I'm not saying that a twisted story in my head is impossible, or that it's definitely going to happen.

If you don't know if it's going to happen, why assume it's going to happen and keep seeking the so-called control to stop something horrible from happening?

"What if it happens?"

This may seem like a realistic question, but it's actually a product of fear. So, how do I know that the control that prevents things from happening, is really the control?

It's entirely possible that what you think you're stopping is actually pushing for something horrific to happen. Since I'm not omniscient, how can I be sure of how things that are outside of my knowledge work?

If you don't know, how can you make sure that the answers you come up with in your mind are really preventing the horrific thing from happening?

In case it happens, it's just a tug of fear that makes me believe the horror scenes that I twist and make up in my head. And, believe all the bad things that are twisted and concocted in your mind about the horror scene that follows it.

I don't know why I should believe it, why believe it when it's so uncertain, and besides, the things that the twists in my head make up are just prejudices, things that are just created in humble and narrow confines.

Fear makes me believe, and fear makes "uncertain" become "certain".

Yuan Changwen found that he once again didn't understand why his former self believed in the distortion in his mind.

I used to be in a state where I knew that the distortion in my head was just, but I was still afraid of the distorted and made up stories.

Now, I don't understand why I believe it, and I don't see anything wrong.

In the same way, he seems to have forgotten how he killed in the first place.

Obviously, "in case it happens" is a very reasonable statement, and it is also a very logical concern. However, I just don't understand why this problem is there, and I don't understand why I am worried.

Even, even if it happens, there doesn't seem to be a problem.

The pull of emotion was as tightly bound as an anchor, and this thing had been slain by me. I used to think that too many things couldn't happen, but now it seems like they can happen, and the inner confrontation and tension are gone.

Of course, I don't know if it will reappear, but I don't understand how I used to live my life. What was once very clear, those truths and those knowledge, are now gone.

With "I don't know" as pride, will anyone be willing?

It's not a great state, it's still fake, and it's no different from any of the characters' states.

I can't say that if the character is having an easy life, it is good, and if the character is anxious, this judgment itself is nonsense. In other words, this kind of judgment is just a personal preference, and it is not a truth.

Even if the whole world agrees with something, it's just that there are many personal preferences of the same kind, and it's still not a great or sacrosanct thing.

Just like the whole world thinks bitter gourd is not delicious, but I think bitter gourd is delicious, am I wrong?

What is not a personal preference? What is fundamentally different from "bitter gourd is not delicious"?

Whether it is kindness, benevolence, morality, filial piety, tradition, etc., it is a personal preference, and it is all a category of "I think". There is no inscription in the sky that says "human beings must be kind", and there are no words such as "benevolence and filial piety" engraved on the body.

It's all "I think" that these positive things are good, and the vast majority of people agree with that, that's all. The same is true of fear, as if there are many people who agree, so the content of fear is real and irrefutable.

Yuan Changwen began to think back to how he had slashed Fear, as if he hadn't killed Fear because his opponent was false.

The content of the fear is made up, why the content of the fear can't happen, the pull of the emotion, the tension of thinking that "things can't happen". It seems that this is the case, Yuan Changwen himself doesn't remember how to kill it.

Are they all representations of picture elements? Either omniscient or prejudiced? Unable to do anything about it?

Yuan Changwen found that he really didn't remember the previous killing, as if the state at the moment was so natural, and the previous state was inexplicable. Moreover, it is impossible to recall the inexplicable in its entirety.

It's like I can't figure out why anyone believes in heaven, let alone how I killed someone who believed in heaven.

When I first started killing, I was really active and wanted to find someone to debate. I also want to return to the empire immediately, and then start teaching my disciples again. During that time, there were many words and many rhetoric, and I kept fantasizing about winning the debate in my mind.

Now, I don't know what to say or how to do it. It's as if the person he killed before was not himself at all, and those thoughts never happened.

I don't know if my current situation is a good thing or a bad thing, but it doesn't matter at all, and I don't need to know. Whatever the state of affairs at the moment means, I can't be sure. Because what it means is someone else's words, even if the teacher says it means progress or regression, I still can't be sure.

The truth is there, the awareness is there, and it has nothing to do with the presentation of the elements of the picture. My knowledge, my thinking, are all the presentation of picture elements. Whether the character is killed or not does not affect the real thing.

It's just that whether the picture elements present "the character knows the truth", just as the movie content will perform the drama of "the character knows that he is only a movie character", and what does it affect?

I'd love to claim I'm almost done, but I can't. If it is not done, it is not done, and the word "soon" is just speculation, just wishful thinking.

The price of underestimating falsehood is to stop moving forward, but think that you are making great strides. Even the killing itself can become an emotional pull, what else can't be a means of falsehood?

Yuan Changwen remembered that when he didn't dare to discard the killing before, he was afraid that he would not be able to complete the killing, and he was afraid that the character was just wasting time after all. There are countless excuses to prove the necessity of killing, but after all, there is no way to deny that it is just an emotional pull.

The character has nothing to do with the truth, and any attempt to spend effort on the character is just a false means. Because the core of it is to ensure the existence of the character, then I can spend effort on the attributes of the character to become a better person and so on.

Of course, I'm not saying that killing leads to truth, after all, I'm still in the midst of falsehood. Even if I finish the killing, I can't be sure that the killing will lead to the truth.

As the teacher said, I believe this, and in the end I will still kill this belief. (https:)

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: