Whether the character likes this or that, it's just a presentation of the picture elements.

In terms of visual elements, there are some things that I seem to be able to control, such as holding a water glass.

For example, I can take the distortions in my head as real and try to fight for them in the midst of fear.

And there are other things that you can't control.

For example, my heartbeat, for example, when someone slaps me, I feel pain.

Another example is aesthetics.

No matter how it changes, there will be aesthetics.

Just like the character of Yuan Changwen, no matter how you kill it, there will be a character.

After all, it's still spinning at the character level, and I don't know if you can touch the real thing after the kill is completed.

I don't need to go into the picture at the level of the elements, even if it looks like I've changed something by slashing, but it's still just a representation of the picture elements.

It directly shows my state at the moment, as well as various memories.

And those memories show me where I was, where I was after I started killing.

The causal relationship shown in memory is only the interpretation of the picture elements by the picture elements, and it is not real at all.

The content of aesthetics is not important, and the content of fear is not important, it is all false.

What kind of woman I like, what kind of scene I fear, it's not real.

Is this a laissez-faire aesthetic?

Do you let the aesthetic pull at me?

In that case, why not let my mother influence me?

Is it because aesthetics never pretend to be real?

Or can I easily change my aesthetic and not care, but can't I easily choose not to be filial and form a pull?

It's not that I like sweets, it's a direct presentation of the elements of the picture.

Nothing escapes the picture elements, whether they are slashed or not, they are just picture elements.

I'm changing my role, and I can only change my role.

There is no essential difference from working hard to make money, they are all spinning at the role level.

Nothing in the characters can affect the reality.

That's right, the picture elements present "I catch my mother, I catch filial piety", so what?

It's just a description, and it has nothing to do with whether or not I continue to kill.

That's right, it's not because of my slashing that the picture elements show "I killed my mother, so as to get rid of my mother's pull".

Rather, the whole is the presentation of picture elements.

How did you come back here?

It's not that I'm choosing whether to kill or not, it's the direct presentation of the elements of the picture.

Whether I choose to kill or not, it's still just the presentation of the picture elements.

There is not a single character standing outside the elements of the picture.

All the characters are picture elements, but the role of Yuan Changwen has become my point of vision.

Is there anything wrong with the picture elements presenting "I grabbed my mother and caught filial piety", presented "I started to kill", and presented "I killed my mother after that"?

Or, is there anything wrong with the picture elements presenting "I don't kill, I'll let my mother pull me" or "I know these are all false, but I still hold on to them"?

I always think that the character of Yuan Changwen is independent of the picture elements, and I am not the same thing as the picture elements.

All of them are the presentation of picture elements, just like "all Chinese characters are words", what exactly is this trying to express?

The idea of "since it's all the presentation of the picture elements, then I can't do anything, so I don't do anything" is to separate myself from the picture elements.

It's hard to think of thinking as an element of the picture, it's hard to think that you're just aware of the mind, not that I'm thinking.

I can't control myself, I can't do anything about the role of Yuan Changwen.

The role does what it does because the role can only do it.

No matter how much I thought I could change it, that idea itself was just a visual element.

No, I'm changing the subject.

It's not a slash, it's an obstacle to slashing.

There are so many attributes, so many self-definitions, so many twists in the mind, and almost infinite distortions, but what the hell am I talking about here?

It's false anyway, this is the fate of the character, the fate of this thinking.

That's right, I'm just spinning at the level of the elements of the picture, that is, at the level of the characters.

This is the stage of the stage of the theatrical performance, the element of the picture is to show a character is slashing.

Any questions?

And this world, the relevance of this character, is not real.

Is there anything wrong with the fact that the elements of the picture themselves are not real?

Trying to touch the truth by slashing may be just futile, just wishful thinking.

However, I don't know what's going on, it's just killing, and even seeing the meaninglessness of killing, it's still killing.

I don't need to find a proper reason to justify my killing.

It is to kill, it is to destroy, even if it is all in vain, even if you can't kill it in your life, you won't want to stop killing.

The screen elements show that the characters are slashing, and there is nothing I can do about it.

Unfortunately, this is just a nonsense statement, because the "I" in the above represents the truth.

And the real can't interfere with the false, except that existence is existence, that's all.

I'm a person who wants to touch the truth, so how can I allow my words and actions to not lead to touching the truth?

When the phrase "it's all the presentation of picture elements" is there, it seems that my own killing is just a joke, and I can't accept that.

It's a character attribute, a fake that I'm holding onto.

It's as if I've always thought that killing is a great and reasonable act, but it's still just a fake.

It seems reasonable, it looks logical, and it's still just the picture elements explaining the picture elements.

Nothing affects the reality of the characters, and slashing does not necessarily touch the reality.

When it comes to the truth, it seems that there are contradictions everywhere.

The "presentation of the pictorial elements" seems to bring a kind of calm, while the slash seems to require anger to advance.

Is this true?

Nothing is true, there is no truth in this world.

It's good to let go of your hands and slash, you don't need to think about it, you don't need to discuss.

Characters are made up of these warps, so kill them.

I grasp these self-definitions, and then I cut them off.

If aesthetics stop me, I will kill aesthetics.

When my mother stopped me, I killed my mother.

If something that isn't real is taken by me as real, then I'll kill it.

The aesthetics shaped by the times, what qualifications do you have to envelop me here?

It's like, that's beauty, not that I'm defining it as beauty.

Wrong.

Is there any difference between seeing something and loving it and eating something sweet from eating it?

The point is, none of this is true.

The characters are not supposed to conform to the mainstream aesthetic, nor should they conform to the mainstream aesthetic, but none of these are real.

Don't choose between binary oppositions, but throw away the pictorial elements entirely. (https:)

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: