It's unbelievable that the movement of the crowd and the running of the animals seem so natural and natural.

But how do these movements seem so natural and unpretentious in the absence of time?

Hell, or rather, it's just perfect.

I am not the character of Yuan Changwen, but I always think that I am the character of Yuan Changwen, and I always think that I have hands or minds, etc.

Look at your own hands, who would think that these hands do not belong to them, how easily they can be controlled, how flexible, how can they not be their own?

But the thought itself is an illusion, and the hands are just the elements of the picture that they perceive at the moment, and they can't prove anything at all.

It seems that it has become my instinct to relate to the elements of the picture that I perceive. In other words, this instinct is also a visual element of awareness.

Yuan Changwen thought about his behavior and what he had done. It makes a mess of everything, and when that sense of relief comes in, it's incredibly comfortable.

It seems that there is always something to find in life. Even if it's idleness, then enjoying this idleness can be counted as a goal.

Can people really grow?

This so-called growth must be based on the linear passage of time. Without time, there is no such thing as growth. Again, then, these things are only the pictorial elements that are perceived at the moment.

One picture element shows the state of the present or the near future, and the other picture element shows the state of the past, so the two compare and find their own changes. That's it, so I declare myself growing?

There is no growth, no fixed program, no fixed number, all of these statements are based on the assumption that time passes linearly. Once time is removed, all these nice theories will disappear.

It's all the pictorial elements that are perceived at the moment, so what else is there to talk about?

This feeling of discomfort and disbelief is due to the fact that the hallucination of the linear passage of time is so real that no one wants to discuss it.

I feel that it is my own efforts that cause my own change. You see, before the killing began, I was such a person. After slashing through so many chapters, I became like this. In this case, it is difficult to deny the existence of time. However, the above inference has already been drawn, and this alone proves that the linear passage of time is an unfounded affirmative sentence.

You have to learn to make a difference. In other words, there must be action, whether it is the action of the mind or the action of the body, and only then can it make a difference. If you don't think about anything, if you don't do anything, will anything change?

That's my question at the moment.

Cause and effect seem to be ingrained in the marrow, and if no one touches the apple, then the apple will not move. I boil it all down to that awareness, which is to say, that I don't really know what it's about.

However, the "action-change" model simply cannot be refuted. If action is necessary to lead to change, it doesn't matter if the world is real or not. Because if I want to change, I have to act, and the motivation for action comes from the distortion in my head.

In this case, so many chapters of slashing are just to make the characters understand some truth. Other than that, there is no other use. Instead of killing the characters, they fleshed out the characters. In other words, it lightens the self-definition of the role and makes the character more perfect from another perspective.

The reason why I am at this moment is because of my previous efforts.

Yuan Changwen found that he did not seem to be able to refute this statement. Even if you deny your own efforts, even if you describe them as visual elements that you perceive at the moment, you will not overturn the "action-change" model.

If I sit still, I won't move. In other words, perceived elements do not change their background. In this way, even the perceived elements of the picture seem to follow certain rules.

Wrong.

Where does the affirmative phrase "If I sit still, I won't move", come from?

Obviously, this is the conclusion of my observation, or rather, it is one of the elements of the picture that I perceive at this moment. Elements of the picture show the relevant memories, and it is found that no one can "sit still and move".

And, can I prove that "if I sit still, I won't move"?

There is no way to prove that even if I sit for the rest of my life, I will not move until I die. In this case, there is no way to prove that "if I sit still, I won't move." ”

There is only one thing that is proven, and that is, "I sat all my life and sat until I died without moving", that's all. In other words, there is one more element of the picture that is perceived.

Isn't it too ridiculous to claim that "if I sit still, I won't move" just because I have sat still for the rest of my life, I have sat until I die?

The problem is actually the same as the "sun rising" situation, even if the sun will rise as usual for hundreds of millions of years, I can't prove that "the sun will still rise tomorrow".

The point is that I didn't say, "I'm going to move if I sit still."

I'm always in black and white, and it seems that the result of "I sit still" is either "moving" or "not moving". However, both of these are baseless affirmative sentences.

I don't know, that's the answer.

All of this seems to be the result of my hard work, and it seems that I have been killing to lead to my current state. But it's just "looking", and no one can be sure if it's true or not, or if my previous efforts have been real.

The only thing that is certain is that these are the elements of the picture that are perceived at the moment.

Yuan Changwen suddenly felt funny, and when he replied "I don't know", he found that this was the correct answer. In other words, this is the result of not being distorted by the brain.

If the teachers in the school know that after so many years, the biggest gain is to throw away the knowledge that has been learned hard, and the most comfortable state is "I don't know". Maybe the school teacher will have his nose crooked.

Therefore, it is neither "moral" nor "immoral". It is neither "sit still, you can't move", nor "sit still, you can also move".

It's, because I don't know what's going on. So, I don't need to worry about what I should continue to work hard to kill.

After there is no causal relationship between the events before and after, I don't need to kill the end of the kill and try to kill it, and I don't believe the negative content. It seems that you can finish the kill without killing yourself.

I don't know, I don't know anything.

These are all distortions in my mind, and the distortions in my mind are not qualified to be my rules of action. Whatever you believe, it's. ()

Please remember that the first domain name of this book is:. Mobile version reading URL: