear, and reactions to the future based on this?

Valuing anything comes from the fear of losing. I don't know how others are doing it, and I don't know if others approve of it. The key is me!

My life! I'm such a character! What does it have to do with other people!

Still in others, in others!

Why don't people believe me? Why don't people listen to me? Why do people not listen to me? Why am I right and everyone is denying me?

Oh, my God!

The influence of others on my mind is beyond imagination.

Do I need to explain? Do I need to explain in coherent words? I don't sell anything, it's all about my own life, even if I'm the first person in the Empire.

Don't think about what the hell is like society!

Spend your life with other people's definitions, isn't it enough to be controlled in this life?

"If you get used to it, you don't feel controlled. Just as people who are used to killing people will feel that the law is a kind of control, and when we are used to not killing people, those laws do not seem to continue to control us. ”

How well said!

It's like when I get used to the smell of shit, I don't feel like I'm covered in shit, it's a very uncomfortable thing.

Control is control, and no matter how much you say, it's just a whitewash. Self-definition is self-definition, and no matter how beautiful the falsehood is, it is also false. These controls are necessary for the sake of social stability, for the sake of imperial prosperity.

But for me, the whole life was finalized. Without my consent, without my permission, it seems that everyone has agreed to some kind of agreement.

Where am I? Did I agree? Why do I think I agree by default?

If society can't tolerate me, then I can't tolerate society!

Ha, thinking too much, what am I, will society really expel me?

No, I'm just a person who doesn't know anything, who cares?

As long as I don't preach, I don't affect the lives of others, I don't ask questions desperately like Socrates, and I don't lead people to heaven like Jesus, who knows who I am?

That's right, what right do I have to think that society is going to erase me? Just because of these words? pull it down, God has already set it up, and not too many people will read it at all.

What's stopping me from continuing to slash? everything is laid out, all the roads are under my feet, and I just need to nod and let it happen.

Instead of using my little brain, that poor limited cognition, to stop everything from happening.

Let everyone who should come come.

The fear of the unknown, who is afraid, the character is afraid, and when the character does not exist, naturally there is no fear. All emotions are self-defined. There is nothing mysterious, and there is nothing sacred.

With the framework of self-definition, in fact, we have already filled in all kinds of emotions when we assumed the framework of self-definition. In other words, we have already made the template, and all that remains is the interaction with reality.

It's like a video game, where all the moves are already burned on the disc and waiting for the player to do it.

A change in self-definition will lead to a change in the framework, and correspondingly, the emotions that fill it will also change. So, the same thing, some people care and some people don't.

So, what about when the self-definition is removed?

Perhaps, you won't be able to interact with reality.

It's like a broken video game, who's going to play it?

Everything has a life of its own, I always don't want to believe that, I always think I can control it all.

Fatalism? If it's really fatalism, it's too simple. The point is not that this is the case, the presence of the character is the best refutation of fatalism.

A fake thing, desperately trying to stop the only true "selflessness", and very successful. I believe that I am the character of Yuan Changwen, that I have all kinds of pasts, and that I will use my self-definition to create all kinds of futures.

Hey, it's a bit fatalistic.