Young and frivolous?

How did this sentence come about? Did the old people find that they couldn't reason with the young people, so they came up with this sentence to prove themselves right? Is it this kind of contemptuous word that can indicate that young people know too little and are self-righteous?

But why don't the old people be frivolous? Is it really because they know too much, understand too much, know too much, and know too much, that they know that those frivolity is just a funny dream?

Is there really any wealthy family that controls resources, so the little characters have to nod their heads? Will they really hit a wall in the so-called society? Those are just the failures of the elderly themselves, and the distortion of their minds.

Believing in the distortion of the mind, no matter how much it fails, it is not surprising. On the contrary, success through the distortion of the mind is a magical thing.

Of course, the so-called social complexity of the elderly exists, otherwise so many elderly people would not agree to think that they are young and frivolous, and that their social experience is far superior to that of young people. However, there is nothing wrong with the frivolity of young people, who knows how it will develop in the future?

Will the obstacles in the eyes of the elderly definitely happen? Of course, will the so-called success of the young people also happen?

The element of duality is justified on either side, and it is not true on either side. The key is to be "uncertain" and discard those baseless affirmations in your head.

It's not just that it's okay to be "frivolous" or "not frivolous", so why do you have to choose a side to take sides? Fear of future hostility, so you have to discuss and set a course before your life begins. Only by relying on proper navigation can you reach your destination.

However, this fear itself is based on the illusion that you can not be afraid. Those brainwashed scientific theories, as well as the control of daily life, seem to be constantly tempting my brain, "Look, I can actually control these things, and I can have the best choice for these things." ”

That's why, in order to avoid fear, we try to find a standard before we act, and then implement it according to that standard. But I know very well in my heart that these standards and the standards before these actions are all nonsense. That's why hesitation and hesitation.

On the other hand, the so-called Law of Attraction, the so-called prayer with gratitude, is not trying to bring one's mindset to the so-called "mindset after something has been done". With this kind of cheating, why don't you just "not be afraid of life"? Why don't you just throw away the distortion in your head?

So, for a teenager, is it better to be old or frivolous? The question will naturally arise, and of course, the magistrate who can see it here may smile lightly. Because the answer has been said countless times, I don't know, I can't be sure.

Look at those baseless affirmations, what "you must be crazy while you are young", what "your so-called stability is just a waste of life". Doesn't anyone wonder where these words come from and why they are accepted by the brain?

Yuan Changwen knew that he was the mentally retarded, and he had no doubt about accepting it all. Those so-called critical ideas are just fools who want to show that they are not fully accepted.

Deceive oneself as well as others.

Is there anything wrong with a person who likes stability?

Perhaps, one side will show what I have walked you have not seen, what kinds of beauty and humanity, what completely unbelievable experiences, what strange pain, uncomfortable laughter, and so on. And think that if you haven't seen these things in life, then it's a complete waste of life.

So can people who like stability refute it like this, for example, you haven't seen it in the system you have seen, you don't know the secrets that are not passed on, and those things you think are actually on the surface. Also, if a person doesn't know these things, he or she is working in vain.

Yuan Changwen felt funny when he thought about it, what is the use of these arguments, they are all going around in circles in falsehood. It seems that the content of these arguments is important, about life, and in fact it is just a piece of shit.

Who's going to argue about a position?

Have you ever experienced the feeling of pooping on stilts? Do you know the feeling of pooping on one foot? Do you understand the taste of pooping on the table?

These are also extraordinary life experiences, and they are also landscapes seen by a few, so why is no one preaching them and no one arguing?

So, what exactly are you doing?

Yuan Changwen saw his own absurdity, if these were not set, then it could only mean that there was something wrong with his brain. You have to think that a problem can be explained, you have to think that it is all free.

But then again, the world is the way it is because it can only be that way. It's just that the once familiar world seems to have become strange. The idea of what used to be its own flag, now it smells like shit.

The words "I don't know" don't have any guiding meaning for life, and if they do, they don't mean anything. Not only others, but even myself are false, and this thinking is also false, and I am not manipulating it at all.

So-called, what goal to achieve, what wish to achieve in this life, these are not my things.

All of them are just pictorial elements that are perceived at the moment, and they seem to be full of possibilities, but in fact the so-called freedom is just an illusion.

It's like a painting of a villain with a spear stabbed into the chest of a villager. It seems that if that villager is not in that position, then it will not be stabbed in the chest. But could this happen?

That's what I am now, and I've always thought that it's all about possibilities. Moreover, the key point is not that there are any possibilities, because no one knows the future, so it is indeed full of possibilities. But can I control it?

This is the key point, and "I can control" is manifested in two aspects. One is to think that if you had been like that in the past, you wouldn't have led to the way you are now. The second is to think that you can interfere in the future, and trust the distortion in your head to weigh it.

Admittedly, I don't know what the future holds, so it doesn't matter what I choose. And after it happens, it has become a picture element, what else is there to discuss?

And for the discussion of the future, it is just a picture element that is perceived at the moment, so what is there to believe?

In fact, "I don't know" still has a bit of a role to play, and it can completely get rid of the distortion in the mind. When you really believe that "I don't know", or when you see with your own eyes that those who believe that "I know" are, you will have less sense of manipulation about the future.

Nature will surrender and will accept fate. Perhaps, there will be no worldly achievements in this life, but the goal of my pursuit of worldly achievements is also to make myself comfortable. It's like every time you have a cool fantasy, the content is not important, as long as you can make yourself comfortable.

If it leads directly to comfort, why do you use worldly achievements?

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: